Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Mussolini / Italy stayed neutral?

Discussion in 'What If - Other' started by Black Cat, Dec 1, 2003.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Vermillion

    Vermillion Member

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2003
    Messages:
    114
    Likes Received:
    0
    I think the point is, however, while Italy's fighters may have been able to compete with British antiquated Gladiators over Malta, Italy's involvement in the war was not limited to malta, and they could certainly not compete with even obsolescant British fighters like the Hurricane.

    I think when we are speaking of a nation's ability to 'compete with malta' a rock the size of a small city, we get an idea of just how ill-prepared they were for a wider war.
     
  2. Friedrich

    Friedrich Expert

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2002
    Messages:
    6,548
    Likes Received:
    52
    I think we all agree here that despite a few exceptions, Italy was ill-prepared for war and even with a rearmament in depth - which would have taken ages and was not even possible with such a poor industrial base- Italy just couldn't have made any significance contribution to either side in WWII.
     
  3. DUCE

    DUCE Member

    Joined:
    Jan 31, 2003
    Messages:
    468
    Likes Received:
    0
    Mussolini said alot of stupid things like that. Makes me wonder if he was "all there" at times.
    When the pact of Steel was signed, it pretty much allowed Germany to walk all over Italy. I think it would have been much wiser for the ol' DUCE to simply stay out of it. Then again, his plans on a "New Roman Empire" sure wouldn't have gotten very far with that mentality.
    ....wait a minute, it didn't get very far anyways... [​IMG] ;) [​IMG]

    Ciao,
    DUCE
     
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Share This Page