Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The Planes That WON the War in the Pacific

Discussion in 'Air War in the Pacific' started by EagleSquadron12, Jan 23, 2017.

  1. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Deleted. Post by mistake.
     
    Last edited: Apr 9, 2021
    Thumpalumpacus likes this.
  2. Thumpalumpacus

    Thumpalumpacus Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2021
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    66
    I edited that post while you were replying, to add a point.
     
  3. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    Yes, early in the Gudalcanal campaign before Henderson was firmly established and Halsey's strike on Rabaul.

    No, the carriers never did commerce interdiction until very late in the war. Halsey's South China Sea venture comes to mind. The subs were assigned more to high traffic areas, choke points for their patrols.

    I was thinking more along the lines of destroyers and PT Boats interdicting Japanese barge traffic in the Solomons.
     
  4. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    My internet and cell were slow...I thought I was typing, but in reality, I quoted you and it posted with just your quote, but nothing I had typed.
     
    Thumpalumpacus likes this.
  5. Thumpalumpacus

    Thumpalumpacus Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2021
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    66
    Also in Nov 43, when Saratoga and Princeton (if my memory serves) launched attacks on Simpson Harbor. This was well after the 'Canal was secured.

    Yeah, I wasn't thinking of that at all, but you're dead right, shutting off the Tokyo Express. I suppose I was fixated on strategic resupply interdiction in the CenPac, appreciate the reminder to look outside my own thinking.
     
  6. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    This was a one-off emergency. The Japanese had sortied a sizeable heavy cruiser force to attack the US invasion fleet at Cape Torokina, Bougainville. The US light cruiser & destroyer covering force was heavily engaged by both Japanese sea & air forces, and although they had suffered only light damage, they had to retire to refuel. Allied land-based air could they guarantee success against such pinpoint targets(they launched many large raids against Rabaul beginning in mid-October, but had minimal success against naval targets there). Thus, Halsey decided to use Saratoga & Princeton to take out the heavy cruiser threat. To do this all aircraft from the carriers would sortie on the attack, while USAAF land-based fighters would rendezvous over the US carriers to provide CAP while the carrier fighter were away attacking Rabaul. Here again, it was the divebomber that accrued the majority of the laurels in the attack, while the torpedo bombers achieved very little (2 hits, both duds).

    That is what most folks know about the Pacific War, no harm, no foul, as, in a sense, it does apply. The submarines helped to cut the flow of supplies from major distribution point to major distribution point. The destroyers, PTs, etc. helped to cut the vines leading from the closest major distribution centers to individual islands.
     
  7. Thumpalumpacus

    Thumpalumpacus Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2021
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    66
    Beyond that, I can't think of any other use of CVs in the Solomons after the battles of 1942. That rather supports what I'm saying, that island-hopping was about gaining island airbases for extending air coverage, for further offensive operations without using carriers.

    Two different combat regimes, vastly different requirements, handled with aplomb. Not sure there's much if any disagreement between us.
     
    bronk7 likes this.
  8. Takao

    Takao Ace

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2010
    Messages:
    10,103
    Likes Received:
    2,574
    Location:
    Reading, PA
    No disagreement, just exploration of matters in detail.
     
    Thumpalumpacus likes this.
  9. Thumpalumpacus

    Thumpalumpacus Active Member

    Joined:
    Feb 28, 2021
    Messages:
    179
    Likes Received:
    66
    Fo sho. Nimitz wanted those carriers in his back-pocket in case the Decisive BattleĀ® broke out.

    Even in CenPac, seeking islands which could support B-24s/PB4Y/PBY-5A ops was useful, and that was in TF38/58's back yard.
     

Share This Page