Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

UK marine spitfire V us p51 mustang

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by krieg, Mar 5, 2008.

  1. Klive

    Klive Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2007
    Messages:
    24
    Likes Received:
    6
    This is an "apples & oranges" comparison. The Brits have always designed superb interceptors: defending a small island nation, the Hurricane & Spitfire did the same job as the English Electric Lightning years later. But when trying to sell these designs overseas, their range limitations were a severe handicap. For a long-range, potentially offensive fighter, the Americans had the right idea: forget super-fast scrambles - just concentrate on good all-round performance and staying power. That's what you got with the P-47 & P-51. The Spitfire & Mustang were used in totally different roles.

    Klive
     
  2. Prospero Quevedo

    Prospero Quevedo Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 26, 2021
    Messages:
    543
    Likes Received:
    99
    In some documentary on the battle of Britain that was fortunate enough to be made while many air vets were still alive. Most spitfire pilots started in the hurricane but even they said the 109s were a problem, a good pilot could shake them off but they were hard to make a fight with most talked about just trying to break away. But when they got to spits they said but was something different, faster more maneuverable. I'm surprised they took so long to get the bubble type out, the Malcolm canopy was already so close. I really like the 51s with the Malcolm canopy gives them a interesting look. The fact that hawker kept trying to improve the hurricane but gave up and developed an all new airframe shows the basic airframe had reached it peak and could go no farther. Just look at all the marks of spitfires and years of service after the war. Hell during the early Arab Israeli wars both sides loved them, the Israeli's first spits were from salvaged wrecks. They were elated to get a bunch of spitfires from Czechoslovakia, for free, many joked that it was an apology for the a via s-199. Read some of the problems the Israeli's had, the mechanical problems were not too bad except for the interrupter mechanism. Pilots got in the habit of test firing the guns to make sure it was working or shoot the propeller offvsnd have to glide in to a landing. I heard part of the reason they gave them the planes the Soviets had demand that all satellite countries had to dispose of all western equipment. The Czechs didn't want to destroy them and gave them to Israel, funny just a few years ago one of those planes was found in the back yard of a farm as part of a garden display still looking pretty good not sure what happened after that as most countries have laws on war goods most considered historical artifacts and property of the state. Some guy was visiting relatives and when e was a boy his father during the war made a spot in the attic that had a small space he hid a small case. He looked for the panel found it and the case. They had to report it by law and a museum took the case they let him keep some items but the rest was put in a display showing items from the war years. I think it amazing how much stuff has been found recently that people had to have known about for years those 109s though I never saw any with a four prop before was that something they were working on late in the war. Those panthers and still working. M4a2 Sherman in Russia, more KVs and 34s. Too bad about that b29 in Alaska, that guy put most of his money and time and they got so close.
     
  3. Riter

    Riter Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2020
    Messages:
    556
    Likes Received:
    133
    I never heard of the early Spitfires as interceptors but as fighters.
     
  4. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    7,410
    Likes Received:
    1,740
  5. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    24,749
    Likes Received:
    1,699
    Location:
    Finland
    I thought the RAF cleverly waited that the Bf 109's had a limited time period over England and once they had to leave the RAF attacked the bombers. Of course there were losses but a lot less if the 109's were around.
     

Share This Page