Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Info on the Landkrezuer p. 1000 Ratte

Discussion in 'Wonder Weapons' started by ZhukovRob, Jul 10, 2009.

  1. ZhukovRob

    ZhukovRob recruit

    Joined:
    Jul 10, 2009
    Messages:
    3
    Likes Received:
    0
    Out of the all the extreme Axis experimental weapons this one seems the most outrageous. Hitler always said "Biggest is best" but come on? I've seen pictures of this behemouth but have almost no cold hard facts about it. Anybody know anything about it?
    [​IMG]
     
  2. LRusso216

    LRusso216 Graybeard Staff Member

    Joined:
    Jan 5, 2009
    Messages:
    14,325
    Likes Received:
    2,622
    Location:
    Pennsylvania
  3. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    I think this was merely a theoretical design made by German engineers for play & creative research and it was never under any serious consideration whatsoever.
     
  4. Sentinel

    Sentinel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    47
    Nevertheless it would have been awesome if the Nazis had been stupid enough to build one. :D
     
  5. Wolfy

    Wolfy Ace

    Joined:
    Dec 24, 2008
    Messages:
    1,900
    Likes Received:
    90
    They built wasteful monstrosities of this sort like their Rail guns. These weapons could only used a few times and in a few situations before they had to be withdrawn.
     
  6. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,969
    Hmmm. Ground pressure. Fording ability. Speed. Fuel capacity. Ammo carrying capacity. Problems, problems, problems.

    Remember, Armor + Mobility + Firepower = 1. Mobility would be a negative number in this case. Very fun concept, however.
     
  7. von Poop

    von Poop Waspish

    Joined:
    Apr 21, 2006
    Messages:
    6,309
    Likes Received:
    1,924
    Location:
    Perfidious Albion
  8. fast1

    fast1 Member

    Joined:
    Mar 21, 2009
    Messages:
    223
    Likes Received:
    5
  9. General_Patton

    General_Patton Member

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    2
    They actually did start construction of this sometime during the war, but they realized that it would require too much manpower and too many resources so they decided to scrap the project. If they had continued working on it, i believe they said it would have been finished by the year of 1949.
     
  10. Kruska

    Kruska Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    190
    Well they did a good job at Sevastopol

    Regards
    Kruska
     
  11. Kruska

    Kruska Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    190
    I know that Patton was a bit insane :D, but were did "you" get this information from?

    Regards
    Kruska
     
  12. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    What was the "cost benefit" ratio in that single operation of the Dora/Gustav?

    How many manhours were involved in construction, transportation, logistics compared to "damage done". Could a small contingent of He-110s have not done the same damage at less cost?

    Those things were just silly, hadn't that thing used up its barrel life in the operation? And needed to be withdrawn and re-barreled? Still, makes one shake his head in both awe at the size, and awe at the foolishness.

    America isn't immune to "silly" sometimes either, remember the "Atomic Annie" cannon? About as useful as an atomic hand grenade.
     
    Miguel B. likes this.
  13. Kruska

    Kruska Member

    Joined:
    Aug 17, 2008
    Messages:
    1,866
    Likes Received:
    190
    Hello brndirt1,

    you are right about the cost analysis - but sometimes you can't avoid it.

    Since the conventional weaponary incl. Luftwaffe failed, the Wehrmacht brought in the biggies - and they did the job.

    Perfect example would be the US Army until today viewed upon as a whole - endless ammo, a batallion and weaponary to the extreme to take out a foxhole with two guy's - it just seems that the US have the $$ for that kind of tactical engagements.

    Regards
    Kruska
     
  14. Sentinel

    Sentinel Member

    Joined:
    Nov 15, 2008
    Messages:
    365
    Likes Received:
    47
    To be fair, I think the rail guns "Gustav" and "Dora" were reasonable developments for the specific task they were meant to fulfil -- smashing the Maginot Line.

    In the actual war, though, the Maginot Line was bypassed, leaving these guns without a purpose.

    The waste of effort was exacerbated by sending them many hundreds of miles to the Eastern Front, instead of a few dozen miles to the West as had been originally intended.

    Notwithstanding the above, if the Germans had developed a heavy bomber/penetrating bomb combination like the Lancaster/Tallboy, it would have been a much better and more flexible weapon.
     

Share This Page