Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Bombing of Dresden--and for what?

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by C.Evans, Jan 6, 2001.

Tags:
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Erich

    Erich Alte Hase

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    14,439
    Likes Received:
    617
    it was bombed too late as industry has already been depleted and removed, I've said this so many times, it's getting old guys. why it was surely bombed in aide of Herr Stalin and the Soviets was the main line centre of the civilian and military retreating through the eastern Reich, it was a hub and BC and US AF did well plastering the place off the map. yes it would of been bombed anyway even if there had been no military installations and there weren't anyway, they were shells of their former selves, so it really does not matter it was done and that was that period ................. lets move on shall we ?
     
  2. Sloniksp

    Sloniksp Ставка

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,321
    Likes Received:
    460
    Yes perhaps it is best.
     
  3. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    I don't have anything else that can possibly be added to this thread-how about you Gents?
     
  4. Chuikov64th

    Chuikov64th Member

    Joined:
    Oct 19, 2007
    Messages:
    268
    Likes Received:
    26
    All I can say is that I am in agreement with you CE. It was a sad event.
     
  5. uksubs

    uksubs Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    36
    I think teammaico post 293 & FalkeEins are right in what there saying
     
  6. FalkeEins

    FalkeEins Member

    Joined:
    Oct 24, 2006
    Messages:
    527
    Likes Received:
    75

    actually when you realise that this thread has been going for seven years now (if I'm not mistaken) and you read the various contributions then I say that for such a 'sensitive' topic its a pretty impressive 'advert' for this forum and its members..
     
  7. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    It's had it's 'moments' over those seven years.....;)
     
  8. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857

    Thank you Chuikov, not opnly are you a Gentleman, but my favorite WWII Russian General & I appreciate it ;-))
     
  9. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    And I agree with both of you Falke, Martin ;-))
     
  10. tonygraves

    tonygraves recruit

    Joined:
    Jan 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4
    Likes Received:
    0
    As Stephen Ambrose put it, after many inteviews of those involved in Dresden firebombing: No pilot was overjoyed with the raid, but after seeing the German bombings of London, Brussels, Antwerp, Rotterdam, Warsaw, etc, they weren't filled with remorse either. They also made a point that no Jews, Gypsies or Poles were killed during the Dresden bombings, because the good Bergers of Dresden had shipped them all off to Auschwitz.
    Hopefully, it wasnt done to take headlines aways from the US 3rd Army
     
  11. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    Without wishing to 'split hairs', but this wasn't quite true. Over 1,000 Jews had indeed been transported from Dresden, but the remaining 198 ( those who were married to non-Jews ) were ordered to report to the Gestapo for transportation. The order was made public on Tuesday, 13th February and that evening, the raid happened.

    Some of the surviving Jews were killed, but some escaped including the Jewish academic, Victor Klemperer, whose diaries were published in 1998.

    Klemperer called his personal deliverance 'a miracle'.
     
  12. PactOfSteel

    PactOfSteel Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    3
    I don't think its a valid comparison either, Auschwitz and Dresden. Dresden had military significance, it was part of bringing the Third Reich to its knees, although I agree that killing 130,000 civilians is flat out atroucious. There is no justification for that, it was the Allies who started bombing the civilian areas not the Axis, Churchill was the one who gave the order to bomb a German city during the Battle of Britain which enraged Hitler who called for the bombing of London. Of course not that Hitler had any qualms with reigning V-2's down on London, and most likely New York if he had the capability. Now I will say that this is somewhat of a vaild comparison, dropping the A-bombs on Hiroshima and Negasaki and Aushwitz, vaporizing hundreds of thousands of civilians in a blink of an eye, but you could also say we warned the Japanese we had this weapon and the Japanese were no saints when he came to killing civilians either (rape of nanking). You could also say the S.S. only started liquidating in the mass millions too cover up their crimes, when we liberated most of the concentration camps the Jews said that the Germans ran out of ammunition to kill of them all. There's probably no justification for either, but at least with the A-bombs it saved another million American GI's lives.
     
