leadership is bound in the individual "virtue " of the man in charge , it's the nazi fuhrer principle , the personnal example of dynamic transformation of a group of individuals into one body , one purpose . there will always be such men , but an army is an averaging system . dedicated to producing reliable results by tried and true means . it is a constant than ina country at peace the commanders are chosen for their organisational and political talents , after all those are important skills to maintain the armed force in some shape against the constant pressure of budget cuts . when war happen , it is a healthy commander who assume than his command is in need of a serious shakeout . including himself
MY DAD. On April 14th. on this thread I posted an expression that was not understood by 'Woody' or 'Roel', it was 'My Dad can beat your Dad', I later tried to explain it but a cartoon in todays Daily Telegraph will probably do it better. It is by top cartoonist 'MATT' and refers to the news that a 63 year old woman is expecting a baby by IVF treatment.
I respectfully disagree that the debate had descended to the level of play-ground insults. I was arguing the case that rating fighter pilots on their confirmed kill tally alone was flawed in a number of respects, Majorwoody was arguing against that. Woody was trying to draw other parallels, I tried to demonstrate that such parallels were equally flawed. Both views are valid (Although I was right of course ), but I don't see that it got down to the level of the playground, and it's certainly no different to the other "-piece of equipment/troop type- X is better than piece of equipment/troop type Y" discussions that inevitably crop up.
I was going to mention him, but I think the fact that Rudel was an Airman rather than a soldier is important in that statement.
greg...the us military does have lots of "i was there " medals....(my dad had a bunch of them).....it does not detract from the silver stars ,purple hearts or moh....but i can see merlins point...
There is nothing wrong with campaign ribbons which is what "I was there" medals are or other ribbons or medals awarded for other non-combat related service or achievement. There is a difference between campaign ribbons and personal decorations. BTW how do you know how the ribbons worn by US servicemen compares to those of other nations?
I think that the issue of American decorations only really became anything more than a sarcastic remark or two when American servicemen started appearing over here with chests full of ribbons, compared to the average Brit soldier who would be particularly brave/daring to get just one. Just another advantage them darn Yankees enjoyed over the British lads when competing for the attentions of the British ladies.