Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Market Garden - Something controversial

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by roscoe, Dec 16, 2013.

  1. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
  2. dbf

    dbf Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jan 13, 2010
    Messages:
    234
    Likes Received:
    80
    Location:
    Wherever the brasso & blanco is
    The infantry unit which was to come up in support was 3rd Battalion Irish Guards, my father's unit. It had started the Normandy campaign with a borrowed rifle company which it handed over in Aug 44 to another infantry unit in GAD - that's 25% of it's fighting strength and it remained under strength despite reinforcements throughout the fighting in NWE, eventually having to suspend one company owing to lack of reinforcements. The week previous to Market Garden they'd taken Joe's Bridge and before that lost good men in close fighting in Belgium. It was my father's company which was at the sharp end with the tanks, for three days starting on 17th.

    Carrington held the rank of Lieutenant, Temporary Captain at the time. His MC recommendation attached, endorsed by not only his own CO but Gwatkin, Adair, Horrocks, Dempsey and Monty.
    View attachment 20059
    That a Lt. is given so much credit for halting the entire GAD/30 Corps advance is more than peculiar. The implication also that he could have positioned himself to be present there in command, in the chosen troop at that precise moment, with advance knowledge that it would be a critical juncture in the operation and thereby have some effect on the success of Market Garden, is laughable.

    Tony Jones, mentioned in an earlier post, was with the sapper Field Squadron attached to the GG armoured battalion. His friend Cantlay was also a sapper officer in the sister squadron attached to the 2nd Armoured Battalion Irish Guards/Irish Guards Battle Group. Cantlay had previously worked with both Grenadier and Coldstream armoured battalions in GAD at various points from Normandy onwards - let us not forget that they had landed in June 1944 and fought their way to Holland. Both he and Jones met Burriss post war and they discussed matters with him... apparently not without some disagreement on details.

    Carrington is mentioned in Cantlay's interview on the IWM site, a full transcript of which can be found with the link below.
    http://ww2talk.com/forums/topic/49835-william-gordon-cantlay-14-field-squadron-re-attached-gad/

    To counter this 'as the crow flies' nonsense and inject a little bit of reality about the last stretch to Arnhem, this from the perspective of an infantryman: my father, whose Section by then (normally 8-10 men) consisted of himself and his No. 2 on the Bren ...

    Another person who was there:
    The thoughts of an Irish Guards Lieutenant, in the Armoured Bn:
    What the GAD could not achieve at the end of 4 days' fighting, neither could a 'fresh' Division.

    [hr]


    The above is for others reading the thread, it might be of interest.

    Roscoe can't or won't explain himself at all. Firstly he places facts side by side about certain personalities and expects everyone to merely accept that they have any relevance to the other. Then he just repeats the same unexplained rejections to any counter, no matter the sources. It's his posts which are hollow: I've seen nothing apart from his stated opinion, and linking to a film scene.

    If indeed the purpose of this thread was to engage, get people round to his way of thinking, he's not done a great job so far. He asks questions, the responses are rejected, but he himself gives no real answers. The text in the original post - are they his own words quoted, or those of someone else, does anyone know?


    Will Roscoe say why he thinks that the 3 points he mentioned ended up with the outcome they did? Why Carrington stopped, Burriss' offer was rejected etc, etc? Despite Urqh's invitation, we haven't heard his explanation/reasoning yet, just the condescending repetition of unconnected 'facts' by a person trying to make out they know something the rest of us don't.
     

    Attached Files:

  3. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    i was sort of hoping you might do that, D.
    :pipesmoke:


    I retract my comment about 'extrapolating anything of worth' being impossible.
    If this has triggered such solid (and apparently slightly annoyed :lol: ) nuggets like the above and some of the other reasonable & backed-up bits of actual history added, then there has at least been a grain of worth.
    To put it bluntly, stuff like that cacks all over conspiracist nonsense. We might actually learn something from it...


    Any more assertions, Roscoe?
    I personally think people have answered all the WW2 angles quite nicely. Though maybe that's just me... and the Lizards... and I'm obviously 'not ready for this'...
     
  4. jimmytwohand

    jimmytwohand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Damn fine post dbf, damn fine. Not only restrained given the circumstances but bloody informative. Stands rereading a good few times, felt moved to comment as a "like this" didn't seem appropriately proportionate to the obvious effort that has gone into it.
     
  5. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    I really didn't need that mental image right now (and by right now I mean any time this millenium).
     
  6. roscoe

    roscoe Guest

    Now LISTEN to the testimony of Moffat Burriss, After the Robert Redford piece.

    Hanzel says there were only picket forces between the Nijmegen bridge and the Arnhem bridge.

    His artilliery map confirms what he says. About 60 troops maximum.

