Hello! 2 years ago I went to normandy to discover Operation overlord. When I stod on Omaha Beach at the Dog Green sector I read in a book called Bloody Omaha about that the Dog Green sector was the worst and bloodiest of all sectors. Was The Dog Green sector the bloodiest? or was any of ther other even worse. Im also curious about how the machinegun nests were constructed? I have seen many different constructions of the nests. Everything from the big bunkers on Saving Private Ryan to a flat plateau with sand sacks to cover. I scaned in a picture from the book. Anyone have a clue how the mg nests on the cliff that I have pointed out might look like? I have also trying to find info about how Heinrich Severlohs mg nest looked like. The book is really good and shows most bunkers but this is mainly for cannons/PAK etc. Anyone got some facts/pictures or anything that could help me with these two questions that I've been struggling with for over 2 years now. Best regards Johan
Hard to say for sure, but the drawing seems to be showing positions at the ends of a trench system. MG crews would have sheltered in concrete dugouts during heavy bombardments and manned the sandbagged MG emplacements when ordered out. This site: Omaha Beach-Vierville has this photo (but slightly larger): View attachment 18140
I'm not sure if this helps, but this article, while it has no pictures, gives a mental image of Severloh's position. Heinrich Severloh
According to 'Fortress Third Reich' by Kaufmann & Kauffmann, the Easy Red sector of Omaha Beach was overlooked by a number of Tobruks ( pp 310-312 ).
thanks alot for your replies guys Really nice info here, I can believe that Hein Severloh and the ones at WN71 looks quite similare to your pic Earthican
Found this picture, circled a interesting thing I saw. Looks like some small bunker, any idea what it is and what it's used for?
It's difficult to tell from the photo, but it is a possibility that what can be seen is the roof of a Type 134 ammunition bunker ( Munitionsunterstand 1) which was very common on the Atlantic Wall.
Dog Green and Charlie Green are believed to have suffered the largest number of casualties, although calling Omaha Beach "Bloody" is certainly an exaggeration. It was bloodier than any of the other D-Day beaches, but that's not saying much : assaults on those other beaches were practically unopposed. For the 24 hours of D-Day, casualties for the Omaha assault divisions (and supporting personnel) was around 2000. Probably less than 1400 were suffered on the beaches, and probably fewer than 400 were killed there. The similar two division amphibious invasion of Roi-Namur and Kwajalein in the Pacific suffered almost identical casualty rates as Omaha Beach, yet was praised for the "light casualties" suffered. "Bloody Omaha" wasn't all that bloody, despite Spielberg's propaganda in Saving Pvt Ryan that it represented huge sacrifices.
I heard that more casualties were sustained in the immediate breakout from the beachhead then the actual landings.
It is hard to work out exactly what the "most bloody" sector was. Is this the place were most casualties were suffered? Or where the highest proportion of casualties were suffered? The first wave to land on Dog Green, Company A of 116th Infantry suffered disproportionately high casualties. Several factors conspired to make to this company losing C 60-80% casualties. Co A was taken to the correct beach. Their flanking companies were landed further East, carried by the wind and tide. No armour landed at H Hour as the weather was too bad for the DD tanks for this sector to be launched. Instead they landed some time later.. As a consequence the five landing craft carrying this company suffered the concentrated fire of at least two machine gunners per LCA. Stand on the little pier at Vierville, about level with the LCAs of Co A with a map of the defences. Because of the weather, landing craft drifted East and a disproportionate number of troops landed on Easy Red, Fox Green and Fox Red. I suspect that the true beast of Omaha was not Hein Serverloh, but his boss Lt Ferking, the artillery observer who brought down fire on US troops pinned down behind the gravel sea wall. Serveloh's trench is the slit in the open at the rear of Ferking's OP on WN62. He was the driver and brew bitch and outside the concrete OP because there was no room. The position has a good view diagonally across Fox Green. It is behind the earth bank on the side of the OP and could not be engaged from seaward. This may account for his survival..
I appreciate your desire to promote your photo site, but I must ask you not to scatter posts like the above all over the forum.
The majority of the killing on the Dog Green stretch of beach was carried out probably by no more than 2 or 3 well sited enfilading bunkers located on top of the bluffs. These bunkers were part of the WN71 and WN72 defensive positions. The first waves would have suffered at the hands of a few more mgs, trench and tobruk sited small arms as well as at least one MG position connected to the 50mm bunker (the forward most bunker in the D-1 draw), but after the tank and naval fire managed to suppress these the 29th division and Rangers were still left with at least: one MG bunker around the WN73 complex which was later taken out by Capt Goranson and his 2nd Rangers; one double embrasure MG nest looking east from a fold in the D-1 draw's western bluff (this position I believe was mostly destroyed by naval artillery but is still partly there) and a western enflidaing bunker on top of the bluffs at WN71. Not a great deal is known about how the WN71 bunker system looked like as that position took extensive fire from the USS Texas, but the bunkers looked nothing like out of Saving Private Ryan, those types of bunkers would've taken 20mm fire instantly and been suppressed.