  13. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    huh?:confused:
    Where did you get that number?

    Rotterdam, even if we ignore the errant bombs that hit London on 23 Aug, prior to the Berlin raids.

    No, we could not. The mass killings started much too soon to be considered an attempt to coverup. The killings started well before the eventual outcome became evident to the Third Reich leadership and the remainder of the world. As far as your ammunition assumption, maybe on a local level only in the camps, but not likely as there is the option of burning the buildings down with inhabitants in them, which was done. The vast amount of the poor souls killed for their imagined maligned race died as the result of breathing toxic gases in unplumbed showers and most of them were dead long before they ever could get settled into the huts.
     
  14. PactOfSteel

    PactOfSteel Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Jan 16, 2008
    Messages:
    305
    Likes Received:
    3
    I stand corrected, it wasn't 130,000 I read that number on this thread but since you said it wasn't true I did my own research, it was between 30 and 40,000 but that still doesn't make it any better. I wasn't saying the S.S. weren't exterminating them before they realized the war was going ill, I meant they rushed the project, don't get me wrong I'm not making excuses for it just saying the mass killings were rushed. Going back to the ammunition, yeah I meant at local concentration camps.
     
  15. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    That isn't strictly true. The first large-scale, deliberate bombing of a City was Operation Seebad, launched against Warsaw on 15th September 1939. One can use the usual justifications about Warsaw being a military target, etc but the tactics used were certain to kill civilians and the Germans knew it.

    Various Allied towns in the Low Countries were bombed in 1940, including most notoriously Rotterdam as mentioned above. German propaganda cited Freiburg as a precedent, where 57 German civilians had been killed in a 'terror' bombing attack on 10th May, 1940 - the first such raid on German soil.

    ( It was the Luftwaffe....)
     
  16. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    The Spanish civil war is worth considering when talking 'who started it' regarding bombing towns as well.
    Anyone for Geurnica?

    Douhet's ideas were widespread.
     
  17. Owen

    Owen O

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    770
    Why do people get so worked up over Dresden?
    Just another city that was trashed amongst many in WW2.
    Why does this one create such heated debate?
     
  18. Stefan

    Stefan Cavalry Rupert

    Joined:
    Jul 29, 2001
    Messages:
    5,368
    Likes Received:
    336
    I remember reading that whilst Dresden had not been a military target, because it had not been bombed up until the raid there had been some industry moved to the area as it was seen as a safe zone. This included the manufacture of optics and aircraft engine parts, thus I suppose you can justify it as a target, though not the scale of the raid. There is also the fact that the city was a massive transport hub, through which many soldiers were being moved either to or from the eastern front. Admittedly it was also full of refugees running away from the soviets but that sounds like the start of a new 'who started it' argument.

    Then again, let's remember the most significant tactical purpose of the raid, to show the Soviets the destructive power of the RAF's strategic bombing and hopefully maye scare them a little. I'm sure someone will correct me if I'm wrong but didn't the Soviets actually request that the RAF bomb Dresden because they couldn't?
     
  19. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    The first strategic bombing campaign in history started in 1915 during WW1, when the German air force commenced a bombing campaign against targets in Britain using zeppelins and then 'heavy' bombers
     
  20. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    Dresden had in fact already been bombed twice before the raid in Feb 45, once in Oct 44 by a force of 30 USAAF bombers, and again in Jan 45 by 144 USAAF bombers

    It has also been shown that Dresden was less full of refugees as is often claimed, as it was German policy to move them further west as soon as possible

    Dresden was indeed bombed to help the Soviet forces, and the Allies did bomb it to 'impress' the Soviets, but not in the way you suggest. It was bombed to show them what good allies we were and how we were doing our bit to help them.
    The claim that we hoped to scare them with our destructive power is a piece of Cold War invention
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page