Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Most Stupid Weapon of WWII

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by Doktor D 1313, Jan 11, 2007.

  1. Hufflepuff

    Hufflepuff Semi-Frightening Mountain Goat

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Sewanee, Tennessee, USA
    yup. the big difference is the Germans actually BUILT the gustav. but the landkreuzer would have been a total disaster...
     
  2. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Yes they did built that white elephant, and the Vortex Gun, the Sound Cannon, and the Wind Cannon too. Pretty weird, but the Japanese were working on a "death ray" using microwaves too, apparently hoping to "fry" the invaders as they stepped onto Japanese soil. That didn't work either.
     
  3. froek

    froek Member

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    69
    Likes Received:
    0
    Actually the wind cannon worked...
     
  4. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    And here it is...


    Dr. Zippermeyer, an eccentric Austrian inventor working at an experimental establishment at Lofer in the Tyrol, designed and built a series of highly unorthodox anti-aircraft weapons that were observed very closely by the Reichsluftfahrtamt (Office of Aeronautics) in Berlin. Due to the overwhelming numerical air superiority of the Allies every effort was made during the last year of the war to find ways of exploiting any known phenomenon that could bring down the heavy bombers of the USAAF and RAF.


    Dr. Zippermeyer constructed both a huge Wirbelwind Kanone (Whirlwind Cannon) and Turbulenz Kanone (Vortex Cannon). Both had the same goal - to knock down enemy bombers through clever manipulation of air.
    [​IMG]

    Zippermeyer Wirbelwind Kanone

    To achieve this, the “Wind Cannon” used a detonation of hydrogen and oxygen to form a highly compressed plug of air that was channeled through a long tube that was bent at an angle and fired like a shell towards enemy aircraft. Impossible as this may seem theWind Cannon did particularly well on the ground - breaking one inch thick wooden boards from a range of 200 yards! This promising development, however, meant nothing against the Allied bombers that were flying at 20,000 ft! Nevertheless, taken from the Hillersleben Proving Grounds the Wind Cannon was used in defense of a bridge over the Elbe River in 1945. Either there were no aircraft present or the cannon had no effect because it was still intact where it was found.

    Faulker Feuersturm
     
  5. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Functioning (working) is hardly the same as meeting expectations and having any effect on the war's outcome. In that I would put the "Wind Cannon" into the stupid realm as per wasted funds, material, and manpower.
     
  6. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    "Either there were no aircraft present or the cannon had no effect because it was still intact where it was found."
    You're right, Clint. This last sentence is the key to making it "stupid".
     
  7. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    See this post put you over the two grand mark Lou! Congrats.
     
  8. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Thanks. Now I get to start on a whole new row of medals. 996 to go.:eek:
     
  9. Hufflepuff

    Hufflepuff Semi-Frightening Mountain Goat

    Joined:
    Feb 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,362
    Likes Received:
    79
    Location:
    Sewanee, Tennessee, USA
    The "sound gun" someone mentioned earlier actually made scientific sense, but the problem was obviously the fact that not only the enemy gets deafened :D so that is a pretty good candidtate for a stupid weapon
     
  10. f6fhellcat

    f6fhellcat Member

    Joined:
    Sep 17, 2009
    Messages:
    290
    Likes Received:
    17
  11. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,197
    Likes Received:
    932
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    Here's a great one. This was actually seriously considered too!

    The Allies shortly after London became a V-1 target started looking at ways they might stop the attacks. One proposed method was to jam the magnetic compass of the V-1 causing it to veer off course.

    The proposal was made by Dr. Don Hare of the Airborne Insturments Laboratory (AIL) to use about 60 miles or railway around London to form a gigantic magnetic loop that would disrupt the V-1's compass. His team worked out that with some modifications to existing rail systems they could pass a 1000 amp DC current through the rails that would be sufficent to deflect the compass at up to alititudes of about 2000 feet. The power required was about 20 to 30 Megawatts.

    The proximity fuze saved the day proving effective enough that AA fire was sufficently deadly to V-1's that this proposal was dropped before it was actually built.
     
    Tomcat likes this.
  12. Sloniksp

    Sloniksp Ставка

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,321
    Likes Received:
    460
    Stumbled upon an interesting article on Soviet Dogs being used in WW2....


    According to Soviet sources, the anti-tank dogs were successful at disabling a reported three hundred German tanks. They were enough of a problem to the Nazi advance that the Germans were compelled to take measures against them.

    Military Technology / Videos | Anti tank attack dogs used in WW2 | Military technology and military videos

    From the article they dont seem as useless as some have claimed....
    Can anyone verify?
     
  13. Tomcat

    Tomcat The One From Down Under

    Joined:
    Feb 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,048
    Likes Received:
    267
    I have never seen anything like this before about the dogs. Everything I have seen relates to them not lasting in service due to them not being able to distinguish the German tanks from the Russian ones.

    There appears to be no reference to it, so I doubt it is real. Also if they started mounting flamethrowers this would cause the need for every tank to be fitted with them and I think this is just a little far fetched.
     
  14. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Well a claim of 300 tanks killed doesn't mean that 300 were actually killed and if there were several hundred Soviet tanks killed as well ....
    I'd heard that the Germans just took to shooting stray dogs. Although this may have been as much to supplement thier diet as to take care of bomb dogs.
     
  15. USMC

    USMC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    10
  16. Devilsadvocate

    Devilsadvocate Ace

    Joined:
    May 6, 2008
    Messages:
    2,194
    Likes Received:
    346
    Yeah, I'll just bet the rotors didn't cause any torque problems! Maybe the Germans found a way to get around the laws of physics?

    Can you imagine trying to land one of these things on it's tail? The pilot would be flying blind for the last hundred or so feet of altitude. That's what killed the postwar American VTOL projects, the extreme danger in landing them.
     
  17. mac_bolan00

    mac_bolan00 Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2008
    Messages:
    717
    Likes Received:
    20
    nothing that a well-designed smaller knife (like those in the present inventory) can't do.
    [​IMG]
     
  18. USMC

    USMC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    10
    The Luftwaffe started to get a wee bit irrational towards the bitter end.
     
  19. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,197
    Likes Received:
    932
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    Back on page 1 I mentioned these:

    The Me 163 Komet had about a 1 to 10 kill to loss ratio. Not good. I think Komets shot down 2 bombers total if I recall correctly while losses to crashes, being shot down after running out of fuel, and just exploding for various reasons did in quite a few of them.

    The "Sticky bomb" or officially the "Grenade No. 74" and unofficially called alot of other things that are unprintable... At least the British Army never actually approved it for use. That honor went to MD1 Britain's equivalent of the OSS. They manufactured these and then handed them out to the French resistance. The British must have really hated the French.....

    The Nambu pistol and Chauchat machine gun have been discussed at length.

    The UP projector. This fired a 3" rocket in a salvo. A wire unspooled from the rocket to hopefully entangle the target aircraft. I think explosives at the pointy end would have been a better bet....

    The German Niger human torpedo. Obstensively not a suicide weapon but.... It did suffer a 100% casuality rate among the users and it never managed to torpedo a ship.
     
  20. USMC

    USMC Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2009
    Messages:
    464
    Likes Received:
    10
    Don't forget the Japanese Baka rocket bomb. lol
     

Share This Page