Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

KV-220?

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Roel, Feb 8, 2006.

  1. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Is this Russian "super heavy tank" an invention of modelling brand PST or did it actually exist? Does anyone have any information about it?

    It looks more or less like an elongated KV-1 with a huge turret and gun. I do not even know what gun it has.

    Anyone?
     
  2. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    I think it was proposed design, I'll have a look at my files this weekend - but you could try battlefield.ru (IIRC), they go into "paper projects" etc.
     
  3. aglooka

    aglooka Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    6
    via TanksinWW2
  4. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks guys!

    Oli: I hope you can turn up something from your file, I find these Russian experimental heavies very interesting. Mostly because they don't seem as utterly unfeasible as their older work.
     
  5. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    It sems to be some confusion about the nomenclature there was no
    KV 220 , there was however experimental designs ,called objects2.. ,
    the tank got it's official naming once it passed its acceptance test by the
    army inspectorate , so properly it was object 220
    kozin the KV designer was in deep trouble , no front line general wanted
    the KV and the new design for the universal tank , a new KV , had been
    rejected by the army as a waste of time and resourses , there was talk of
    discontinuing the production line to the advantage of the new T34/85
    the body of the KV would be used for self propelled guns
    Stalin was very upset ,there was death looming for failed designers
    guess what , a young engineer was listened too and after an extended
    period of rather confused redesign and upgrade , the JS2 was born.
    It's funny what physical treats of extreme prejudice can achieve .
    If you think it iwas a bit drastic , keep in mind than thousands russians
    boys were wasted without support tanks , while the designers were home
    as confortable and as safe as you could be in wartime russia .

    Jeaguer
     
  6. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
  7. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Thanks both. Can Battlefield.ru be trusted on facts like these? Sometimes I get the idea that they are basically the Russian equivalent of Achtungpanzer.

    Those sketches, accurate or not, are quite interesting though. If anyone was thinking the E-100 and Maus were typically German...
     
  8. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    very interesting ,on the intelligence side ,during 1940 and the full bloom
    of the german/soviet non agression pact amongst other thing the german
    had to show the russian side all their tank production ,
    when told the PZKW4 was the heaviest tank in the army , the russians hit
    the roof and accused the germans of bare face lying , they could not
    believe that was THE heavy tank !
    On the other side the discovery of "some 100t tanks " during barbarossa
    freaked out the germans and pushed them to insist on a heavy tank
    production .
     
  9. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    jeaguer do you have a source that has information about those 100t tanks? because I am interested in learning about them.
     
  10. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    nothing very specific , several unrelated quote from witnesses present
    during conversations with hitler , a reference on the army group south in
    ukraine in 41 , I though at the time it must have been some of those
    double turreted land battleship 1930 style .
     
  11. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
  12. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    No, those did not weigh anything near 100 tons. Actually they weighed about half that.

    Beasts like the SMK come closer but they still do not qualify, so I assume the "100 ton tanks" statement is an exaggeration or a report of some design encountered in a factory somewhere.
     
  13. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I know those werent 100t they were medium tanks, I wanted to know wether or not that\\ose were the 1s hese refering to
     
  14. jeaguer

    jeaguer New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 5, 2006
    Messages:
    929
    Likes Received:
    4
    Location:
    Sydney Australia
    via TanksinWW2
    there weren't any type mentionned , in 41 the german did seems a little
    bit hysterical about the russian tanks.
     
  15. aglooka

    aglooka Member

    Joined:
    Sep 8, 2005
    Messages:
    163
    Likes Received:
    6
    via TanksinWW2

    well, i can understand that if you meet a T35 or KV1-2 in a early model pzkw3 or a t38

    Aglooka
     
  16. trappermike

    trappermike New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 3, 2006
    Messages:
    17
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    Kv-200?

    The Russians built a new model of the Kv-1. It mounted about a 150mm gun,but had an enourmous turret,a giant box which was really high.I believe this tank was called a KV-2.But this mounstrous turret was so heavy,that if the tank was on sloped ground the turret wouldn't rotate,the gun was too heavy to swing.Also of course the giant turret was a fine target. :eek:
     
  17. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Luckily for the crews, the KV-2 had such thick armour that it was impervious to most German AT guns in 1941.

    In a celebrated incident, a single KV-2 held up the 6th Panzer Division for several days...

    See this topic for more info:
    http://www.fun-online.sk/forum/viewtopic.php?t=1175
     
  18. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Just found this in the Osprey book on KV-1 and II
    Osprey New Vanguard No. 17 KV-1 & 2 Heavy Tanks 1939-1945, Steven J Zaloga, Jim Kinnear & Peter Sarson
    Basically a Soviet General, Kulik, got hold of erroneous intelligence saying that the Germans had AFVs with armour up to 100mm and convinced others that something better than the then-current 76.2mm gun would be needed. The proposals for putting the F-39 107mm (actually 106.7mm, but who's counting?) into AFVs never really came to anything although I have vague memories of reading something about the non-tank-optimised ZIS version of the gun being put into a number of ad hoc armoured vehicles.
     

Share This Page