Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

AC Thunderbolt

Discussion in 'Armor and Armored Fighting Vehicles' started by ykickamoocow, Jan 12, 2017.

  1. ykickamoocow

    ykickamoocow New Member

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2017
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    I have been watching a series on Tank battles recently on youtube and quite randomly when doing some reading on wikipedia I found this

    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Thunderbolt_tank

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]

    The AC Thunderbolt developed in 1942 by Australian engineers (I am Australian and I had previously never heard of this tank). It was apparently capable of firing a 17 pounder or a 25 pounder and due to its sloping armor at the front of the tank was pretty good when it came to deflecting shells fired from other tanks or anti-tank weapons.

    On paper at least it looks like it would be a match to the Sherman tank, maybe even the Sherman Firefly given that it has the same gun as the firefly so I thought I would ask people here who have a lot more knowledge than I do about how you all think this tank would have gone if it was put into production in late 1942 and saw action, either in the Pacific or in the European theatres of operation? How do you think it would have gone on and after D-Day compared to how the Sherman or Cromwell went, would it be more or less effective?

    Also any more information on the AC Thunderbolt would definitely be appreciated as well as I find this tank quite interesting.

    Thanks,
     
  2. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Some musings on these Aussie Cruiser projects here, with passing reference to the twin-gunned & 17pdr efforts:
    WW2Talk - Cruiser Mk III (AC3) Tank
    Don't think I've ever heard it called the Thunderbolt.

    Sentinel was by all accounts a fine vehicle, and that cast hull was an impressive bit of engineering. All overtaken by easier supply from elsewhere and changing needs.
     
    ykickamoocow likes this.
  3. DaveOB

    DaveOB Member

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2016
    Messages:
    90
    Likes Received:
    4
    Wikipedia says it has HVSS suspension. Was the suspension any good? Any insights as to how the suspension compared to the Shermans vvss? I'm assuming it was at least marginally superior or why use it over, one might assume, the more available vvss?
     
  4. yan taylor

    yan taylor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    36
    ykickamoocow likes this.
  5. yan taylor

    yan taylor Member

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    559
    Likes Received:
    36
    Thank you young man for the "Salute", but that is what we are here for and I can remember all the help and advice I received when I first started posting on these types of boards around twelve years ago and how people would try their best to find info to solve my many questions.
     

Share This Page