Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Here's chance for Carl, Skipper and the rest of the collectors to bid on a REAL WWII gun

Discussion in 'Weapons' started by Ken The Kanuck, Mar 22, 2011.

  1. Ken The Kanuck

    Ken The Kanuck Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2010
    Messages:
    1,282
    Likes Received:
    474
  2. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
  3. Skipper

    Skipper Kommodore

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    24,984
    Likes Received:
    2,386
    A bit too heavy for me and actually I don't collect weapons , but I suppose it's a good opportunity for those who do and have space. Shipping would be a challenge.
     
  4. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Reminds me of when I was at Dahlgren. They had a shock tube that they had determined was excess to requirements and put out the word it was available. An air force installation thought they could use it so said they'd take it and asked some particulars about the what kind of truck they should send. The tube was big enough that some of my friends there skate boarded in it and it was either a half mile or a mile long....

    The airforce decided that they weren't really able to make use of it ... :)
     
  5. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    It would be interesting to see which of the Iowa's those barrels had cycled through.
     
  6. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    At one point there were a bunch of 16" barrels at Dahlgren. These were manufactured for the Monatanas or were spares. These may be those barrels. Or they may be barrels for coastal defence batteries as it was an army site. I suspect worn out 16" barrels would have been scrapped already. Although come to think of it I believe that gun had a liner which was replaced when wear got too bad and the weight corresponds to a complete barrel not just a liner or a barrel without a liner.

    Just remembered there were a couple of Iowas cancelled before completion as well.
     
  7. Victor Gomez

    Victor Gomez Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    1,292
    Likes Received:
    115
    Demillers dilemma here....how do you chop them up enough to meet government specs then transport to steel factory for feed stock. Think how many of today's autos can be made from a single segment of the barrel. These are the ultimate challenge to "forging your sword into plowshares."
     
  8. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    Hawthorne Army Depot started life as 'Hawthorne Naval Ammunition Depot'. If you roll through the pictures there are several picturres of the various breaches that are Stamped 1944; one in particular has several date stamp where the gun had been re-arsenaled several times:
    [​IMG]

    These barrels were more than likely intended to arm the Illinois (BB-65) and Kentucky (BB-66) and were kept as spares should the need arise. The Montana program was scrapped in favor of carrier production early in the War :
    The question I have: How does this affect the re-activation of the Iowa's should it be deemed necessary? after all they are kept in a state of preserved readiness and can be reactivated.
     
  9. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Good spot.
    I agree although the other possibilities are still there.
    From what I recall the Montana's were cancelled about 3 months before construction was schedule to start on the first couple. So I'd consider it still a possiblity. Depends on how many tubes were made. Certainly the 18 for the next two Iowas would have been acquired before the Montana barrels would. I'm also not sure how many spares were made. SoDak had a couple of barrels damaged and need them replaced and I think Iowa lost one in the turret explosion so a few were needed over the years.
    Again my understanding is that the barrels are designed to accept new liners when they've had enough wear and the barrels are in pretty decent shape now I believe. Furthermre some of the new propellants have vastly increased the number of rounds that can be fired as has the fact that not many AP rounds were ever fired and HE rounds have a lower wear factor. I think the navweapons site goes into some of this and links off of it do.
     
  10. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    The Mark VII 16"/50 would have been used on the Montana's had they been commissioned; but, these barrels are all stamped 1944 well after the cancellation of the Montana program in 1942.

    The idea of replacement barrels is that the barrels can be cycled through the system, and exchanged, allowing for the ship to remain in service. So it's possible that the barrel in the picture could have seen service on more than one of the Iowas in more than one conflict.
     
  11. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Where's that embarrassed emoteocon when you need it. I guess it's possible someone forgot to cancel them as well but that's pretty remote. I simply didn't catch the signifigance of the date. (technically the Montanas were cancelled in 43 but they construction was suspended in 42).
    My understanding is that it was easier to change the liners than it was to change the barrels. However when I tried to look up the references that I thought mentioned it I didn't find them and may have misread what I did find so this is an open question.
     
  12. Gebirgsjaeger

    Gebirgsjaeger Ace

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    290
    Hahaha, it wood be nice to see our customs trying to declare this! And it would be a challenge to find a shooters disciplin for that, otherwise it isnĀ“t allowed to own. Maybe " Sporty Naval Gun"!
     
  13. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    First, what a waste!?!

    Second, just where in heck do they think I can pick up a few Shells from? so why demill them? I may have a few good connections for militaria but???????

    I guess if they can redily destroy thousands of harmless M-1 Garands, then why not destroy these gun barrels?
     
  14. Skipper

    Skipper Kommodore

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    24,984
    Likes Received:
    2,386
    Want to keep those home and protect the Rio grande Carl, or are you planning the Independence of Texas ? :eek::) They would be a bit big for a weapon rack in a pick-up truck, even for a Texan wouldn't they ? :D
     
  15. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    The turrets are not particularly spacious and I would think anything bigger than a breach lock would pose a problem.
     
  16. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    Heh heh, they could have used one at the Alamo ;-))
     
  17. gst121

    gst121 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    4
    I would want one, except for the few million dollars in shipping that comes along with it. It is a pretty cool site, but why would anyone need minesweeping equipment?
     
  18. formerjughead

    formerjughead The Cooler King

    Joined:
    Dec 29, 2008
    Messages:
    5,627
    Likes Received:
    1,006
    LOL....Doesn't everyone have mine sweeping and degousing gear?

    That site is for public auction and is a part of The Defense Reutilization Maintenance and Disposal Branch of the Department of Defense. Very often items are sold for re-use, re sale or recycling. Everyone from local municipalities to surplus stores and recycling contractors buy the stuff. Most of the time there is required 'Demilitariztion' on items that are either weapons or technology. They auction everything from fork lifts to whip antennas.
     
  19. Gebirgsjaeger

    Gebirgsjaeger Ace

    Joined:
    Jun 11, 2010
    Messages:
    4,333
    Likes Received:
    290
    Seems you have a good neighbourhood! LOL
     
  20. gst121

    gst121 Member

    Joined:
    Dec 27, 2010
    Messages:
    109
    Likes Received:
    4
    LOL. Also did anyone notice nuclear reactors for sale category. Or space vehicles. Hopefully terrorists don't figure out about this site. They could outfit a whole army.
     

Share This Page