Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Japan Was Already Beaten and Starving When We Dropped Nukes

Discussion in 'Atomic Bombs In the Pacific' started by Michael Timothy Griffith, Jan 29, 2022.

  1. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member Patron   WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    4,865
    "The best way to lie is to tell the truth, then stop."
     
  2. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    When the first test bomb was used Oppenheimer said "Now we are all sons of bitches".
     
  3. R Leonard

    R Leonard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,053
    Likes Received:
    694
    Location:
    The Old Dominion
    If you always tell the truth, the whole truth, you never have to remember what you said.
     
  4. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member Patron   WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    4,865
    But your marriage might be very short. :(
     
  5. Biak

    Biak Adjutant Staff Member Patron  

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    7,566
    Likes Received:
    1,713
    I believe with thread topics like this the response should be, 'Yes they were'. The End.
     
  6. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    9,996
    Likes Received:
    2,510
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    That was Kenneth Bainbridge, he said it to Oppenheimer after Trinity.
     
  7. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,722
    Likes Received:
    1,772
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Whenever I hear this take against bomb use I start to formulate the structure of a very detailed and lengthy response, then I just get tired and decide against it. Ultimately this is about applying presentism to a complex ethical decision made in the past, which is a basic failure of historiography.

    I'll keep it as simple as is reasonable. You are operating in a total war scenario with unconditional surrender as a goal, against an enemy that regularly uses suicide attacks against you, and had perpetrated ongoing war crimes (reprisals for Doolittle, Nanking, Bataan Death March, etc). You have in your possession a weapon that you spent $2 Billion USD (in 1945 dollars), money that could have been used to expand/increase many other existing weapon systems, a weapon that has a very good chance to end the war and cease the human meatgrinder that has spanned multiple years with tens of million of people dead. Even without direct combat with the enemy every day that passes you are losing soldiers, sailors, and servicemen.

    It would have been unethical not to use such a war ending weapon to do what it was explicitly designed for.
     
    A-58, GRW, OpanaPointer and 2 others like this.
  8. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member Patron  

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,114
    Likes Received:
    2,482
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Well said, Otto. Too frequently we judge the actions of the past knowing the outcome of a decision. We cannot presume to know what was in the minds of those tasked with making a difficult choice. This especially is true when faced with a conundrum too complex to be easily made. They made their choice and it difficult to fault them. Hindsight is always 20/20.
     
  9. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    2,190
    It wasn’t just about a difficult decision, or Japan being beaten even…two other factors were that the US was tired of war, communities were tired of losing its men…Any idea that would bring a swift close to the war, end in a surrender and to do it with minimal or no US loss was an attractive option. Another reason is that the US wanted to test the brand new weapons in real war scenario…One must look at the USSR here and realise the US already new that they would probably be the next enemy and wanted them and the world to know they had this weapon and it worked…A bunch of factors led to the use of the weapons.
    Let’s not forget Japan surprise attacked the US and they vowed revenge…military and political statements were being made with the use of the weapon.
     
  10. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Also the emperor was god to the people. Japan would not surrender without his order, and I doubt he intended to do that. Also removing the "god" glory would be hard or even impossible to remove by outside forces, and the nation would fight to the last person. I recall reading about breaking the god "mode" from the emperor in some way.
     
  11. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member Patron   WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    4,865
  12. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    9,996
    Likes Received:
    2,510
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    There were many ideas on ending the war.

    Lemay and the "Bomber Mafia" expected the war to be over when they ran out of targets(except this didn't work with Germany). Invasion - which only appealed to MacArthur(and such an invasion was an anathema to prewar planning). Blockade - liked by the navy but was expected to continue the war for another year and a half to two years.

    Sending a message to Russia is a figment of modern revisionists - The Soviets marched through many bombed out German cities to have a great appreciation for Western air power...Whether a city is destroyed with 1 bomb or 20,000 bombs...The message is still the same, and very clear at that.
     
    CAC likes this.
  13. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    9,996
    Likes Received:
    2,510
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    [​IMG]

    Which "God" here are you talking about?
    The one on the left or right?
     
  14. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    No problem for me if your knowledge from the books say the emperor was not considered god, and the US did not think about the best way to remove his heavenly powers that the Japanese believed he had inherited.
     
  15. USMCPrice

    USMCPrice Idiot at Large

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    4,850
    Likes Received:
    1,855
    Location:
    God's Country
    I think he was referring to MacArthur's god complex.
     
  16. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member Patron   WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    4,865
    And, of course, NOT using the bombs would allow all and sundry to say "You had a potential war ender and didn't use it? Do you like seeing GIs and Japanese children die?" Because, as usual, the object isn't find the truth of the matter, it's to attack, attack, attack.
     
    CAC likes this.
  17. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    I apologize. I misunderstood.
     
    CAC likes this.
  18. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,462
    Likes Received:
    2,196
    Thanx. I missed it completely.
     
  19. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member Patron   WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    15,670
    Likes Received:
    4,865
    I'm going to need help there. There was no difference between dropping a bomb on Nagasaki and dropping one on some patch of Utah desert.

    And we were still debating whether or not to share the technology with the USSR.
     
    Last edited: Feb 7, 2022
  20. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    8,053
    Likes Received:
    2,190
    There is a big difference to the world and enemy between a film of a big explosion…and a film of the devastation it could do to a city. Also, it showed potential enemies that the US had already reduced it to a deliverable size and could genuinely deliver this device to a city, and hit it, and devastate it…
     

Share This Page