Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

BESt battleaship/battle-cruiser?

Discussion in 'The War at Sea' started by ray243, Sep 2, 2004.

  1. ray243

    ray243 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2004
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    u also need to have more ammo than other ships
     
  2. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    But it's a hoot, nonetheless!!! :lol:
     
  3. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I think you do, too! ;)
     
  4. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2

    That or the game programer was German
     
  5. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    One ship class never mentioned is the ALASKA-class. These two vessels, ALASKA and GUAM, were designated battlecruisers and carried 12-inch guns. They were well-armored, fast, and maneuverable. In fact, they garnered nothing but praise from those who either served on them or saw them in action. I pick them as the best battlecruiser.
     
  6. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    They were fast, yes. The 12in gun was a pretty good one, though the mounts caused some complaints. Maneuverability was actually bad, really bad. Armor was okay. I do dislike the Alaskas, though, because they were horribly vulnerable to torpedoes. And no increase in DP weaponry compared to a Cleveland less than half their size.
     
  7. liang

    liang New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Speed aside, I take it that the Alaska is outmatched by the Hood and Kongo, and probably fairy equal to the Dunkerque and Scharnhorst.
     
  8. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    I think Alaska and Kongo make a very close match-up, depending on Alaska's opportunity to capitalize on her radar. Radar would be the only thing that would keep Alaska from getting steam-rolled by Dunkerque.
     
  9. liang

    liang New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Great point, without radar you are sailing and firing blindly. No matter how big your guns are or how fast you can fire them, you still need to hit your targets.
     
  10. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I have read some books and articles that have stated that radar aiming is no more accurate than doing so visually.
     
  11. Tiornu

    Tiornu Member

    Joined:
    Apr 29, 2004
    Messages:
    928
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    Radar ranging is very accurate. Radar deflection, however, is not on a par with optical readings. In addition, there are cases in which radar spotting will be impossible even when targets are clearly detected. At Empress Augusta Bay, only 10% of the American CL salvoes were spotted. It made for some very low hit percentages.
     
  12. corpcasselbury

    corpcasselbury New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 30, 2003
    Messages:
    4,356
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    High Point, North Carolina, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Yep. Technology is not the "genie in a bottle" that some people think it is; not all problems are best solved by some high tech item fresh from the R&D people. But a lot of folks still believe that you can bring any dificulty under control if you just throw technology at it. Read Arthur C. Clarke's short story "Superiority" to see what can come of that attitude.
     

Share This Page