Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Bloody Battles

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by Miller phpbb3, Jan 28, 2007.

  1. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    what was the total figures of deaths during the battle of berlin?
     
  2. Hoosier phpbb3

    Hoosier phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 11, 2005
    Messages:
    904
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Bloomington, Indiana USA
    via TanksinWW2
    me262:
    I've seen documentaries on the Battle for Berlin that put Russian "casualties" at 2 million.
    The battle for Seelowe Hights was just a warm-up to that "Mother" of a battle for Berlin.

    Tim
     
  3. Miller phpbb3

    Miller phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    via TanksinWW2
    why didn't russia see the importance of paratroopers in ww2? they really could've used them to by pass german strong holds? same thing in the battle for okinawa, the us didn't drop the 11th airborne in the shuri line. they would've made the battle much easier, what do you think?
     
  4. me262 phpbb3

    me262 phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2004
    Messages:
    3,627
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Porter,TX
    via TanksinWW2
    so we can conclude that stalin ordered the capture of berlin not matter the cost, :eek: :eek:
    and what about german casualties?
     
  5. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    That would be the Soviet Sixth Army.
     
  6. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    The Soviet Union made the first practical use of the paratroop idea. Soviet experiences with airborne operations in WWII pretty much made them give up on largescale paradrops by 1943. Paratroops were too lightly armed, too immobile and too isolated in terms of supply and reinforcement to be effective. They requried so much logistical effort in preparation and transport that were difficult to use in "spontaneous" operations.
    Okinawa was too congested to use the 11th Airborne, the Japanese probably would have been able to isolate and contain a drop. A better question is why no amphibious end run was made.
    This may be one area where Hitler may actually have been on to something after Crete: "The parachute weapon depends on surprise, and this is no longer possible".
     
  7. Miller phpbb3

    Miller phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 30, 2006
    Messages:
    108
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    California
    via TanksinWW2
    oh, i think people should see the usefullness of paratroopers
     

Share This Page