Admin in an Aurora group I'm in just made me aware of the International Cloud Atlas. Never had an inkling such a thing existed- International Cloud Atlas (wmo.int)
Storm Cloud Over Texas Image Credit & Copyright: Laura Rowe (Used with permission) Explanation: What makes this storm cloud so colorful? First, the cloud itself is composed of millions of tiny droplets of water and ice. Its bottom is almost completely flat -- but this isn't unusual. Bottom flatness in clouds is generally caused by air temperature dropping as you go up, and that above a specific height, water-saturated air condenses out water droplets. The shape of the cloud middle is caused by a water-droplet-laden column of air being blown upward. Most unusual, though, are the orange and yellow colors. Both colors are caused by the cloud's water drops reflecting sunlight. The orange color in the cloud's middle and bottom sections are reflections of a nearly red sunset. In contrast, the yellow color of the cloud's top results from reflection of light from a not-yet-setting Sun, where some -- but less -- blue light is being scattered away. Appearing to float above the plains in Texas, the featured impressive image of a dynamic cumulonimbus cloud was captured in 2021 while investigating a tornado. Otto? Is that you in the "chase truck"?
Don't know about you guys, but the UK has just experienced auroras four nights on the trot. Sunday and Monday it was actually visible to the naked eye, and was amazing. Last night was too cloudy in my neck of the woods to see anything.
"A few years ago" we went on a little exercise to prove that USN aviation ships could operate north of the Arctic Circle. I went up on the flight deck with it was announced that we had an aurora going. One of my guys asked me what the fuck? I told him it was the lights from Santa's workshop. I was horrified when he bought that explanation. Kept an eye on him until I could ship him off.
Was having great trouble with me camera settings the other night. Don't know if it's the camera or I'm just getting more glaikit in my old age. After hours editing yesterday, I managed to salvage this effort. It's still crap though.
I saw that. Interesting stuff, but pretty unreachable. Scientists find evidence of underground water reservoir on Mars - BBC Newsround
If we could start drilling at the bottom of Valles Marineris... " Valles Marineris, the largest canyon in the solar system, can be as deep as 10 kilometers (6.25 miles) in some regions. The canyon's depth varies across its 4,000 kilometer (2,500 mile) length and 200 kilometer (124 mile) width. Scientists believe that massive landslides may cause parts of the canyon's surface to sink, which contributes to the depth variation."
Does dark matter exist? World's most sensitive detector LUX-ZEPLIN fails to find WIMP particle - ABC News I remember watching an "AI" being asked some big questions - One was does dark matter exist? - The computer replied "NO" - What we think is dark matter is actually other Universes pushing into ours...
I've come to the conclusion that explanations and "theories" are nothing but excuses to buttress the authors perception. Now they have disproved Hawking. I'll wait until someone in Academia prophesize's the Universe is Eternal with no beginning nor end.
So our universe is just a bubble in a cosmic bubble bath — a multiverse. What i like about this analogy is the fact that each bubble pushes into the ones next to it without popping itself or other bubbles... Hexagon bubbles...
Not that I agree or disagree, or even pretend to understand www.quantamagazine.org/mathematicians-prove-hawking-wrong-about-extremal "In 1973, the prominent physicists Stephen Hawking, James Bardeen and Brandon Carter asserted that extremal black holes can’t exist in the real world — that there is simply no plausible way that they can form. Nevertheless, for the past 50 years, extremal black holes have served as useful models in theoretical physics. “They have nice symmetries that make it easier to calculate things,” said Gaurav Khanna (opens a new tab)of the University of Rhode Island, and this allows physicists to test theories about the mysterious relationship between quantum mechanics and gravity. Now two mathematicians have proved Hawking and his colleagues wrong. The new work — contained in a pair of (opens a new tab) recent papers (opens a new tab) by Christoph Kehle (opens a new tab) of the Massachusetts Institute of Technology and Ryan Unger (opens a new tab) of Stanford University and the University of California, Berkeley — demonstrates that there is nothing in our known laws of physics to prevent the formation of an extremal black hole."