Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

90 years ago: Jutland

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by Notmi, May 31, 2006.

  1. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    This very same day 90 years ago Battle of Jutland was fought. Hundreds of ships taking part to this massive seabattle. Seabattle that has created more 'What if' -scenarios than any seabattle ever.
     
  2. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    dzeejes, it's raining anniversarys this month. first the hood and bismarck and now the battle of jutland.
    seems may is like hunting season for ships :D

    anyway, it was one big battle (one that i know just very small things. i'll have to learn more about that. after my exams offcours :cool: )
     
  3. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    if you want more details try to get the book:
    jutland, an analysis of the fighting by john campbell
     
  4. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    thanks for the tip. i'll sure try to get a hold on that book
     
  5. Baron

    Baron New Member

    Joined:
    Mar 29, 2006
    Messages:
    76
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Jutland my favorite Battle so much happened at that moment .
     
  6. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Yeah, like Beatty getting half his battlecruisers destroyed. :roll:
     
  7. Quillin

    Quillin New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 3, 2005
    Messages:
    2,313
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Ghent, Belgium
    via TanksinWW2
    hence the famous quote
    "there seems to be something bloody wrong with our ships today"
     
  8. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    There was an interesting program on History Channel. It seems that the prime reason the BC's (and other RN ships) blew up so spectacularly was because they were carrying a large amounts (~50%) of extra ammo. There was apaprently enough room in the magazines for the shells themselves, but the cordite propellant was stacked all around the ship. The RN also put an emphasis on rate of fire, so crews got into the habit of stacking shells and cordite in the open to achieve maximum rate of fire. One bright flash and the cordite goes boom!
     
  9. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    Yeah, BCF was trained for high ROF because that was just about all they could train when deployed in Rosyth. Therefore their gunnery lacked accuracy. On the other hand, main body of RN based on Scapa were training regularly on firing ranges and that really shows when looking at records of Jutland.
     
  10. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I read once that HMS QUEEN MARY was one of the best gunnery ships in the Royal Navy before her loss at Jutland. Was this for her accuracy or just ROF?
     

Share This Page