Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Telegraphist Air Gunner

Discussion in 'Allied Aviation Of WWII' started by Carronade, Dec 18, 2023.

  1. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,337
    Likes Received:
    870
    This was the second crewman in British carrier fighters like the Fulmar. The title seems similar to the radioman/gunner in planes like the SBD, but the rationale usually given is that the extra man was needed for overwater navigation. Was the TAG also a navigator? Were they using a radio navigation device like the American YE/ZB?
     
    Last edited: Dec 19, 2023
  2. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    20,982
    Likes Received:
    3,178
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Carronade likes this.
  3. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,810
    Likes Received:
    5,883
    "A machinist is a tradesperson or trained professional who operates machine tools, and has the ability to set up tools such as milling machines, grinders, lathes, and drilling machines. Machinist. Machinist, operating a metal lathe. Occupation."

    I was a machinist mate (MM), and I never did a job like the one above. I swung .50s on my first permanent duty assignment. I wasn't a gunners mate. Military job titles can be a bit confusing.
     
  4. the_diego

    the_diego Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    404
    Likes Received:
    86
    Must be tough navigating when you're facing in the opposite direction.
     
  5. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,810
    Likes Received:
    5,883
    The headsets allowed the crew to chat. The gunner didn't need to see where they're going, he kept track of headings and speed. Then it's just math.
     
  6. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,189
    Likes Received:
    928
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    In good part, the FAA wanted the second seat in planes to provide for a crewman that could assist the pilot in finding the carrier on a return flight. Whether or not the second seat was a navigator or not, he was certainly intended to have skills commensurate with getting the plane back to the carrier.

    The British system described in the above article was a simple homing beacon. On pg 957 of that article the following under the heading "Security" is given:

    There is generally no special security objection to operating the beacon whenever an aircraft is away from the aircraft carrier, because the presence of the ship is already revealed within effective optical distances by its radar and v.h.f. radio- telephony transmissions, but methods may be adopted to reduce the probability of detection by the enemy.

    YE/ZB was intended from the outset to provide a secure and very difficult to detect homing beacon that would keep the carrier's position hidden from the enemy. It was also largely automatic and could be used by a pilot in a single-seat aircraft. Included in the design were security features to render the signal useless to enemy pilots or receiving stations.

    Unlike the British Type 72 where the radio operator had to align the plane to the signal, with YE/ZB the system would receive a coded signal that when interpreted would tell the pilot what direction the carrier was from his current position without having to carefully align his flight direction to the signal. Thus, the workload using YE/ZB was minimal while using the Type 72 required considerable skill and effort, thus the need for the telegraphist.

    Microsoft PowerPoint - YE-ZB.pptx (ar88.net)

    In fact, once the US entered the war, YE/ZB was shared with the RN and replaced the Type 72 homing beacon in service.
     
    Carronade, ColHessler and GRW like this.

Share This Page