The BMW thread got me wondering - Is there much debate in the modelling world re weathered versus sparkling new finish ? I know that weathering adds authenticity to many dioramas but surely vehicles spent a significant part of there life looking pretty clean and new - particularly as most militaries were/are very hot on things like maintenance, cleaning, painting etc ... ... is mint condition the purest way and best way to view an AFV ? ... is a model sterile without context - such as weathering and dioramas ? ... is weathering actually completely out of context if the model is not in a diorama ? ... how much of the additional work is just modellers doing things simply because they can ? I'm interested to read your opinions.
I think it mostly depends on the modeler. Adding weathering and non-factory issue items to models is a way for the modeler to advance his skills. However, if one wants to get into realism, I think weathering, etc. may be too common. You would also have to look at the particular model. If it is a kit used in a combat diorama, then weathering and extra stowage should be used since a clean tank would look really out of place in what should be a muddy field or jungle.
