Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Oh nothing really just wanted to share

Discussion in 'Free Fire Zone' started by Biak, Jan 23, 2013.

  1. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,092
    Likes Received:
    3,393
    Well he and i should get along famously then : )
    My IQ would make you faint...Not that i put much store in those dodgy tests.
    Theres more than a couple of very smart dudes on this forum too...
     
  2. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    I struggle by with my 123. :explosion2:
     
    CAC likes this.
  3. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,092
    Likes Received:
    3,393
    'Tied up in the Moira Forest, near Mathoura NSW. ( 1976). This houseboat
    still had the Consolidated plate which identified it as A24-88 (RK-A), which had been a 42 Squadron 'Black Cat'. It took part in the secret long range mission to drop mines in Manila harbour, in December 1944.' Photo by Nigel Daw

    upload_2022-12-8_14-33-48.jpeg
     
    OpanaPointer likes this.
  4. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    Cajun Air Force?
     
    A-58 likes this.
  5. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,092
    Likes Received:
    3,393
    Except it’s New South Wales…

    Something I’ve not seen before…

    Japanese model of Pearl Harbor, showing ships located as they were during the 7 December 1941 attack. This model was constructed after the attack for use in making a motion picture. The original photograph was brought back to the U.S. from Japan at the end of World War II by Rear Admiral John Shafroth.

    upload_2022-12-8_21-52-8.jpeg
     
  6. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    I showed that to the WWII class at Purdue when I was a grad student.

    "The Japanese originally planned to use a couple of really large dudes instead of risking their carriers." ;)
     
    CAC likes this.
  7. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    I like the dude in the " bowler" hat !
     
  8. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    Bowler Derby. (I had that pix projected on a movie screen for Purdue's WWI class one year.)

    "The carrier attack was actually the second plan. The first one called for some really big dudes, kaiju level, to kick the crap out of the US Fleet." :insane:
     
  9. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Then why didn't they send Godzilla ??
     
    A-58 likes this.
  10. USMCPrice

    USMCPrice Idiot at Large

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    5,168
    Likes Received:
    2,140
    Location:
    God's Country
    Because Godzilla is the product of an Atomic Bomb, and the US didn't use it until 1945. So, Godzilla would have had to travel back in time to participate at Pearl Harbor, doing so would likely have resulted in Japanese victory and no atomic bombing, which woke and empowered Godzilla. No bombings, no Godzilla to time travel, temporal paradox.
     
    A-58 and Biak like this.
  11. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Okay but I always thought they used the A-bomb as an excuse to cover up the fact Godzilla escaped his cage ?
     
  12. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    Licensing issues, of course. They would had to send Gene Barry as well and nobody wanted that.
     
  13. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,028
    Likes Received:
    3,211
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    I somehow managed to miss this post first time round.
    Yeah, it's bloody massive up close! The guys I volunteer for do narrowboat hires, which include letting you steer through the wheel. Or up and over, would be a better description. Haven't been on it myself yet.
    All Aboard the Falkirk Wheel, in central Scotland
    The Falkirk Wheel | Scottish Canals
     
    Biak likes this.
  14. A-58

    A-58 Cool Dude

    Joined:
    Nov 13, 2008
    Messages:
    9,033
    Likes Received:
    1,823
    Location:
    Baton Rouge, Louisiana

    I think he’s referred to as “God-zirrah” over there.
     
    Biak likes this.
  15. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    Gojira!!!!!
     
    A-58 likes this.
  16. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Ah So san. They just don't make movies like they use to. Miss seeing the wires !
     
    A-58 likes this.
  17. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    For those that are interested:

    upload_2022-12-9_15-22-28.png

    With the unveiling of the B-21 Raider, speculation and interest in the new bomber have reached a fever pitch, with a first flight still to come in mid-2023.

    But the B-21 won’t just be about the large, flying wing aircraft that rolled out in Palmdale, Calif., on Dec. 2. Air Force officials have frequently spoken about the Raider becoming the lead element of a so-called “family of systems,” and Air Force Secretary Frank Kendall has made defining that family of systems one of his seven “operational imperatives” for the department.

    What exactly will be included in that family remains unknown, but a new research paper from the Mitchell Institute for Aerospace Studies, informed by an unclassified workshop that gathered Air Force leaders, planners, and operators along with industry partners, offers some insight into what might be considered.

    “What we haven’t heard much about is the family of systems that is going to accompany [the B-21]. Just dribs and drabs of information. So this report might actually help … get a handle on some of the capabilities that might be in that family of systems, including weapons, that could help reduce risk and increase the effectiveness of our combat forces,” said retired Col. Mark Gunzinger, the Mitchell Institute’s director of future concepts and capability assessments and a co-author of the paper.

    The three-day workshop, held this summer, was meant in part to develop concepts for what the Air Force calls “autonomous collaborative platforms”—relatively cheap drones that can fly alongside manned aircraft, operating with some level of independence.

    The most high-profile example of these ACPs has been the Air Force’s planned collaborative combat aircraft, intended mainly for fighters. But Caitlin Lee, one of the workshop’s leads and co-author of the paper, noted that in discussions with the Air Force Research Laboratory, officials have said they envision “a whole family of potential capabilities and a range of different mission sets that this could actually involve.”

    The workshop was aimed at exploring one of those mission sets—the long-range penetrating strike mission that the B-21 will take on. Three teams of experts were tasked with designing up to three kinds of unmanned aircraft to aid the bomber in strikes against an air base, a maritime threat, and a transporter erector launcher in a hypothetical conflict with China in 2030.

    In all three cases, no constraints were put on what kind of aircraft the teams could create, but none of them opted for an “exquisite unmanned fighter” or “exquisite unmanned bomber” that could match the B-21’s range, Lee noted. That’s in line with Kendall’s own comments this past July that the department had determined that a long-range uncrewed escort for the B-21 was cost-prohibitive.

    Instead, the three teams created a mix of UAVs, most with a range of a few thousand miles, a few launched from other bombers. And the capabilities given to each varied as well—some designed to provide defensive counterair; others as intelligence, surveillance, and reconnaissance platforms gathering data; others for suppression of enemy air defenses; and still others as escorts.

    More:::
    What Could Be Part of the B-21 ‘Family of Systems'? New Report Offers Some Insight | Air & Space Forces Magazine
     
  18. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    18,973
    Likes Received:
    5,931
    Gamera crawling around on his knees.
     
  19. Biak

    Biak Boy from Illinois Staff Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2009
    Messages:
    9,328
    Likes Received:
    2,629
    Just for Schitt's and Giggles I took the online Mensa test. I was sitting here in northern Minnesota when it was Minus 25 degrees (minus 31.6 Celsius ) and was wondering if maybe there was something to the fact people said I was insane or put politely not that intelligent ! Missed my card by ten points. Should have considered taking more than Freshman Algebra in high school. The trigonometry tricked me up. But then again, I was in my Sixties and thought what the hell, at this stage of my life I'm not going anywhere. I was smart enough to not go outside, so that was a plus.
     
  20. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,092
    Likes Received:
    3,393
    Knowledge and intelligence go hand in hand, but are different...Its possible to have a lot of one and little of the other.

    “In reality, a genuine IQ test doesn't have maths in it, beyond very basic arithmetic. An IQ tests assesses logic, pattern recognition and speed of thought, not learned knowledge."
     

Share This Page