Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

the Schwerpunkt

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by aquist, Apr 18, 2006.

  1. aquist

    aquist recruit

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2003
    Messages:
    1,107
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    lots of space is devoted to what battle is the most important, the most pivitol and the most important one of world war two, i ve hear that it was Stalingrad or Midway or Guadalcanal. cases could be made for Normandy for the Ardennes or a host of others, but for a single infantryman the answer is simple. The foxhole that I am in is the most important one in world war two, for me. and the battle to stay alive until 45.
     
  2. Hoosier phpbb3

    Hoosier phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bloomington, Indiana USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I must agree... so I'll simply add an AMEN.

    Tim
     
  3. Simonr1978

    Simonr1978 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Unless you're a German in Stalingrad and arguably the most important Foxholes are the ones the Roumanians were in...

    There is no "Single Infantryman". Warfare is a group effort from the smallest section to the largest Army groups.
     
  4. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    and the normal infaltry men didn't had a clue when the war would be over
    nevertheless, great text, Kriegspfarrer
     
  5. merlin phpbb3

    merlin phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 23, 2004
    Messages:
    2,724
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    middle England
    via TanksinWW2
    aziz

    When I first met my future brother-in-law (AA82nd.Airbourne Div) I asked him what was the first thing he did when he hit the ground, his answer was, "I get my shovel and I dig like ****".
     
  6. Hoosier phpbb3

    Hoosier phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bloomington, Indiana USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Simon:
    If I may... interject in response to the comments made by Kriegspfarrer...

    Within even the largest and most sweeping battles and campaigns, the infantryman finds his war to be a very personal and intimate affair shared by his mate in a foxhole, or between a small squad of men unaware of the "big picture."

    They fight knowing their lives depend on each other, and they often engage in spectacularly unselfish and heroic acts... because of their bond of loyalty and love for their fellow troopers.

    At least that's how I choose to interpret it.

    Cheers.
    Tim
     
  7. phip phpbb3

    phip phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2005
    Messages:
    57
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Delaware, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Amen to Hoosier. Often, those sacrifices are made not only for comrades but even strangers. Combat is a strange, awful, and wonderful thing. It's a shame that the English term "brotherhood" doesn't quite connote the same as the German "brudershaffen." Anyone looking for a most interesting book about war should try J. Glenn Gray's THE WARRIORS.
     

Share This Page