Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Senate vote, Pearl Harbor, FDR, Kimmel, Short & Marshall

Discussion in 'Pearl Harbor' started by DogFather, Jun 11, 2010.

  1. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    "That Kimmel did not receive all information is irrelevant to the matter'.

    It is very relevent to the matter. Kimmel should have been sent all info
    reguarding, the base he was trying to protect, Pearl Harbor.

    My understanding is that some info was not given, because of fear that
    our code breaking would be exposed. I don't remember where I read this.

    So, here is some more info on Kimmel & Short not getting decoded messages:

    During a 1944 naval inquiry, Captain Laurance Safford, the leading cryptologist responsible for decoding intercepted Japanese messages, courageously testified on what he and his office knew:
    On December 1, we had definite information from three independent sources that Japan was going to attack Britain and the United States ...
    On December 4, 1941, we received definite information from two more independent sources that Japan would attack the United States and Britain, but would maintain peace with Russia. At 9:00 p.m. (Washington time), December 6, 1941, we received positive information that Japan would declare war against the United States, at a time to be specified thereafter. This information was positive and unmistakable and was made available to Military [US Army] Intelligence at this same time. Finally at 10:15 a.m. (Washington time), December 7, 1941 [about 5:00 a.m. Hawaii time], we received positive information ... that the Japanese declaration of war would be presented to the Secretary of State at 1:00 p.m. (Washington time) that date.
    All decoded messages, Safford explained, were promptly passed on to the President and other key civilian and military personnel. Yet both Kimmel and Short were kept in the dark about the most pertinent of these messages. The responsibility for failing to pass along this critically important information to the Hawaii commanders, Beach writes, belonged to Admiral Harold Stack, General George Marshall, and Vice Admiral Richmond Turner.

    Here is my source: Institute for Historical Review

    Scapegoats -- A Defense of Kimmel and Short at Pearl Harbor (review)
     
  2. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    I would like to know what about "Magic" have I said that is not intelligent.
    What you are really doing here is more name calling....I'm not intelligent,
    I guess I must be dumb....these seems to be your message.
     
  3. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    That's your opinion but it seems a rather uninformed one. For one thing I suspect you don't have any idea of the sheer volume of paper you just suggested get dumped on the Admiral's desk. For another "need to know" is determined by factors other than local "nice to have". Then there's the question of whether or not this additional info could reasonably be expected to change any of his actions.
     
  4. R Leonard

    R Leonard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    780
    Location:
    The Old Dominion
    DF-

    If copies of ALL the intercepted, decoded, and translated MAGIC messages were dumped on Kimmel's desk, exactly what words, in which message, would have caused him to place the Pacific Fleet on alert in time for the attack on the morning of 7 December?
     
  5. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    Kimmel should have been given this info:

    Japanese government had divided Pearl Harbor into five areas and was seeking minute berthing information as to the berthing of ships of the fleet in those areas, which was vitally significant.

    If your read my past posts you will see it.
     
  6. syscom3

    syscom3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    183
    Question/comment -

    Regardless of what type of warning message Kimmel was supposed to get; didnt the events of the prior couple of weeks dictate that both the army and navy impliment some type of elevated alert for all days/nights?

    Even if they navy was short of PBY's, theres nothing stopping them from using subs and other small ships as early warning pickets. The ships in harbor could have also been at a higher state of readiness, and that could have limited some of the damage they received. Same with the army. Why couldnt they disperse more of their fighters? Not all, but more than a few.
     
  7. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    I didn't say you were unintelligent, I said you can't discuss MAGIC intelligently unless you've done some real research, not just quote mining. I can't discuss string theory intelligently, and, Buddha willing, I never will.

    You're getting treated ungently because you won't do the work to talk about this intelligently. There's a way to fix that. Can you guess what it is?
     
  8. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    Call it the BOMB PLOT, and note that the IJN didn't use it. It was just short hand to save telegraph fees. It was nothing special. The Japanese didn't need a BOMB PLOT because they were looking down on the harbor from one mile up. View is kind of unrestricted there.
     
  9. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    ~3,500 messages in the link above. And NONE of them say Pearl Harbor is going to be attacked. And why? Because the Gaimudaijin DIDN'T KNOW ABOUT THE ATTACK, so they could hardly have been chatting about it in a low level diplomatic cypher.
     
