Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Why were the planes used in the two theaters of WWII different?

Discussion in 'Theaters of the Second World War' started by Raftar, Feb 21, 2021.

  1. Raftar

    Raftar New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 21, 2021
    Messages:
    1
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hello everyone,,
    I just watched a TV show about WWII, and it talked about the P-51 in Europe and the Hellcat in the Pacific, and the B-17 https://19216801.onl/ https://routerlogin.uno/ in Europe and the B-29 in the Pacific. What made these and other planes more suited for one theater than the other?
     
    Last edited: Feb 24, 2021
  2. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    RichTO90 likes this.
  3. JJWilson

    JJWilson Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Oct 1, 2017
    Messages:
    1,411
    Likes Received:
    456
    Location:
    Arizona U.S.A
    Hello there!! That is a great question. It was never so much about suitability as it was circumstantial. The Pacific Air war was predominantly Naval and Marine Corps aircraft, with USAAF aircraft in some major parts of the CBI, but not a whole lot in the Pacific. The Hellcat served in Europe as well, but with the Fleet Air Arm in a limited capacity. The P-51 also served in both theaters, but not in the Pacific until the end of the war. The B-29 was perfectly suited for the long range bombing in the Pacific, range that the B-17 didn't have. All were great in their own ways, and they became great because of their circumstances and the pilots who flew them.
     
  4. R Leonard

    R Leonard Member

    Joined:
    Oct 15, 2003
    Messages:
    1,128
    Likes Received:
    780
    Location:
    The Old Dominion
    Damn, what a coincidence.

    Do you suppose someone thought the responses would change?
     
    RichTO90 likes this.
  5. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    1,172
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
  6. the_diego

    the_diego Active Member

    Joined:
    Sep 16, 2016
    Messages:
    400
    Likes Received:
    82
    The free market system, in particular the Government contract bidding system.
     
  7. Dennis Alexander Kalnoky

    Dennis Alexander Kalnoky Member

    Joined:
    Feb 2, 2022
    Messages:
    42
    Likes Received:
    21
    Location:
    Salem, Oregon
    This is an oversimplification, but: In Europe service ceiling was more important as combat took place at higher altitudes. In the Pacific it was about range.

    A good example is the P-38 Lightning. The P-38 suffered from poor cockpit heat and mechanical/freezing problems at altitude. The early P-38s also had an aerodynamic structural problem known as compressibility. P-38 pilots could not follow the Germans in dives because of this problem. In the Pacific however, the P-38 went on to great success. The P-38's range famously allowed it to intercept Admiral Yamamoto, and escort B-24s on long missions well before the P-51 arrived.

    The US Navy did use GM Wildcats in the Atlantic. I'm not sure about Hellcats. Although the Fleet Air Arm had a number of Hellcats and Martlets.
     
  8. Carronade

    Carronade Ace

    Joined:
    Feb 17, 2010
    Messages:
    3,281
    Likes Received:
    846
    The only USN use of Hellcats in the European theater was on two escort carriers supporting the Dragoon landings in southern France. These were one Bogue and one Casablanca class ship, as far as I know the only combat use of F6Fs on those classes. The USN usually used F4F/FM-2s on them and reserved F6Fs for the larger Sangamon and Commencement Bay classes. A few CB class ships also used F4Us late in WWII and in Korea.

    The Royal Navy used Wildcat/Martlets, Hellcats and also Corsairs, including on Bogue type CVEs.
     

Share This Page