Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

GLORY OF DISHONOUR

Discussion in 'Eastern Europe' started by Arhivist_Kharkov, Dec 6, 2018.

  1. Tamino

    Tamino Doc - The Deplorable

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,544
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Untersteiermark
    Give me just three examples.
    Further, let me recommend you to first watch the documentary and then speak.
    If Soviets have prosecuted each and every German soldier who committed crimes at the east, that would have constituted a genocide of almost all German population: half of them should have been hung on the first tree and further quarter of them would have deserved to be executed by firing squad. The rest of them should have been sent to Gulag.
    Russians were compassionate and merciful.
    However, if you've read my posts carefully, my point is: Germans have got exactly what they deserved. Or should I say, they wanted more territories than they needed and they have lost territories they haven't deserved.
    PS: Let me clarify the former paragraph: what is the purpose and benefit of hanging the bastard? Nothing, he simply ceases to exist, injustice remains, there is no resolution in killing the turd. In the end you would have to bury the bastard for free. But if you take away something of the greatest value from perpetrators forever, then justice is done. If you pull them from their roots, from their precious land, from the most precious Lebensraum then justice will be done and will stay there forever.
     
    Last edited: Feb 12, 2019 at 1:53 PM
  2. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,968
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Michigan
    Give me one example of a request that was refused.
    Hyberbole in a discussion such as this doesn't help your argument. Indeed it is a clear indicator of bias.
    Some were some weren't by and large that description is at odds with the behavior of the USSR in WW2.
    Then your point is invalid.
    Part of the problem here is the lack of precision. The Nazi German government clearly wanted more territories. Did they "need" them? In at least some sense of the word they most certainly did. Did they "deserve" them I'm of the opinion that Nazi Germany did not "deserve" to exist. As for "Germans" certainly the citizens of Nazi Germany deserve at least some of the blame but how about the German communities in other lands? Some did some didn't but your blanket statements don't allow for such nuances.
    "Ceasing to exist" is not a penalty? As for the rest of your paragraph it smacks of the old "taint of the blood" laws. There is no justice in punishing the innocent. To suggest so indicates a level of prejudice that is rather alarming. Nazi Germany was destroyed. They lost all their land. They cease to exist. Punishing those of German ancestry for the crimes of the Nazi's just doesn't make sense.
     
  3. Tamino

    Tamino Doc - The Deplorable

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,544
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Untersteiermark
    I don’t think you really understand. What I have said until now in this tread is neither my opinion nor my own view. I am just attempting to summarize consequences of the war on German population that can be seen as deliberate punishment to the German nation.

    Let me be concise: trials took place in Nurnberg, but Germans were sentenced in Postdam. Judge was Churchill:

    “Expulsion is the method which, in so far as we have been able to see, will be the most satisfactory and lasting. There will be no mixture of populations to cause endless trouble. A clean sweep will be made. I am not alarmed by these transferrences.”

    Churchill, in the House of Commons in 1944

    The sentence was harsh indeed:

    »It seems that the elimination of the German population of eastern Europe – at least 15,000,000 people – was planned in accordance with decisions made at Yalta..”

    Senator Homer Capehart in a speech before U.S. Senate, Feb. 5, 1946.
     
  4. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    7,545
    Likes Received:
    1,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    A Republican who is critical of a Democrat and...That's unheard of.
     
  5. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    11,968
    Likes Received:
    1,164
    Location:
    Michigan
    That's possible.
    You certainly presented it as if it was your view. Indeed your wording still implies it is your view.
    No. What would be an acceptable end to the war from the allied view point was deiceded at Potsdam. Proposals for the post war period were considered. Churchill had his ideas as did others.
     
  6. Tamino

    Tamino Doc - The Deplorable

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2011
    Messages:
    2,544
    Likes Received:
    293
    Location:
    Untersteiermark
    Of course there were other proposals but it was exactly his idea to cripple Germany forever by bombing and then by dismembering Germany and amputating large parts of historically German territories. It was him who paid-of Poles with German Soil for providing assistance and pretext for destroying Germany. "Rapes" committed by young Red Army soldiers are joke compared to what Churchill did to Germany. Finally, they're leaving the continent at the end of March 2019 and I hope that's forever.
    And, by the way, wasn't that you who denied the existence of British Empire?
     

Share This Page