Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

TIGER I (Late Production) ?

Discussion in 'Weapons & Technology in WWII' started by SGT. SHLITZ, Oct 3, 2007.

  1. SGT. SHLITZ

    SGT. SHLITZ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    5
    I just purchased a 1/35 Tiger I model kit and I was wondering if someone could please tell me if all late production Tiger Is had zimmeret applied to the sides?

    Thanx in advance,
    Shlitz
     
  2. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Zimmerit was introduced Sept. '43 & discontinued September '44 (If I remember right).
    Tiger1 was produced until August '44.
    So theoretically all late production ones should be zimmeritted.
    Though as this is the crazy world of German tanks this doesn't necesarily mean that all were.
    The Vimoutiers Tiger is a 1944 product but doesn't appear to have the paste anywhere other than on the glacis step... hard to tell from grainy black and white pictures though: The Vimoutiers Tiger.

    I sympathise with the modellers fear of Zimmerit... I've avoided it succesfully myself so far ;).

    Cheers,
    Adam.
     
  3. Erich

    Erich Alte Hase

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    14,439
    Likes Received:
    617
    this is dependent on theater, remember that most of the Königstigers had Zimmeritt coating while serving on the Ost front, so in same the Tiger I
     
  4. Martin Bull

    Martin Bull Acting Wg. Cdr

    Joined:
    Jun 20, 2002
    Messages:
    13,578
    Likes Received:
    1,487
    Location:
    London, England.
    In the 1970s, the Vimoutiers Tiger had fragments of original Zimmerit still attached ( see the cover of After The Battle # 8 ) but this was removed by over-zealous French 'restorers'.....:(
     
  5. SGT. SHLITZ

    SGT. SHLITZ Member

    Joined:
    Sep 2, 2007
    Messages:
    50
    Likes Received:
    5
    O.k. Thanx fellas! I'm gonna go with zimmerit. Grrrrr.
    I found a resin set that just glues on top. I'll just go with that.
     
  6. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    Interesting thing about Zimmerit, it was produced as a counter to magnetic anti-tank mines, but none of the Allies ever used a magnetic anti-tank mine ??????
     
  7. Erich

    Erich Alte Hase

    Joined:
    May 13, 2001
    Messages:
    14,439
    Likes Received:
    617
    actually for the sticky mine on the Ost front really
     
  8. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    Due you have any info on this weapon ?
    Its unknown to me.

    ps, zimmerit was designed as a counter for magnetic mines
    Zimmerit - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
     
  9. Za Rodinu

    Za Rodinu Aquila non capit muscas

    Joined:
    May 12, 2003
    Messages:
    8,809
    Likes Received:
    372
    Location:
    Portugal
  10. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    We've been through this here and 'elsewhere'. ;)
    http://www.ww2f.com/information-requests/15365-zimmerit-paste-magnetic-mines.html

    There was a thing called the Magnetic Clam Charge/Mine that was supplied to the soviets in tens of thousands as aid (Illustrated here) but as it's only an 8oz charge I still can't see it as an anti-armour weapon.
    There's also, I suppose, captured Hafthohlladung (and possibly very limited 'clones' thereof rings a very small bell), but I can't see that being seen as a convincing enough threat to necessitate zimmerit either.

    I stick by the belief that Zimmerit was the Germans taking a somewhat 'belt & braces' approach and defending against a weapon that wasn't really being fielded against them. No harm in whacking a few pounds of paste on just in case, but if they found it genuinely worthwhile I don't believe it would have been withdrawn in '44. Not being made with any strategic or rare materials (as the British found to their chagrin after analysing the stuff).

    Cheers,
    Adam.

    (sorry, cross-posted with za's links above... must read them now... mildly fascinated with the stuff.)
     
  11. skunk works

    skunk works Ace

    Joined:
    Nov 12, 2005
    Messages:
    2,156
    Likes Received:
    104
    The "Coal" mine, and the "Rock" mine are good, but the "Turd" mine is my favorite.
    Pretty sneaky
     
  12. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
    Millsgrenades is a fine little site.
    I recommend this page for maximum jealousy at the things some people have in their collections ;) :
    The Box

    Cheers,
    Adam.
     
  13. uksubs

    uksubs Member

    Joined:
    Jul 14, 2007
    Messages:
    547
    Likes Received:
    36
    The British had a sticky bomb to - no 74 sticky bomb :eek:
     
  14. redcoat

    redcoat Ace

    Joined:
    Aug 24, 2002
    Messages:
    1,523
    Likes Received:
    142
    The No 74 grenade's only known combat use was as a demolition device by partisans, it was never used by the British army in combat.
     

Share This Page