What If we didn't have so many What If threads?

Skipper · Nov 16, 2007

Maybe we should start a special thread for him, or send him private messages?

TA152 · Nov 16, 2007

I have never seen a head implode before. Can you send me some pictures Martin ?

A happy and long marriage to Mr and Mrs Otto !

Erich · Nov 16, 2007

ah Ta are you really sure you want to see pics of something like that ? seriously I have

yes happy groove for the two lovers and many many years to come

Sloniksp · Nov 16, 2007

This is great news!!!! Congrats and may your life together be filled with nothing other then happiness!

Today's first shot of Vodka will be in honor of Otto and Trouble!

eeek · Nov 16, 2007

chocapic said:

I think it's pretty easy to avoid the worse what-ifs, just judging by the title of the thread, or reading the 1st post in case of a doubt.

This way, you don't waste your time or nerves with a totaly unarticulated and unelaborated what-if, or with the "wet-dream" what-if type, Za was mentioning above.
Click to expand...

Thats right if you don't like 'What ifs", just exercise you right not to read any further....thats what most of us do.

Za Rodinu · Nov 16, 2007

lwd said:

Here's a link:
Axis History Forum :: WI Guidelines & Time Expansion-PLEASE READ CAREFULLY

The moderators are fairly ruthless about killing threads that don't measure up or merging similar ones.
Click to expand...

The full quote says:

By it’s very definition a “What If” isn’t a clean-cut issue that has rigid Black & White boundaries, rather a large expanse of Grey. However this Grey still needs to have some sort of context.

The What If’s need to be a plausible variation on actual military/political events occurring up to the end of 1985 (what about 1933-1947 for us?)or viable alternatives in their conception. This is a vital pre-requisite to any What If thread, if they do not meet this requirement they will locked or removed.

Remember before posting, check using the Search facility that your proposed question hasn’t been discussed before, if it has then; add your opinion to that existing thread. This results in concise and informative threads, rather than disjointed and fractured ones.

When you post the thread, don’t just ask the question but give us the benefit of your viewpoint and information to back up your argument, as this helps to put the question into context.

By abiding by these simple rules the What If area of the Forum won’t descend into the type of environment that saw the demise of the Poll Section. So please no stupid, nonsense or offensive threads, and if in doubt about whether your proposed Thread is a viable one-then just contact either Marcus or one of the Moderators.

Remember it is you the potential poster, on whose success or failure this part of the Forum rests on.
Click to expand...

I find this very, very sensible! What do the moderators say?

Slipdigit · Nov 16, 2007

It is being discussed as this thread grows in length.

Erich · Nov 16, 2007

as you said Jeff it is being discussed by the mods/admin team

what-if we closed this thread as it has run it's course

Za Rodinu · Nov 16, 2007

Amen to that!

Mussolini · Nov 16, 2007

DONE.

Log in or Sign up

What If we didn't have so many What If threads?

Skipper Kommodore

TA152 Ace

Erich Alte Hase

Sloniksp Ставка

eeek Member

Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

Erich Alte Hase

Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

Mussolini Gaming Guru WW2|ORG Editor

Share This Page

About US

Useful Links