Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Military linguo, oxymorons, misnomers.....

Discussion in 'Non-World War 2 History' started by liang, Dec 22, 2004.

  1. liang

    liang New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    I was always curious on the origins of certain military terminologies, as well as poking fun at oxymorons and misnomers.

    For oxymoron, how about the "Peacekeeper" revolver, and the "battle of Britain" as a misnomer (please spare another debate), where did the term Guerilla warfare comes from?
     
  2. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    From "Merriam-Webster's Online Dictionary"

    Main Entry: 1guer·ril·la
    Variant(s): or gue·ril·la /g&-'ri-l&, ge-, g(y)i-/
    Function: noun
    Etymology: Spanish guerrilla, from diminutive of guerra war, of Germanic origin; akin to Old High German werra strife -- more at WAR
    Date: 1809
    : a person who engages in irregular warfare especially as a member of an independent unit carrying out harassment and sabotage
     
  3. liang

    liang New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2003
    Messages:
    830
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    USA
    via TanksinWW2
    So are the insurgents in Iraq consider guerillas or terrorists?

    I got another oxymoron, "military intelligence" (kind of lame I know), help me out lads.
     
  4. Kellhound

    Kellhound New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Spain
    via TanksinWW2
    Well, guerrillas fight armies, terrorists generally only kill civilians to cause... terror.
     
  5. DesertWolf

    DesertWolf Member

    Joined:
    Nov 6, 2004
    Messages:
    848
    Likes Received:
    1
    via TanksinWW2
    Well Liang, the situation is much more complicated than that :) .


    Some insurgents are terrorists in that they do in fact kill civilians, and still others are not. The means to acheiving their end is different, with one being wrong while the other correct.

    But the real question is this: Is their goal or cause just?
     

Share This Page