    The Polish paratroopers were at Driel on the south side of the Rhine.

    Something else I wanted to say was.

    How come the Germans could fly air cover but the allies couldn't?

    Can I just say that I'm not the only person who thinks there's something wrong here.

    I haven't broached in detail upon what Hibbert has to say. Hibbert was In charge of the troops holding the northern side of Arnhem bridge. Johnny Frost had been wounded. Hibbert knew that there were routes open to bridge. Hibbert was only a Major and no Brigadier was going to take suggestions from a mere Major even though he was in charge of a key position.

    A Bridge NOT Far

    Historian Richard Holmes
     
  7. jimmytwohand

    jimmytwohand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    That testimony seems to be edited excerpts from a radio show. Can we view the whole transcript anywhere to see what may have been snipped? Who did the snipping? Those reserves aside i cant see how that really supports your position. Ill transcribe the parts i found interesting seeing as you didnt bother. Please do the same as i'm obviously missing what you hear.

    From Moffatt Burriss youtube video:


    Is that an indictment on Carrington or Horrocks?


    He goes on to note the difference in fighting styles (airborne much more aggressive). He also seems to be talking about saving the troops, not taking the bridge/ furthering the objectives of the operation.


    He doesnt say why he doesnt find that convincing. I have to say, i do. Those all sound like plausible problems. You said earlier that you did too. What has changed your mind?


    He then talks about threatening to shoot Carrington etc....


    You seem to know differently Roscoe, please provide your evidence to support your concrete statements of FACT.


    Ive tried to find references to this map you mention as i do not have Kershaw's book. Can't find this Hassel/Hanzel character though.Did Hassel/Hanzel give this map to Carrington at the time?Im assumming he did otherwise how the heck is a German map published in a book in 2010 (ref amazon, the cover seems to be the same as the one you posted) supposed to help?

    Not sure about the air cover tbh. It is not unknown for weather conditions to be different in different places though, say between different airfields? Is this an honest question or are you expecting a conclusion to be drawn from this?
     
    dbf and belasar like this.
  8. roscoe

    roscoe Guest

  9. jimmytwohand

    jimmytwohand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Like has already been mentioned, if you want to discuss that stuff open a thread in the stump. You will have takers. Unless you are arguing that Carrington had access to time travel i fail to see the relevance. Did you read the part where it says the infomation is unofficial and may contain inaccuracies?
     
    dbf and George Patton like this.
  10. Owen

    Owen O

    Joined:
    May 14, 2006
    Messages:
    2,782
    Likes Received:
    770
    Ah now we know why the Anzio landings got bogged now, Denis Healey was there .
    Therefore that was another Bilderberg plot.

    why am I wasting my time on this thread, cos I'm feeling a bit narked & need some light relief.
    hohoho Merry Christmas.
     
  11. O.M.A.

    O.M.A. Active Member

    Joined:
    Mar 20, 2013
    Messages:
    473
    Likes Received:
    80
    Location:
    Illinois
    Hi roscoe, nice thread, enjoying it muchly with popcorn.

    You signature says you are a war artist, I like war art, do you have anything to share with us?
     
  12. jimmytwohand

    jimmytwohand New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 9, 2013
    Messages:
    105
    Likes Received:
    24
    Location:
    Birmingham, England
    Might be best in a different thread mate, think we are cramming enough into this one as it is. :D
     
  13. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    I like the randomness. it tastes like peaches.

    Can't get trashed on every original assertion, Roscoe, and then just move onto 'Market Garden in general', as you seem to want to.
    We know it's an op. with controversies, controversies which have been done to death on far better grounds than yours.

    On the other guff; lets play the conspiracist connections game.
    It's a very easy game after all.
    1. Take a near random group of personalities, particularly those with power of some sort, or an esoteric or privileged/inherited background.
    2. Establish a LINK between them, no matter how tenuous.
    3. Blow that tenuous link out of all proportion, throwing in a healthy dose of faux gravitas & claims to HIDDEN KNOWLEDGE.
    4. Defend the theory against all criticism using a well-established rule that anyone who queries THE CONSPIRACY is obviously a part of THE CONSPIRACY, or an ill-informed STOOGE thereof.
    5. Keep it just confusing enough.
    6. Use lots of random Capitalisation. Got to have the CAPITALS. It makes things look heart-felt, as any fule kno.
      6a: mention MK ULTRA, just for good measure.
    Hitler was an AUSTRIAN.
    Prince Philip was a GREEK (sort of).
    The GREEKS allied with the SERBS in 1913.
    Prince Philip attended Bilderberg.
    SERBIA had a bit of bother with ETHNIC CLEANSING.
    Greece & the UK are NATO countries.

