Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Mark II SPG?

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by Ilhawk, Feb 14, 2016.

  1. Ilhawk

    Ilhawk New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    44
    Is this a Mark II converted to an SPG. Located at Carentan France and used against 327 in Marina area? S2 reported as Mark 2.

    Looks sort of like Hotchkiss chasis?
     

    Attached Files:

  2. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Fairly certain the chassis is from a Czech Pz 38(t). It even has the same odd gap between the two center-most road wheels. Some small modifications were clearly made to the front hull and major mods to the superstructure. The original armament would have been up-gunned to deal with late war armor fielded by the allies, as the original 37mm wouldn't have been of much use. Not sure what the new gun is, the Marder line was based upon this chassis, but I guess it could even possibly be a captured Soviet model gun?

    I've attached the photo from the wikipedia entry on the topic: By Werner Willmann - Own work, CC BY 2.5, https://commons.wikimedia.org/w/index.php?curid=1311793
     

    Attached Files:

    von Poop likes this.
  3. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Looks most like a SdKfz 138 Marder III with a 75mm German made gun. The muzzle brake is cropped but the section under the barrel matches photos of the 138 Marder,
     
  4. Ilhawk

    Ilhawk New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    44
    Thx!

    Is it related to Mark 2?
     
  5. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    They both server a similar important role at the same time in the early war, but the Pz II was of German design, whilst the Pz 38(t) was a Czech vehicle and they are of independent lineage. When the Reich occupied Czechoslovakia in 1938, they incorporated the existing Czech AFVs into their armed forces and used their construction facilities to make some additional combat vehicles. The (t) designation in the Pz 38(t) indicated a vehicle of Czech origin.
     
  6. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Marder III Ausf. H.

    Which, as Otto has pointed out was based on the Pz 38(t) chassis.
     
  7. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
  8. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    The initial photo posted is quite confusing, specifically the large open T-34 style hatch on the right front hull. I've not seen a hatch of this size on the t-38(t) chassis, but it's not entirely unexpected with the penchant of the Reich's armament industry to make a multitude of adjustments to existing vehicle design and construction.
     
  9. Ilhawk

    Ilhawk New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    44
    Thx all. Amazing!
     
  10. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Your "hatch" is the gun travel lock
    [​IMG]

    Folded forward
    [​IMG]
     
    Otto likes this.
  11. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    So it is. I was aware of the lock, the grainy shadowing fooled me. Good eye Takao!
     
  12. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,740
    Likes Received:
    820
    Looks like Christie type suspension and rubber road wheels. Wonder how often rubber road wheels (without its' tracks) were actually used. Seeing as how there weren't a lot of hard surfaces that wouldn't turn to ice or mud back then.
     
  13. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Don't let the large wheels fool you. The road wheels were mounted on bogies, two bogies to a side - Hence the gap that Otto mentioned earlier.
    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,740
    Likes Received:
    820
    Is that rubber around each bogie- would there be rubber (rather than steel) if they weren't intended to be towed or driven without tracks (to avoid track wear).
     
  15. Ilhawk

    Ilhawk New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    44
    You think those are rubber wheels and not just disabled?

    It was positioned near the church near the marina in Carentan. The Germans largely abandoned the city on the 12th after heavy pressure largely from 327. Co G was treat by snipers which caused that co 20 casualties that day. It had been positioned to confront the attack from the canal area. 2nd battalion s 2 in 2 different reports said Mark 3 and mark 2. Two of them.
     
  16. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Most WW2 tank wheels have tyres. It's not an indication of Wheel-cum-track or trackless ability.

    Though there were a few exceptions, some clever-buggery was required in steering and drivetrain.:
    [​IMG]
    & http://www.liveleak.com/view?i=fa2_1423929637&comments=1


    And all that 'Wheel-cum-track' business.
    [​IMG]




    Funny that Marder should come up. Was just discussing them on Friendface after a chap on 2T raised this British Marder-esque Valentine project:
    [​IMG]
     
    Poppy and Otto like this.
  17. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,740
    Likes Received:
    820
  18. Ilhawk

    Ilhawk New Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2015
    Messages:
    383
    Likes Received:
    44
  19. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    To the victor, the scrap.
    Marder 2 (Said to be in Milovice)

    [​IMG]
     
    Ilhawk likes this.
  20. Otto

    Otto Spambot Nemesis Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2000
    Messages:
    9,781
    Likes Received:
    1,818
    Location:
    DFW, Texas
    Reviewing the original photo (again), I don't see any tracks at all. Often a destroyed AFV with tracks will have the tracks knocked off and lying on the ground, partially on the guidewheels and partially on the ground.

    As you noted, the vehicle you posted appears to have no tracks anywhere to be seen, so it's logical that it didn't have any at the time of it's capture. I'd imagine the Allied troops arrived during it's untracked movement, and the crew decided to abandon the vehicle rather than fight it out in a vehicle with hobbled mobility.
     
    Poppy and Ilhawk like this.

Share This Page