Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Tiger I wasn´t so bad.......

Discussion in 'Armor and Armored Fighting Vehicles' started by Bundesluftwaffe, Feb 3, 2015.

  1. Pacifist

    Pacifist Active Member

    Joined:
    May 17, 2014
    Messages:
    406
    Likes Received:
    90
    Sorry just realized how badly I put that.

     
    Martin Bull likes this.
  2. Bundesluftwaffe

    Bundesluftwaffe New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 4, 2014
    Messages:
    507
    Likes Received:
    22
    @ Pacifist: Would he have been faster and cheaper to build it would be a good tank for the strategic situation, cause when Tigggger was planned, Germany was still believing to be on the winning side - means the big catastrophes were after Tiger development. I pointed out Tiger2/Elefant etc. were totally absurd....which is also proven by the post war German tank (Leo1) which was the total opposite to Tiger1/2. Leo1 is quite weakly armored, therefore good punch to it´s time also very fast manouvrable and reliable. So Germans learned from mistakes. Leo1 would later receive better armor, but first models were thin.
     

Share This Page