    QED: Philip used his Greek & Bilderberg connections to carry out a borderline recreation of Adolf's (senior Lizard) plans at Omarska etc. in the 90s.
    After this plan was enabled, Austria was finally allowed to attend Bilderberg in the 00s. IMAGINE THAT!
    The real power here is GREECE, who have a secret agenda of BALKAN unification under the Greek Orthodox Church. Their recent financial troubles are merely a plot by the many EU functionaries who have attended Bilderberg to destabilise the region further and precipitate a new war in the area, so that Prince Philip, with the support of NATO, and with his new Austrian/Hitlerian line of information can become Balkan Emperor (obviously a handy central-european jumping-off point for when his Wife and her Lizard masters initiate the final plan for overt domination).
    See MK ULTRA for assorted vague and handily hard-to-substantiate references.

    The really unnerving thing isn't that such arse like the above really does get concocted in the first place, it's that people run with it.
    The Internet has been the single biggest boon to conspiratorial arse-gravy since Crowley bought Thelema.

    Obviously, I'm only an amateur at the game. Check out this piece of advanced mentalism from a true master which a mate sent the other day. It has everything; incredible misconceptions, blatant lacks of simple knowledge, faux gravitas & that essential aspect of 'so f-ing what?' for any passing browser:
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cX_9sOEenFs

    And as for your Bilderberg attendance list.
    Yes, we know, I've been using the Wiki listing since first joining the thread. Who knew Wiki was such a hard to access repository of secret knowledge.
    Oh... hang on...



    Now tell us more about David Irving, and why you apparently think he's great?
    Any slight issues with his output, or is it all sound as a pound?
     
  14. ptimms

    ptimms Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    98
    Roscoe,


    For the record do you believe that Carrington stopped because of some conspiracy, most of your posts hint at it but you never actually say it. When challenged you either call him a coward or come up with spurious proof like the SS maps at the time show there were no troops between him and the bridge at Arnhem (maps which I'm led to believe the SS weren't showing him unless you prove different).


    So straight answer to a straight question please.
     
    roscoe likes this.
  15. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    Nice,but I have seen better from Webster Tarpley. :insane:
     
  16. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    I of course am a member of the Bilderberg group. Was invited by my step father Dennis Healey. My brother though was blackballed...Dennis got me in at the time of the Royal Navy carrier debate. He wanted reasons from the Navy board to give them the carriers that they wanted. It was not difficult. But the Sea lords cocked up and ended up with through deck cruisers. Not too bad but not first choice. The reason this happened was because I was infiltrated to the Sea lords smoking room in Whitehall as a steward...a first class steward I was too....I even earned the title barsteward from one scource...and very saucy that sailor was too...But no, but yes, but no I digress...I was given the secret handshake....and initiated via Jimmy Parrot Face Davies....I'm sick sick sick up to here fame....And nearly caught bird flu. Anyway back to the story...Builderburk And John Majors dad..a right royal clown...got me in the room...We were of the opinion the Navy was far too gung ho on keeping Commonwealth ties, and of course we wanted world wide administrative powers. Think on too...my sister was also the cause of the TSR 2 fiasco....she was a biggerburk sex temptress...We sorted out those RAF types too...Wanted to keep out in Empire bases and keep the old aircraft out of the rain..wanted them labled strategic and hidden away for private use...Which is why the Bilderburg phantom sold well later thru the world arms sales...my sis slept with Air commodore...pegasus Vilheim the fourth of the Dutch air force liason mission. Missionary acomplished there then.
    The last jig in the saw was my nephew Alan...He was another bastard son of Dennis...sorry, stepson..The army of course wanted to stay in Germany for ever....The Dutch royal family being inherent Nazi's...sorry world wide administration councilors...He managed to infiltrate the Berlin Signals establishment...General...4 star...Caruthers of the Guards being second in command BAOR and assistan Nato secretary was compomised with Alan...and a Salmon sandwich at A Shell New years eve party in Potsdam. Hence no tanks, no Baor, and a worldwide police force under the glourious Duke Of Edinboro....Bloody Marvellous.
     
  17. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    I just Googled him.
    Really wish I hadn't.

    That, Sir, is playing the game.
    Including TSR2 a master-stroke among a military history audience.
    Well played.

    I expect to see something similar on Icke very soon.
     
  18. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Argh!
    Coincidence?
    Or something more... sinister?
    Numerology & the kabbalah may come into play.
     
  19. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    You ain't see nothing yet :Roscoe is only an amateur :wait till the grandmaster of the conspirationalists will honour us with his visite ,the man who is speaking about the Historian Webster Tarpley .. For the moment,he is haunting on the Armchair General site..
     
  20. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    Associated with Lyndon LaRouche...all I needed to see.

    Y'all please alert me if that...person...shows up here.
     

Share This Page