bombings in Belgium

And how do they do that. Do you want those who do not support the terrorist to wear a badge so your hot head troopers do not shoot them along with everyone else who in your perverted mind must obviously do so. Then who classifies these people to ensure they are telling the truth?.

You really do need to give the keyboard a rest and feel some fresh air.

 

"Some distant cousins of mine lived down there for quite a while."
We are talking about crossing the border illegally.
Did your cousins swim across the Rio at night, in order to get to that gated community in Mexico

 

That's their problem .

 

And you are wrong : CLEAR ?

Why should Europe be in trouble without population growth ?

 

The robots are coming...every country will soon want to be down sizing...

 

Its your well thought out solution so where is the plan behind it. Just meaningless words as usual.

 

Nonsense : you asked : how do they do that ?

My answer : ask them .

They have created the problem, they must solve him .

 

Grossly wrong on several points.

The politicians believe this whether true or not. That is my point.

You don't understand ecoomics.

 

Wrong again : the politicians did not believe this, they claimed this ,what's something totally different .

Reality is the following : the left wing parties were going down in Europe,because there were less poor, thus they decided to import more poor,who would vote for them .

It is the old Marxist solution : the population is not voting (no longer voting) for us, thus let's change the population .Economics is only a fallacy,besides : socialists are not interested in the succes of economics .

 

We can parse the words to create an alternate reality, but the simple fact is that all of this is originating in the Arabic world. Even African movements like Boko Haram are under the umbrella of Arab terrorist organizations. It hardly matters whether their fellow travelers in this country are native born, here on tourist visas or immigrants. The orders, the money, the training are coming from Arab organizations. I'm not suggesting that all Arabs are the enemy, but it would be foolish to discount the fact that this rebirth of Radical Islam is centered in the Arab world.

 

Which is an entirely different matter and only marginally related to the line of conversation I was engaged in. Note also that some of the staunches opponents of the terrorist are also Arabs. Indeed one reason we have probably seen so few terrorist incidents in this country is because Arab and indeed Muslim Americans for the most part are very much against them. Then there's the question of whether or not Al Quada for instance should really be considered an Arab organization. Certainly much of it's leadership and funding come from Arab countries but a lot of the personnel don't. To me it's like saying the Nazis were a European organization. True but misleading.

Then there's the original point the immigration is not the big threat especially legal immigration. Furthermore if it is handled correctly immigration of individuals from the Mid East can be a tool to use against the terrorist. Pointing a finger at the Arabs as the source of all terrorist is not only wrong it is probably counter productive.

 

You have no idea of what you are saying let alone any idea of the solution to this problem. You come up with the first thing that enters your head and cannot then explain how you will implement it. You cannot throw perverse, we should hurt everyone who does not independently declare themselves against terrorism statements, about and then say - its their problem, its up to them to sort out. If you have nothing realistic to add keep quiet.

 

Why not do something useful. Check you charts and graphs on negative birthrate and inflation and calculate for us when and where the next atrocity will occur. You apparently have all the information you need and it could save lives.

 

The salient point is "if it is handled correctly" which it definitively is not.

 

Your ISIS defense is not convincing .

 

Probably because it isn't something any reasonable person would consider a defense of ISIS. That pretty much leaves you as the only one considering it such and I don't think any one else here is even making an effort to try and convince you of anything anymore. They know that you reside in your own little fantasy world which has only a passing resemblance of the real world.

 

Are you related to LJad? You both pull things out of nothing.

 

boring,as usual

 

The casualties of the terrorist attacks in Belgium are,proportionally ,higher than those of Pearl Harbour. I don't remember that after PH some one said that one should not overreact and not consider the average Japanese as an enemy .

Although the average German was not working in Auschwitz,he was coresponsible for Auschwitz,because without his support,the nazis could do nothing . And he suffered for this : to defeat the nazis, we had to kill a lot of Germans,and to defeat ISIS, we will have to kill a lot of Muslims, and the longer the Muslims will be loyal to ISIS, the more they will suffer . Those who refuse to accept this, are in fact trying to prevent the defeat of ISIS and are defending ISIS .
QED .

 

???? Really? How do you figure? From a quick calculation the population of Belgium now is about 1/12 that of the US in 1941. If we look at fatalities 12 x 35 = 420 < 2,400. If we look at overall casualties 261*12 =3,132 <3,581. That's the most favorable way I can see to calculate the ratios, then there's the fact that significant number of the casualties in Brussels weren't Belgians. Which rather implies we should be using a somewhat larger population say the EU and USA which renders your comment total garbage. Then there's the question of whether it's relevant at all. Especially when the facts don't support that the average European Muslim supports or even sympathizes with the terrorist.

Hard trying to convince us that your fantasy world is real isn't it. The facts just keep getting in the way, not to mention logic and reason.