Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Rimmed, Rimless and semi-rimmed

Discussion in 'The Guns Galore Section' started by dave phpbb3, Oct 29, 2005.

  1. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    Does haveing a rim on the cartridge affect the bullet in anyway?
    or does it affect the accuracy or reliabilty of a gun?
     
  2. Notmi

    Notmi New Member

    Joined:
    May 1, 2004
    Messages:
    1,958
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Suomi Finland Perkele
    via TanksinWW2
    I believe that only thing rim affects is reliability and maybe a bit with accuracy (rim helps closing chamber).
    Rim has more to do with gun action.
     
  3. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    ok thank you i already have information on the rim inside the mechanism so thanks anyway Notmi
     
  4. JCalhoun

    JCalhoun New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 7, 2004
    Messages:
    1,911
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Mobile, Alabama- Heart of Dixie
    via TanksinWW2
    Rims are primarily used on straight wall cartridges to provide a stopping point when loaded into the chamber. Shouldered cartridges don't need rims as the shoulders stop in the chamber.

    Rims are on a lot of older cartridges with sholders like the .303 Brit and 7.62X54R Russian. This is because when they were developed, the current technology was rim oriented and the developers simply went with proven technology.

    Rimless cartridges feed more reliably and give more room in the magazine.

    Some match shooters who use rimmed ammo (rimfire and revolver) check the rim thickness on the cases as they believe different rim thickness positions the case differently in the chamber.
     
  5. Tony Williams

    Tony Williams Member

    Joined:
    Jul 28, 2002
    Messages:
    1,006
    Likes Received:
    23
    via TanksinWW2
    If it had any bad effects, the British wouldn't have kept the .303 for nearly 70 years, nor would the Russians still be using the 7.62x54R in front-line weapons after more than 110 years.

    Tony Williams: Military gun and ammunition website and discussion forum
     
  6. Revere

    Revere New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Iowa, US
    via TanksinWW2
    speackin gof the Brits do they still use the same Handgernade?
     
  7. Simonr1978

    Simonr1978 New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 24, 2004
    Messages:
    3,392
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Kent, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    The same Handgrenade as when? Last week? Last century?

    The 1940s era genade is no longer in use.
     
  8. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Just had an amusing image of British infantrymen storming forward in Iraq throwing 'pomegranite'-type grenades with lit fuses! :lol:
     

Share This Page