Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The main reason of why Nazis lost the War???

Discussion in 'WWII General' started by flammpanzer, Dec 22, 2008.

  1. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    And,I like to add the following :
    tons of bombs dropped on Germany for the whole war :
    BC:964,644
    8 th Air Force:623,418
     
  2. urqh

    urqh Tea drinking surrender monkey

    Joined:
    Dec 23, 2002
    Messages:
    9,683
    Likes Received:
    955
    and Hitler would have conquered England during operation Sea Lion.,,,,,,

    Oh not again...If he could he would. He couldnt, and he didnt.
     
    von Poop likes this.
  3. axis ascendent

    axis ascendent Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
  4. axis ascendent

    axis ascendent Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    why don't You?
     
  5. axis ascendent

    axis ascendent Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    Hitler is powerful er than Stalin. For every German casualty there is at least5 Soviet casualties
     
  6. axis ascendent

    axis ascendent Dishonorably Discharged

    Joined:
    Oct 10, 2011
    Messages:
    5
    Likes Received:
    0
    No once Soviet Union is beaten then the Germans could focus on U boat production and technology. They would wipe out the British Navy. then they would wipe out the British air force and after that nothing can stop Hitler from taking over England
     
  7. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    This is irrelevant and out of context (you are forgetting-or you don't know that the SU was mobilizing 30 million men,and that the Germans never had more than 3 million on the eastfront):the result was :the Soviets at Berlin,not the Germans at Moscow .
     
  8. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    :D
    A lot of nonsens:maybe you should read "The Wages of Destruction",there never was any possibility for the Germans to starve Britain with the UBoats,and,probably you don't know:in 1940;there was something as the Battle of Britain,and,guess who won .
    And,there would always be something stopping Hitler from taking over Britain :the Channell .
     
  9. scipio

    scipio Member

    Joined:
    Jul 8, 2011
    Messages:
    652
    Likes Received:
    122
    How this for an idea.

    Hitler is responsible because he ejected all the nuclear physicists scientists, mostly but not exclusively Jewish, who could have won him the War. In the 1920s Germany was the hot bed of nuclear science - most of them emigrated to the USA and built the bomb. Those who remained including the Max Plankt, quantum theory, refused to co-operated with Hitler (so did Max's son who was executed) - only Heisenberg (maybe) co-operated.

    Also many Jewish chemists such as Franz Habor, Jewish, who had saved Germany in WW1 by replacing guano and producing a synthetic substitute for ammonium nitrate the base for all explosives were forced out. Carl Bosch his co-worker and head of IG Farben (actually IG Farben in 1933 was very suspect to the Nazis because so many Jewish scientists were employed - soon cleared out) tried to save his friend Franz by arguing with Hitler that there were good Jews ie Harbor and bad ones - waste of time Harbor was forced out in 1933 and Bosch emigrated to Switzerland in 1940 and took to alcohol which led to his death not long after.
     
  10. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Bull, there is no evidence the Germans could a) defeat the Soviet Union, or b) build more U-boats than they did, or c) wipe out both the RN or the RAF. They simply didn't have the manufacturing capacity nor the fuel to power the units they couldn't build.
     
  11. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    Again? Didn't we dispose of this many times before? Hitler had no means of defeating the Soviets. If he could not defeat them, then the other scenarios are mere pipe dreams. The Nazis had no means of producing more U-boats or making more planes. This whole thing is hogwash.
     
  12. Sloniksp

    Sloniksp Ставка

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2006
    Messages:
    6,321
    Likes Received:
    460
    :rofl:


    You are in the wrong place.
     
    Colonel FOG likes this.
  13. Colonel FOG

    Colonel FOG Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    22
    The main reason Germany lost the war is because they started it.
     
  14. ptimms

    ptimms Member

    Joined:
    Jul 4, 2011
    Messages:
    294
    Likes Received:
    98
    Lets face it gents you are not going to have a reasonable discussion on this with someone called "axis ascendent" . He obvioulsy has an agenda and that is he cannot believe his beloved Hitler, Germany and SS lost. It was only because the Allies cheated by having more of anything and if only Hitler had been able to "..... insert bizarre implausible theory of your choice here" then they could easily have won.

    Admit it "axis descending" there was more chance of Germany landing on the moon in '44 than defeating Russia (then you probably believe in Nazi flying saucers so think that was possible too).
     
    brndirt1 and LJAd like this.
  15. Skipper

    Skipper Kommodore

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    24,985
    Likes Received:
    2,386
    You are right ptimms and Ascendant flew this saucer himself :D
     
  16. Slipdigit

    Slipdigit Good Ol' Boy Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    May 21, 2007
    Messages:
    18,054
    Likes Received:
    2,376
    Location:
    Alabama
    Yes, you're correct. Astute observation.
     
  17. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,323
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
    You mean Hitler didn't land on the moon in '44? Where else would he establish his secret base?
     
  18. LJAd

    LJAd Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    Jul 11, 2009
    Messages:
    4,997
    Likes Received:
    237
    And with someone called "axis descendent"?
     
  19. Clementine

    Clementine Member

    Joined:
    Apr 6, 2011
    Messages:
    907
    Likes Received:
    254
    Personally, I always believed that once my father and his brothers joined the fight it was a done deal....

    Hey, if you guys can have the Hitler to the Moon theory, and the Axis guy can have, well, his take on things, I can have my own theory, right?
     
    LJAd and Biak like this.
  20. Colonel FOG

    Colonel FOG Member

    Joined:
    Sep 22, 2011
    Messages:
    212
    Likes Received:
    22
    I guess that some people (AA) can never let a bad thing die... argh!
    Clementine - A "Thank you" to your family members who served.
     

Share This Page