Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

mp-44?

Discussion in 'The Guns Galore Section' started by Spearhead phpbb3, Jul 28, 2004.

  1. Jens Knudsen

    Jens Knudsen New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
  2. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    There can be no doubt that Kalashnikov examined the StG.44 - the Russians had thousands of them. And the development of the 7.62x39 cartridge which was used in the AK-47 (as well as the SKS and various other earlier designs) occurred following capture of an early MKb.42 and its 7.92x33 ammo.

    It seems likely that Kalashnikov was influenced by the StG.44 in terms of its general configuration. But the AK-47 was very different in its operating mechanism, and was certainly not a copy.

    Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and Discussion forum
     
  3. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    Kalashnikov didn't examine the M.P. 44 until after the AK-47 was designed. He was withdrawn from the front before the M.P. 44 was introduced. Even though the Russians would have captured relatively large amounts, it doesn't mean that they would show it around to everybody.

    Christian
     
  4. Jens Knudsen

    Jens Knudsen New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
  5. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    The same article also mentions that he had designed two submachine guns prior to being re-assigned.

    I don't see why Kalashnikov just have to have looked at the M.P. 44 when designing the AK-47 (which wasn't designed in 1947, but much earlier, as mentioned in the article). They are different in both function and appearence. The AK-47 is much better comparable to the PPSh-41.

    Christian
     
  6. Jens Knudsen

    Jens Knudsen New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2004
    Messages:
    331
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    never sayed that he only looked at the MP43/MP44/Stg44, but he tested it....
    and the Ak47 is the 1947 model of the weapon, before that there was a model called Ak46, from 1946
    Yes he made the submachine before that...........
    and it is not mentioned anywhere that the Ak47 is a copy of the stg44.
    he tested the MP43/MP44/stg44 and he might got some ideas for the Ak47
     
  7. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    I just don't know which ideas he would have gotten, though...
     
  8. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    If you're designing a new weapon it's bound to be useful to try out an existing one in the same class. You note the good and bad points of it, and try to match the former and resolve the latter. It gives you a yardstick to judge your own work by. That doesn't mean that you copy any specific feature of the existing gun.

    Tony Williams
     
  9. Mutant Poodle

    Mutant Poodle New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 20, 2003
    Messages:
    1,480
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Jupiter's Fourth Moon.
    via TanksinWW2
    The MP40 was a machine pistol, was it not?
     

Share This Page