Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

More ugly airplanes

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by TA152, Mar 23, 2006.

  1. ScreamingEagleMG42

    ScreamingEagleMG42 Member

    Joined:
    May 16, 2006
    Messages:
    123
    Likes Received:
    5
    only the french could build something so ugly.
     
  2. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,133
    Likes Received:
    898
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    And let's not forget Jack Northrop's XP-56 "flying egg." Or, was it frying egg as it was really a bad flyer....

    XP 56
     
  3. TA152

    TA152 Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    120
    It kind of looks like a Me-163 with landing gear in that picture, but I know the XP-56 was a much larger aircraft.
     
  4. Hawkerace

    Hawkerace Member

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2006
    Messages:
    844
    Likes Received:
    28
    man thats whacked.
     
  5. Grudgie

    Grudgie Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2006
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    I say the original planes are beautifull.
     
  6. Fortune

    Fortune Member

    Joined:
    Nov 22, 2005
    Messages:
    634
    Likes Received:
    0
    pretty funky, but you have to be innovative...
     
  7. TA152

    TA152 Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    120
  8. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,300
    Likes Received:
    1,919
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Excellent Thing!
    Looks like an Me262 has mated with an Anson, and then the Baby got fat.
    Cheers,
    Adam
     
  9. Richard

    Richard Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    333
    What the heck is that! :eek:
     
  10. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,133
    Likes Received:
    898
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    It's a flying Citron!
     
  11. Richard

    Richard Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 15, 2006
    Messages:
    5,847
    Likes Received:
    333
    Nice touch T.A. [​IMG]
     
  12. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,133
    Likes Received:
    898
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    And, its even uglier and werider "cousin"

    Arsenal-Delanne 10

    By-the-by, the Sud Est 100 really was going to be built by Citroën in Paris! I didn't know that when I jokingly posted earlier. Truth is stranger than BS!
     
  13. TA152

    TA152 Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    120
    One good attribute of the plane is that it would be easy for the crew to bail out of. I know that is what I would do if I saw a German fighter on the way !
     
  14. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    If this isn't ugly, then I don't know what is :)


    I[FONT=新細明體]n 1942, USAAF requested for a new heavy armored ground attack airplane as planned to replace the Douglas A-20 Havoc. Beech Aircraft Corp had already started work on the design of the Model 28 “Destroyer" which the specification did met to the requirement. So a contract was awarded to Beech for two prototypes that designated XA-38 and re-named "Grizzly" with competition[FONT=新細明體] in Hughes XA-37 (later it changed to XF-11). For ground attack purpose, the aircraft wore a cannon and two guns in the nose, as well as with two remote-controlled turrets[/FONT]o[FONT=新細明體]n the fuselage. Two powerful Wright engines as [/FONT]served same in the B-29 bomber were chosen to drive this heavy machine. First flight was made in 1944. The aircraft proved satisfactory and better than expected. However, due to the lack of engines at war, B-29 had top priority to use the engines inventory. It led to the A-38 never served in quantity. After the second prototype tested in September 1945, the USAAF lost interest in the attack bomber. The XA-38 project was cancelled[/FONT].

    [​IMG] [​IMG]


    Type: Ground attack bomber interceptor
    Purpose: Designed for tactical military service as an attack bomber
    Span: 67ft.4in.
    Length: 51ft.9in.
    Height: 15ft.6in.
    Engine: 2x Wright GR-3350-43 radial engine
    Max.speed: 376 mph
    Crew: 2
    Armament: 1x T15E1 75 mm cannon + 6x 0.50 Calbre (12.7 mm) machine guns
     
  15. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Where's the bucket?


    In 1943, the Douglas began a company funded study to a high speed bomber design which was not liked the traditional wing mounting engines. It was an unusual idea to install the two engines within the fuselage, driving a pair of propellers mounted at the tail. That can leaving the wing and fuselage clean and free of aerodynamics-reducing protrusions. Douglas submitted an unsolicited proposal to USAAF, and was awarded a contract for two prototypes. The first prototype first flew in May 1944. Performance was excellent as described in the original proposal. The second prototype joined the flight test program in August, 1944, and was destroyed in crash in December 1945. By the end of war and the jet-powered bomber soon be forthcoming, the Army Air Force had decided that the XB-42 would not be put into the production. The surviving XB-42 was continued for tests and modification until 1948.

    [​IMG]
    [​IMG]


    Type:
    Purpose:
    Span:
    Length:
    Height:
    Engine:
    Max.speed:
    Crew:
    Armament:
    Experimental light bomber

    To explore new design for high-speed bomber
    70ft.6in.
    53ft.8in.
    18ft.10in.
    2x Allison V-1710-125
    410 mph
    3
    4x 0.5 inch machine gun / 8000 pounds bomb load


    The thing even has two cockpits side by side !!!

     
  16. TA152

    TA152 Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 17, 2002
    Messages:
    3,423
    Likes Received:
    120
    What is so ugly about the XA-38 ? Looks OK to me. It would help to paint the nose in black and yellow circles like a bee.
     
  17. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
    Da nose! Da nose! And people called the F-111 the Aarvark!

    Speaking of knowses, what about the B-18 Bolo?
    [​IMG]
     

Share This Page