Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Sentinal: External Fuel Tank

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Gunter_Viezenz, Aug 16, 2006.

  1. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I seen picutres of a Sentinal tank with an external fuel tank. The questions I have are in WWII did they use external fuel tanks on teh sentinal? If so could they and would they take it off when entering combat? If so could you assume the Russians had similair approach with external fuel tanks on their tank?
    Edit: http://www.armourinfocus.co.uk/sentinel/index.htm
    added link to the place I seen the pic.
     
  2. Zhukov_2005

    Zhukov_2005 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 19, 2004
    Messages:
    1,652
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Toothless Capital of the World
    via TanksinWW2
    I imagine they would have surely jettisoned the external fuel tanks if they were entering combat. This was standard practise for Russian tankers. One of the last things any crew wanted was to have a giant molotov cocktail explode on their rear end.
     
  3. Blaster

    Blaster New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 21, 2006
    Messages:
    1,687
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Canada
    via TanksinWW2
    These British guys picked the wrong name for this tank. The word Setinel is supposed to describe something powerful, and yet now it;s being used to talk about a tank armed with only a 2 pdr gun and protected by only 40-60mm or so of armor.
     
  4. Gryle

    Gryle New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2005
    Messages:
    148
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    The Sentinel had pretty much the same quick-release setup as used on the Crusader (to which it owes a great deal), Valentine, Matilda etc. It's around a 40 imp. gallon tank (I think) that can be dropped with out leaving the tank. I'm not too sure how it works, probably some sort of siphon that tops of the main tanks so the drop tank is emptied first. If you go to the AWM site http://www.awm.gov.au/ and click on "Search our collections" there are several good photos of the Australian Cruisers, most without the external tank, the Sentinel had a fairly good range even on just it's internal tanks.

    Blaster, the Sentinel is Australian not British, and a Sentinel is simply "One that keeps guard; a sentry." which is fitting as it was in part to guard Australia from possible Japanese raids or invasion. Or at least that's what they thought at the time. And for a 1940 design 30mph, 65mm or armour and a 2 pounder gun is pretty respectable, especially for a country with no experience with tank production, and not even an automobile industry.
     
  5. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Gryle, you hit the nail on the head. Blaster, start doing some research before saying things like that. There was also a version armed with the 17 pdr FYI, a fabulous gun.
     

Share This Page