Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

For Those Interested in Archaeology

Discussion in 'Free Fire Zone' started by GRW, Jan 19, 2009.

  1. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    Cyanobacteria

    Cyanobacteria: Fossil Record
    The oldest known fossils, in fact, are cyanobacteria from Archaean rocks of western Australia, dated 3.5 billion years old. This may be somewhat surprising, since the oldest rocks are only a little older: 3.8 billion years old! Cyanobacteria are among the easiest microfossils to recognize.


    Western Australia - 3.5 Billion years old...You see what I mean when I say Australia is OLD.
    Australia is the flattest continent on Earth because all our mountains have been worn down!
     
    GRW likes this.
  2. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Ah, but they didn't actually say the Loch Torridon one was the oldest fossil, just that it may be the oldest multicellular animal on record. :D:p;)
     
  3. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    Yeah sorry, i'm just triggered whenever I see the word oldest...Can you call this thing an "animal"?

    Cyanobacteria fossil...

    [​IMG]
     
  4. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    The oldest known animal is my cousin Ernie Joe, who is 103.
     
    CAC likes this.
  5. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Well, I wouldn't know one way or the other mate. Biology was never my strong point lol.
     
    OpanaPointer likes this.
  6. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    If they're right, this is a major breakthrough.
    "A bloody Anglo Saxon conflict believed to have taken place in Liverpool which forged modern England is seen by historians as one of the most significant battles in British history but remains largely unknown to its people.
    The Battle of Brunanburh in 937AD saw King Aethelstan's English forces fight a Viking-led alliance in a brutal combat which saw six kings and seven earls killed.
    At the time of the battle, Britain was a divided nation ruled by the Celts in the far north, the Earls of Northumberland (of Norse, viking decent) in the north of England and most of Ireland while the Anglo Saxons controlled central and southern England.
    Brunanburh saw the Anglo Saxons go head to head with a joint army of Celts and Norse warriors.
    The site of the battle has been a mystery despite its historical significance, with archaeologists most recently claiming it took place near Liverpool."
    www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-9532515/How-Anglo-Saxon-warriors-took-Viking-led-enemy-alliance-Battle-Brunanburh.html
     
    Kai-Petri and OpanaPointer like this.
  7. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    That would have been a battle to bring the pop corn for...
     
  8. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Yep.
     
  9. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    [​IMG]
     
    TD-Tommy776, CAC and GRW like this.
  10. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    It's Ivar the Boneless!
     
    OpanaPointer likes this.
  11. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    Gareth Graybeard...on a bazerka rage...
     
    GRW and OpanaPointer like this.
  12. TD-Tommy776

    TD-Tommy776 Man of Constant Sorrow

    Joined:
    Jun 3, 2011
    Messages:
    7,232
    Likes Received:
    1,286
    Location:
    The Land of 10,000 Loons
    Or maybe they just decided to move to New Zealand. ;)
     
  13. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    Zealandia, please.
     
    GRW likes this.
  14. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    " A newly-identified sabre-toothed cat that lived in North America five to nine million years ago weighed some 600 pounds and could have taken down prey ten times its size.
    US researchers named the ferocious feline 'Machairodus lahayishupup' to honour the Cayuse people, on whose lands the original specimen was unearthed.
    In Old Cayuse, 'Laháyis Húpup' means ancient wild cat, while 'Machairodus' is a known genus of giant, sabre-toothed cats from North America, Africa, Eurasia.
    The team believe that the newly-identified species existed early in the evolution of the sabre-toothed cats, but more research will be needed to confirm this.
    M. lahayishupup is also a relative of Smilodon — arguably the best known of sabre-toothed cats — which went extinct around 10,000 years ago.
    The new species was identified mainly from its massive forearms, a feature which sabre-toothed cats used to subdue their prey."
    www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9540887/Fossils-Newly-identified-sabre-toothed-cat-9-million-years-ago-weighed-600-pounds.html
     
  15. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,968
    Just pictured smilodons arm wrestling with those huge armadillos. God I love morphine.
     
  16. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    "Humans are actively changing landscapes across the globe, but shaping ecosystems is not just a modern activity – our ancestors started the transformation nearly 100,000 years ago.
    An analysis of settlements and paleoenvironmental data along the northern shores of East Africa's Lake Malawi reveals ancient inhabitants used fire 92,000 years ago to prevent forest regrowth.
    These Stone Age humans burned surrounding forests to make room for a growing population, which resulted in a sprawling bushland that stretches across the region today.
    The Yale-led study uncovered settlements in the area built 92,000 years ago, along with a surge of charcoal deposits in the core of the lake that appeared shortly after – allowing researchers to piece the story together.
    Jessica Thompson, assistant professor of anthropology in the Faculty of Arts and Sciences and the paper's lead author, said: 'This is the earliest evidence I have seen of humans fundamentally transforming their ecosystem with fire.
    'It suggests that by the Late Pleistocene, humans were learning to use fire in truly novel ways. In this case, their burning caused replacement of the region's forests with the open woodlands you see today.'"
    www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-9547265/Humans-used-FIRE-transform-environment-92-000-years-ago-Africa.html
     
  17. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    Australian Aboriginals have done this for thousands of years in Australia...It is said that they have turned forested areas into semi arid lands and semi arid lands into arid lands...(So many deserts)...Done partly to reduce fuel, partly to encourage regrowth...but even, and this article doesn't mention it, simply to scare prey to run out of an area into the waiting arms (spears) of the hunters...always seemed an expensive (and lazy) way of catching food...bit like dynamiting a lake for a few fish.
     
  18. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,245
    Likes Received:
    3,468
    GRW likes this.
  19. Kai-Petri

    Kai-Petri Kenraali

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2002
    Messages:
    26,469
    Likes Received:
    2,208
    The serbs liked to shot with canons the 1984 THE PREVIOUS ICE HALL ( JUST CANNOT MAKE THE LETTERS SMALL....)

    [​IMG]

    tHE ROOFLESS ICE HALL IS ON THE LEFT.
     
  20. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,143
    Likes Received:
    3,267
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Exciting news from Scotland. The 4 to 5,000-year-old carvings of animals discovered by Hamish Fenton at Dunchraigaig Cairn in Kilmartin Glen are the first such animal depictions known from Neolithic or Early Bronze Age Scotland-
     
    OpanaPointer and Kai-Petri like this.

Share This Page