Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

German tanks of WW2

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by LRusso216, Feb 28, 2009.

  1. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    As someone who is not as familiar with the weapons of WW2 as many of those who post here, I have been searching the net for information on my own. Because so many of you seem knowledgeable about the various incarnations of the Panzers, I searched around to see what I could find. I came across a site dedicated to the development of the Panzer. I apologize in advance if this site is one of common knowledge, but it was new to me. There are hundreds of spectacular pictures in the Panzer walk-around section as well as specs for the various models. I found it quite informative. I expect, if I am wrong about it, I will hear from those in the know. Anyway, check out:

    German King Tiger tank - development history and photos
     
    formerjughead likes this.
  2. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
  3. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Nice find.......I put it in my favorites
     
  4. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    Well, I recommend New Vanguard/Osprey's pamphlets. They have very competent technical books on every tank model of WWII as well as containing analysis of some tactical engagements. I am not very sure I like what I am reading in the link you have provided. A military strategist would have had very different things in mind when commenting the Tiger II's combat service record, for example. Achtungpanzer is generally a good source though.
     
  5. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    The have one that is about the Panther tank vs. the T-34/85 in the Ukraine battles that makes a balanced account of both machines.
     
  6. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    I have had Achtung Panzer in my online list forever it seems, and enjoy the site. But that said, in order to balance things out a bit I use these as well, especially the second one since it includes data on armor thickness, and main gun armor penetration by weapon.

    TANKS!

    and:

    World War II Vehicles - Advanced Squad Leader

    and:

    Tanks

    These are the three "online" references I personally enjoy, and by comparing and contrasting between them most ethnocentric bias can be eliminated.
     
    Hufflepuff and LRusso216 like this.
  7. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,290
    Likes Received:
    2,607
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks to all for the info. Great, just what I needed, the chance to spend even more hours glued to my monitor reading, now about tanks. My wife says, "Hey, guys, take a leap".:grumble:
     
  8. delta36

    delta36 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 1, 2009
    Messages:
    66
    Likes Received:
    2
    Back in the day if you wanted to take out a Tiger II, your best bet was to aim for the tracks
     
  9. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    you got that right but to finish it you must throw a grenade in the hatch
     
  10. Miguel B.

    Miguel B. Member

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2008
    Messages:
    956
    Likes Received:
    67
    OR it's side armour. Or pop some phosphorous rounds at it and wait till the crew bails out before they get suffocated by the smoke. Or call a Jabo to throw some rockets into it... So many ways to take down a hulking 68 ton beast...


    Cheers...
     
  11. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    Or call artillery. A Tiger II attack would help you to get cleared for Corps artillery. After a barrage of 12+ battalions of 105 and 155, almost everything dies.
     
  12. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    or you could just be crazy and try to take it out with a m9a1 rocket launcher or as it is better known a bazooka
     
  13. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I have never read about a company level attack or defense by Tiger IIs...the majority of their missions seemed to be merely at the platoon level at this late stage of the war.
     
  14. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    I have read about several Tiger II company attacks in The Longest Battle by Harry Yeides about the battles of the Ruhr. Actually, whole sPz. regiments committed to counterattack in critical sectors, but in reality they could not put more than a dozen or so to the field. And nothing survives 155 round hits.
     
    Hufflepuff likes this.
  15. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    thats probably because when you breach in one flank you can surround the enemy and then slowly knock them off until eventually you take over the battlefield and thats what they were trying to do
     
  16. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    How did these attacks fare? So generally the Tiger II was stopped by artillery fire?
     
  17. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    well think about it artillery fire was,nt always accurate so tanks did,nt always get destroyed the first time around
     
  18. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
  19. drakhl

    drakhl Member

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    15
    Likes Received:
    3
    The problem with many German early model panzers such as the Tiger II or the early Panthers was that more of them were lost or put out of action due to maintenance problems or mobility-related kills rather than actually being destroyed.

    As for a 155mm hit on the top of a tank.. sure that'll kill it. More often than not it would land nearby and blow the tracks off. Even today a direct hit on the top of an abrams will probably destroy the tank, but its rare to get such a precise hit.

    As far as I recall rockets from a Jabo (german word for Jagdbomber or fighter bomber) wouldn't do that much against a heavy armoured beast except cause a mobility kill (unless a direct top hit). More often that not it would make the crew abandon the tank rather than destroy it. More effective would be the guns like the 30+mm on the P39 or the Russian IL2 series to bust em up. The Stuka G's 37mm guns were fairly similar in that regard.

    The top armour of tanks has always been very thin even to the modern times. There were even reports of 50 caliber rounds penetrating the tops of Panzer IIs, IIIs and IVs which had less than 10mm of top armour.
     
  20. razin

    razin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    83
    There has been a fair bit of discussion on this subject in this forum recently, try

    from post #26 and

    form post #68.

    Obviously as the rockets are fired from above they tend to hit the upper portion of an armoured vehicle. In NWE about 5% of Tanks and Heavy SPGs could be attributed by destruction by Tactical attack aircraft -fighter-bombers and light bombers, it doesn't sound much but the main effect was to deny German armour movement during the day.

    The standard British 3inch rocket had a 60lb 27.5Kg warhead, with 6.4kg of explosive in the SAP (semi-armoured piecing) rocket, the similar GP (General purpose) AP rocket had a slightly smaller 5.8kg content and was capable of piercing 85mm assuming optimum contact angle. The explosive content of the SAP rocket is similar to the 5.5inch shell, so is quite damaging.

    The U.S. main rocket was the 5inch FFAR High explosive with a 20kg warhead and 2.9kg content and the later HVAR rockets in HE with 3.5kg content and AP which had no explosive content. They had about twice the range of the British 60lb rocket. But the AP round was capable of only 38mm armour. The HE content of the rocket is slightly more than a 105mm M1 Howitzer.

    The accuracy of both types were poor having a 1% hit probaility on a tank size target at normal launch conditions (for the British rocket). However it must be remembered that the Typhoon/Tempest could put down 8 and sometimes on special missions 16 rockets and had standard armament of 4 x 20mm cannon.

    the British used Hurricanes with 2 x 40mm S cannon until replaced by 60lb rockets. The 40mm S gun was used in the North African Desert and in Italy, They were incredably accurate, but were replaced for NWE service and that is the most telling thing, rockets despite their inaccuracy had huge destructive power.

    The cannon on the P39 was a 37mm cannon M4.

    The IL2 had 2 x 23mm VYa-23 cannon which was not a great weapon. It also carried 8 x Rs 82 and 4 x RS132 which were not popular again the accuracy was poor. The Il2 could carry up to 200 PTAB bomblets- a small hollow charge cluster bomb.
     
    Triple C likes this.

Share This Page