What???? Who refuses here to understand? To avoid assertions of impartiality towards Her Majesty's Empire, I will show now something else, but very similar: interwar French Colonial empire (see the map below). Just observe how large was French empire, much larger than Poland and Czechoslovakia combined, both by area and population and, importantly, by the number of subjugated 2nd class subjects. There was substantially larger number of 2nd class citizens in that empire than the number of Jews in the entire Europe. By the way, Jews weren't desirable in France too, severely despised. (I am deliberately avoiding deceiving term antisemitism because there is neither anti-Bantu-ism nor any other anti-... ism). And yet: Jews weren’t treated in favorable manner in France, neither in Poland. Why then Poland and not Algeria, for example? So what was wrong with German desire to expand just a little bit by invading Poland and Czechoslovakia? I am not defending invasion of these countries, but what I do I am pointing towards real, large-scale perpetrators. Tell me now: on what moral ground France was accusing Germans and even declaring the war on Germany? Germany invaded comparably much smaller territories. Should we apply the same standards for all or should we maintain different yardsticks because you have desirable but profoundly wrong conclusions to support. If you prefer lies, you may live in your rosy world if you want, just do that but don’t preach me about what is right and what is wrong. Who doesn't understand? Who refuses to understand because the lies are preferable, compared to reality?