Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

The top 10 reasons you know your employer has switched to Obamacare

Discussion in 'The Stump' started by T. A. Gardner, May 17, 2010.

  1. T. A. Gardner

    T. A. Gardner Genuine Chief

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2003
    Messages:
    6,212
    Likes Received:
    940
    Location:
    Phoenix Arizona
    10. The deduction for the company health care plan disappears from your paycheck but your paycheck gets 20% smaller...

    9. None of the doctors on your new health care plan speak english.

    8. The approved provider list for your new plan comes on a 3 x 5 index card

    7. When you ask the doctor for a second opinion he has the nurse come in and tell you he's right.

    6. The waiting room smells faintly of Lysol and city garbage dump.

    5. Your doctor's office now has a drive-thru window.

    4. Your pharmacy's address is listed as a street corner.

    3. For preventative care your plan gives you an outdated copy of Norton Anti-virus

    2. Your "end of life" councilling is with a guy named Kevorkian

    1. You are right behind the collie and the cocker spaniel to be seen
     
    Shadow Master and texson66 like this.
  2. ULITHI

    ULITHI Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,905
    Likes Received:
    431
    Location:
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    Hahahahahahaha!!! That's awesome!!!
     
  3. C.Evans

    C.Evans Expert

    Joined:
    Nov 28, 2000
    Messages:
    25,883
    Likes Received:
    857
    Sadly, it might come true. Im already seeing my Ins double what I used to pay per month as well as fewer Drs available to me. I cant wait till that snake and its nest of snakes are all out of office. I cant remember ever-when I saw so many freaks running the Govt-not even under jimmy carter nor even under slick willy clinton.
     
  4. Skipper

    Skipper Kommodore

    Joined:
    Jun 6, 2006
    Messages:
    24,985
    Likes Received:
    2,386
    George III maybe?

    [​IMG]
     
    C.Evans likes this.
  5. revbucky

    revbucky Member

    Joined:
    Apr 30, 2010
    Messages:
    124
    Likes Received:
    2
    Funny and sadly right on the mark.
     
  6. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,969
    Same jokes when Social Security passed. Never any originality.
     
  7. texson66

    texson66 Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 12, 2008
    Messages:
    3,095
    Likes Received:
    592
    Social security = Giant Ponzi Scheme cooked up by democratic politicians and never really challenged by the repubs.

    It was great when the age population pyramid had 1 retired person for every 10 workers. Now not so good; oh, and your SS money was never in a lock box with your name; just an IOU from Congress now...But SS still buys votes (sadly)
     
  8. OpanaPointer

    OpanaPointer I Point at Opana Staff Member WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Jun 5, 2008
    Messages:
    19,193
    Likes Received:
    5,969
    If you're going to quote Thomas Dewey you should give him credit. ;)
     
  9. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    As OP mentioned, great quote from Dewey. Another thing to keep in mind here, not only are there fewer paying into the SS fund as the years go on, the life expectancy has increased over the years as well. When Social Security was first implimented the average life span for a working male was 59.9 years, and a female was 63.9 years. That would increase from that level in 1935 over the years but wouldn’t be much over 65 until 1960 when the men made it to 66.6 and women hit 73.1 years.

    See:

    Life Expectancy at Birth by Race and Sex, 1930–2005 — Infoplease.com

    Fewer workers paying in, people living longer and collecting longer as well.
     
  10. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    I think you are slightly incorrect here as well "texson", more Republicans voted for Social Security, in both houses of Congress than voted against it.

    In the Senate 16 vote yay, and only 5 voted nay. In the House, 81 voted yay, 15 voted nay.

    Ironically the same number of House members from the Democratic side of the aisle voted against the bill as Republicans, i.e. 15.

    In the Senate, the same number of Senators (9) registered a "non-vote" in both parties by either not voting at all, saying "I abstain", or simply saying "present". Nine Democrats, nine Republicans took that course.
     

Share This Page