Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Most cost-effective small arms and vehicles

Discussion in 'Small Arms and Edged Weapons' started by Bonzo, Mar 18, 2009.

  1. Bonzo

    Bonzo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    What small arms and vehicles during the war do you consider to be the most cost effective?

    My guess would be the SOviet ppsh41. Their enginneering doctrine dictated that the weapons they created had to be simple, rugged, and cheap. However, the ppsh41 was surprisingly reliable and effective. ANother candidate imo could be the STEN.

    Vehicles would include the T-34 (obviously) and the sherman

    I may a thing or two but I certainly do not know as much as most of the people here in the forums so don't be scared to educate me. Try not to be too sarcastic though.
     
  2. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    The Sten was a often unreliable weapon with inferior firing characteristics- the German counterpart was also cheap but it was far superior. The Sherman was around the same cost as a Panzer IV- and only on par.

    A lot of German and Soviet small arms were very cost effective. The Allies simply didn't need to be in this area..

    Small arms:

    STG-44 Assault rifle (cheaper than a K98 bolt action rifle)
    PPSH-41
    PPS-43 (many say the best SMG of the war)
    MP-40
    MG-42
    Bazookas
    Panzerfaust
    Panzershreck (around the same price as a K98 bolt action rifle..)

    Tanks:

    T-34/76
    T-34/85
    STUG III
     
  3. JCFalkenbergIII

    JCFalkenbergIII Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 23, 2008
    Messages:
    10,480
    Likes Received:
    426
    Fat Man and Little Boy. Best bang for your buck.
     
  4. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    Probably 80mm mortars for all sides, too.
     
  5. Bonzo

    Bonzo Member

    Joined:
    Jan 22, 2009
    Messages:
    18
    Likes Received:
    0
    The mp 40 and the mp 44 arent really prime examples of cost effectiveness. THe MP-40 was over engineered, delicate, and prone to jamming. Not really up to par with other mass produced smgs.

    THe STg-44 although great, suffered from a short service length therefore reducing its effectiveness.

    At least thats what iv'e heard. Feel free to correct me
     
  6. razin

    razin Member

    Joined:
    Dec 30, 2008
    Messages:
    675
    Likes Received:
    83
    Rarely if even mentioned in this type of thread

    Willys Jeeps,
    GMC IHC and Studebaker 2.5ton 6x 6 trucks
    Canadian Military Patern, Commercial and modified Commericial Trucks
     
  7. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    What I know is that that the MP40 was maybe two to three times cheaper than a K98 and, these problems aside- if kept clean, was a smg with good firing characteristics. Allied troops- Soviet and the rest often acquired them readily.

    The STG-44 was generally given to men with a short service life....just like the G-43 semi-auto rifle.
     
  8. paratrooper506

    paratrooper506 Member

    Joined:
    Jan 17, 2009
    Messages:
    693
    Likes Received:
    2
    what about the m3a1 grease gun thats a cheap reliable but really ugly gun
     

Share This Page