Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Favorite/best sub machine gun

Discussion in 'The Guns Galore Section' started by dave phpbb3, Feb 18, 2005.

  1. Kellhound

    Kellhound New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Spain
    via TanksinWW2
    Originally, submachineguns (as the name implies) were designed to be CHEAP and easily built machineguns, that could be carried and fired by one man.
     
  2. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    and primarily for clearing out rooms and trenchs so a short range weapon
     
  3. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2

    i think you're talking about the HK MP7
     
  4. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    I probably am... That was a long time ago.
     
  5. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    to my knowledge its the latest one they've brought out and it chambers a simliar round to the P-90 so its designed to penitrate armour like kevlar
     
  6. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    4.6x30mm

    http://world.guns.ru/smg/smg49-e.htm
     
  7. Che_Guevara

    Che_Guevara New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,109
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Davy Jones's locker
    via TanksinWW2
    My favourite?

    hmm, i would choose the PPsh-41 and/or the MP40
     
  8. patton4

    patton4 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    thompson! :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang:
     
  9. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Please explain why! :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang: :bang:
     
  10. patton4

    patton4 New Member

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2004
    Messages:
    113
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    The sound. I do not like the box clip. The round clip is my favorite and it's history
     
  11. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    the drum magazines were heavy and they also rattled. the box magazine in my opinion was much more efficent and more comfortable to carry
     
  12. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Weren't the drum magazines prone to jamming?

    However, they looked way cool! :cool:

    [​IMG]
     
  13. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2

    i dnt kno but to my knowlege they were never taken into military serivce because of the reasons ive stated previously and that is also why the M1 and M1A1 thompsons couldnt take drums magazine becvause they werent being used. but yeh they do look kl but only on a M1928 with a pistol fore grip
     
  14. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    IIRC some were passed on to Britain early in the war (post-Dunkirk) as an emergancy measure.
     
  15. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    you are probably right, but from I've been told none were issued to the American forces
     
  16. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    I think that's correct. For WW2 anyway, the US military used stick magazines. The stick mag was much better suited for military use as it could be easily reloaded from stripper clips, took up less space, easier/faster to make, etc.

    The drum does look super cool though. The Tommy Gun in the pic above is what most folks think of when you mention sub-machine gun. :cool:
     
  17. AL AMIN

    AL AMIN New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2005
    Messages:
    300
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    some where in the middle east
    via TanksinWW2
    mp5 the non plus ultra :lol:
     
  18. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2

    I beleive they were, also the C-mags (i belive 100rounds 5.56 NATO) are prone to jamming themselves.
     
  19. Kellhound

    Kellhound New Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2004
    Messages:
    401
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Spain
    via TanksinWW2
    Really?
    Never heard it from users i know. But you can never know quality checks of different lots.
     
  20. Che_Guevara

    Che_Guevara New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 28, 2005
    Messages:
    1,109
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Davy Jones's locker
    via TanksinWW2
    MÖP,
    correction I would defenitly take the PPsh-41 and throw the MP40 away.

    Regards,
    Che.
     

Share This Page