Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

American Invasion

Discussion in 'What If - Other' started by Hawkerace, May 30, 2007.

  1. DocCasualty

    DocCasualty Member

    Joined:
    Sep 6, 2008
    Messages:
    495
    Likes Received:
    54
    Location:
    Northern Michigan
    No, I believe in this context, my word is correct. The definition of overstatement is: The act or an instance of exaggerating. I maintain my belief that weeks is a gross exaggeration of the time frame involved. Weeks are less than months or years, but the thrust of your comment was that it would take minimal time, which I view as exaggerated. Thank you for your concern though about my proper use of vocabulary!
     
  2. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    Probably everyone the other half knows....good old Kate...She keeps sheep n stuff...everyone mucks in. Farms everywhere, guns everywhere, tractors and tools everywhere...4wd everywhere, wellies everywhere, tools everywhere..which is why in ww2 they tended to be folk picked out as auxilleries and not home guard as such.

    But then she is not normal.
     
  3. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    Sorry, no, I said they would run out in a matter of weeks, i.e. within weeks they would have run out. If you think it would have taken longer that would have been an understatement, if you think supplies would have run out before that it would have been an overstatement. If you think 'weeks' is an overstatement that means you think it would have taken less than several weeks.

    If I were to have exaggerated in this case then I would have claimed it would take more time than it actually would.

    No problem, no charge ;)
     
  4. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I'm at loss to find the source, but I read a news article a long time ago detailing a crime committed by a man who built an armored tank by himself. He smashed through several buildings (including his place of work) while police surrounded his armored vehicle and attempted to bring it down with small arms fire.

    Naturally, this didn't work, so the man smashed into the last building and his vehicle ran into mechanical difficulty. By the time the police managed to pry open the door with some machine tools, the man was already dead, by his own hand...
     
  5. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,047
    Likes Received:
    2,366
    Location:
    Alabama
  6. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    But what kind of a match is this armoured vehicle going to be for say a Tiger or Panther? Sure you could build a vehicle with armour on it, how quickly would it become a metal coffin though?
     
  7. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,047
    Likes Received:
    2,366
    Location:
    Alabama
    It wouldn't, I was jusst posting the links to answer his Q.
     
  8. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,136
    Likes Received:
    904
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona

    The guy was in Colorado. He was upset with the bank and a local businessman. Felt they ruined him. He welded 1/4 and 1/2" plate over the roll cab and engine of his bulldozer and proceeded to flatten much of the small town he lived in. A policeman finally got on the machine and was able to shoot through a vision slit killing him.
     
  9. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,136
    Likes Received:
    904
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona

    APC's and armored cars are better than no armor at all....
     
  10. mikebatzel

    mikebatzel Dreadnaught

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,185
    Likes Received:
    406
    Of course it would be no match for a Tiger Tank but it would be invaluable when fighting infantry
     
  11. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
  12. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    Not so sure, considering that the infantry they would be fighting would be trained to deal with real tanks. Some sort of a-team style improv job wouldn't last long.

    See now this is an interesting turn for the the thread to take. I mean what kind of vehicle do you think you could produce in terms of mobility, firepower and armour?
     
  13. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,136
    Likes Received:
    904
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
  14. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I'm thinking that armored cars and bulldozers etc. would be a "one-shot" deal. Ambush and inflict as much damage on the occupying forces, but this would probably result in the loss of the vehicle(s)
     
  15. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    They were used against British army in Northern Ireland many times.

    If your already invaded and are under occupation and acting as partisans, they would indeed be one shot wanders....pretty easy to follow as you drive back home and difficult to park on road outside house. Probably have dogs on leads and big men with guns watching as you park...ahhh.....sir....you come with us yes? Or worse.

    If your using it to ambush a trained army who are on edge because they are an occupying force, then as in Ireland you wont get too close. Apart from one wrecked station and a major firefight.... I cant think of many others where vehicles like this were used to good effect. Many littered the ground after prospective ambushes and attacks with trails of blood leading into the countryside or alley ways.

    If your attacking an invading army with all the weaponary they have for that purpose then I dont give much hope for trading the vehicle in afterwards.

    Doesnt stop the art of resistance...but what a waste of patriots. Better to hit and run than hit and die.
     
    Wolfy likes this.
  16. mikebatzel

    mikebatzel Dreadnaught

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,185
    Likes Received:
    406
    Stefan, it almost sounds like you are advocating that it's better to fight with nothing because your enemy is trained to deal with whatever you can come up with. I realize that whatever you can build can be destroyed by your enemy, but then again, I would feel much better about my odds if I'm behind anything with some kind of protection then if I was just out in the open.

    Also, what would be the reaction of the enemy when they see some sort of improvized armoured vehicle being used against them. It's got to have some kind of demoralizing effect.
     
  17. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    Actually no not in present years anyway...Most were destroyed while approaching sangars or barracks or patrols only a few years ago in dear old blightyland... The moral of the troops was actually quite high when they got the chance to blow them from here to eternity.

    But I suppose we are talking ww2 and there may be a difference in the perception over history.
     
  18. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    Sorry, you miss my point, it isn't a question of whether it is better to fight but whether you are able to fight. It was suggested that US partisans would build armoured vehicles, which is fine but if they rapidly go from 'armoured vehicles' to 'funeral pyres' then how long is such resistance going to last and how much is it going to achieve?

    I am with Urqh on the latter part, I imagine morale would be pretty high as the feared partisans rumble from the woods in an armoured ford truck and are engulfed in flames.
     
  19. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    This talk reminds me of "technicals" and the SAS.

    I can imagine many of these around in the US to conduct fast surprise raids, etc.

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  20. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    But didnt your guys hammer them in downtown Mogadishu?
     

Share This Page