  10. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    Yes, I agree they should have done things, like "pickets" and be in a "been at a higher state of readiness".

    I understand kimmel and Short made mistakes. But so did people in
    Washington DC. Those poeple suffered little or no conquense, as a result. That's why over the years, historians have tended to place less blame on Kimmel and Short and more on Washington.
     
  11. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    Red herring there. "historians" such as whom? (And don't bother citing books you haven't read, you don't know what's in them. Quote mining reviews is very easy to spot.)
     
  12. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    Edward Beach & other historians believe that at a secret, late-night White House meeting on the evening before the Pearl Harbor attack, President Roosevelt was informed of the most recently intercepted Japanese communication. A Navy officer who was present later testified that upon reading it, Roosevelt exclaimed "This means war!" Beach contends that it was fear of exposing "Magic" that explains Roosevelt's failure to immediately alert Kimmel, Short and other appropriate officials, and even to deny that this late-night White House meeting ever took place.

    Just one hour and seven minutes before Japanese bombs began falling on Pearl Harbor, an important telegram by General Marshall was dispatched to General Short in Hawaii. It read:
    japanese are presenting at one pm eastern standard time today what amounts to an ultimatum also they are under orders to destroy their code machine immediately stop just what significance the hour set may have we do not know but be on alert accordingly stop inform naval authorities of this communication marshall
    Marshall could have used a trans-Pacific telephone to make sure that Hawaii learned instantly of this momentous news, but this was not done. Instead, this message was sent by regular commercial radio telegraph, and was not received by Short and Kimmel until after the Japanese attack.

    Source: Scapegoats: A Defense of Kimmel and Short at Pearl Harbor, by Edward L. Beach.

    You all don't think Marshall, should have gotten on the horn with Short?
    I do. This may have made a big difference. Ammo lockers all open, planes
    in the air, ships boilers started and maybe even the ships moving.
     
  13. mikebatzel

    mikebatzel Dreadnaught

    Joined:
    Oct 25, 2007
    Messages:
    3,185
    Likes Received:
    406
    Read the link I proved on page one of this thread. If you do, you will see the message is not an ultimatum, or even a severing of diplomatic relations.
     
  14. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    " Beach contends that it was fear of exposing "Magic" that explains Roosevelt's failure to immediately alert Kimmel, Short and other appropriate officials, and even to deny that this late-night White House meeting ever took place."

    The German told the Japanese we were reading Purple. So that dog won't hunt.

    And Kimmel and Short had been alerted. They got the alerts late, but they were sent. We've been over this enough times now.
     
  15. DogFather

    DogFather Member

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2008
    Messages:
    224
    Likes Received:
    5
    Marshall could have used a trans-Pacific telephone to make sure that Hawaii learned instantly of this momentous news

    I still don't have anyones silly excuse will Marshall, just didn't make a phone call.
     
  16. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    The cable was telegraph, not telephone, and privately owned by two companies, the Western Union owned the land connection to San Fran., and the Pacific Transocean Company owned the cable from San Fran. to Hawaii. Since we were NOT at war these cables remained in private hands and the government had to get in line just like any other customer.
     
  17. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    DF, the above was brought up earlier in this thread. Have you not been reading the responses? If you're feeling rushed in replying I suggest you simply slow down and post a reasoned response instead of a hip-shot.
     
  18. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    DF, here is a URL to the Trans Pacific Cable of the Teddy Roosevelt era:

    Goto:

    History of the Atlantic Cable & Submarine Telegraphy - Commercial Pacific Cable Company

    It was still in operation in 1941, but NO telePHONE cables had been laid.
     
  19. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,361
    Likes Received:
    5,712
    As pointed out earlier, the means Washington used for the alert they sent to Hawaii was by the fastest means available. There was an error there, but you'll have to ask Rufus Bratton what happened.

    I don't think we need to do too many more cycles through the same information, do we?
     
  20. syscom3

    syscom3 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2008
    Messages:
    1,240
    Likes Received:
    183
    For the telegraph cables to Hawaii, didn't the US Govt have the right to prioritize messages if it did designate it "urgent" or whatever classification? And someone blundered and sent the messages as a "non priority normal" classification?
     

Share This Page