who was better. Rommel or Patton? both were men of action and the offence. once they had a breakthrough they drove there tanks deep into the enemy, both liked it to take a risk. the only bad thing about Rommel was that he couldn't fight defensivly The bad thing about Patton was that he didn't concerned his flanks (just look at his breakthrough towards brittany. his corridor was for some days only a couple miles wide and he lets his whole 3th army race through it. anyway, what do you guys think?