Dive Bombing a B-17 Dive Bombing a B-17 WWII History by Donald K. Burleson January 27, 2010 The first year of WWII in the Pacific was a disaster for America. The Navy was devastated by the cowardly sneak attack at Pearl Harbor, the Army suffered the crushing surrender at Bataan and the war crime murders in the Brutal Bataan death march. The Army Air Corp. was also decimated, chased by the Japanese from the Philippines and across the south pacific, all the way to Australia. America wanted revenge, but we were outnumbered and out-gunned by a brutal enemy who would behead American prisoners. This is the story of how a small group of airmen in the 19th Bomb Group made a daring raid over Rabaul Harbor, using a B-17 as a dive bomber to sink an enemy ship. The B-17 is a large heavy 4-engine bomber, not designed to work as a dive bomber, but we were desperate for a victory over the Japanese, and desperate times called for desperate measures. Rabaul harbor was a major Japanese port, heavy guarded by Flack cannons and machine guns, impenetrable in daylight. The only hope of a victory was to attack at night when the Japanese gunners could not see the B-17, but the cover of darkness worked both ways. Even with the top-secret Norden bombsights, they needed light to see the targets. And even if we could see the ships, a freighter is a mighty small target at 20,000 feet. Dive Bombing in a a B-17 After word got out about the Japanese atrocities at Bataan, morale was at a all time low and a small group of heroic young airmen decided to execute a bold attack against the Japanese. Gen. Bernard Schriever Lt. Col. Louis BurlesonBernie Schriever was a newly-minted Major fresh out of Stanford University with a masters degree in engineering and a bold plan. He and my father (Louis F. Burleson) hatched a plan to surprise the Japanese with an attack so bold that it was almost suicidal. In total darkness, one B-17 crew would drop flares to light-up the ships in the harbor and then dive below the flack, directly into a hail of bullets and dump a bomb right on the deck of an enemy ship! Nobody had ever dared to dive bomb a B-17 in combat A B-17 is a large 4 engine machine, and this mission was carefully planned and executed. My father added a half-ton of hardened steel armor to protect the pilot and crew from the machine gun bullets, and Schriever carefully calculated the maximum amount of G force that the B-17 could take before the wings would fall off. There was no question that the aircraft would be heavily damaged and they calculated their probability of success at 50% and asked for volunteers, quickly finding a dozen brave men to fill the seats. It was a very risky endeavor. Americans knew that the Japanese did not like to take prisoners and American airmen would be beheaded. The Japanese were known for their war crimes, executing POW's My father designed the flare racks and volunteered to fly on this mission as flight engineer, manning the top turret gun on the B-17. It's not designed to do that! This bold planned called for some serious innovation. My father installed the flare racks and Schriever calculated the exact amount of bombs and fuel weight and how far he could push the envelope. The Japanese were not going to sit back quietly as their ships were destroyed, and success depended on a steep angle of attack, pulling enough G forces to bend the wings, but not break them. Of course, there were those narrow-minded airmen who called the plan crazy and mocked them, saying that "It's not designed to work that way". Flying into a hailstorm of bullets To achieve maximum surprise, they left before midnight to as to hit Rabaul right before sunrise. This was serious business, a high risk, high reward attack. Each man was ordered to write a last letter to their family and make out a last will and testament before leaving on the mission. This recollection is from an article about General Schriever in “Air Force” magazine: “They flew in a formation of about a dozen B-17s in a night raid on Rabaul. Their airplane carried the flares and half the regular bomb load. The flare system worked well, but Schriever wanted to check on the bombing results, so they made another circuit over the target area. Flak was heavy but ineffective at the 10,000-foot altitude from which they were bombing. As they turned, the No. 3 engine burst into a ball of flames. Dougherty, in the left seat, feathered the prop and shut the engine down. They still had bombs on board but did not want to set up another bombing approach. A quick conference on the intercom led to a decision: They would dive-bomb the ships in the harbor.” According to my father, the small arms fire was greater than expected and as the B17 nosed down below 2,000 feet the bullets hitting the ship sounded like rain on a tin roof, with bullets flying everywhere. The B-17 was badly damaged, flying on only 3 engines and hit by flack in six places and littered with hundreds of bullet holes. Through good piloting, Schriever managed to limp back to Australia where not a single square foot of the plane was not pierced by bullets. After the attack, my father found a machine gun bullet embedded in the steel armor that he welded to the bottom of his seat, and he joked that his planning-ahead saved him from a huge pain in the ass. Bernie Schriever got noticed by the top brass, eventually rising to 4 star general in the Air Force. Schriever Air Force Base in Colorado is named after Bernie Schriever. My father received the Distinguished Flying Cross for this mission. Here is the citation of the B-17 dive bombing raid from military records. Rabaul harbor was still classified and was blanked-out from the original release: "For meritorious achievement as gunner while participating in an aerial flight over ****, New Britain, on 23 September 1942. This officer and these enlisted men were crew members of a B-17 dispatched to drop flares and bombs in a night raid on a concentration of shipping at this enemy stronghold. After the flares were released, at least thirty vessels were observed in the harbor. The crew made eight bombing runs at 8,000 feet, but during each attempt, vision was obscured by a thin strata cloud. Despite a barrage of anti-aircraft fire from numerous ships and shore batteries, the B-17 dived to 1,500 feet and released three bombs over a group of four vessels. A direct hit was scored on a large cargo ship and a near miss on a 12,000 ton transport. Although the plane sustained six damaging hits by shell fragments, it managed to escape from the hail of fire. The courage and devotion to duty displayed by these crew members is worthy of commendation." It's this type of innovation that won WWII, open-minded airmen who were not afraid to push the limits and try new approaches to achieve their goals.
Cowardly attack on Pearl Harbor??? It took guts to pull that plan off. It isn't just a walk in the park to attack an enemy navy base.
I could buy into the idea of a low-level attack or maybe one involving a shallow dive approach, but the picture of a B17 in a Stuka-like dive defies belief in my opinion.
IIRC, it was either a shallow dive bombing attack or a dive with the bombs released during pull-out. But, don't take the "photo" tp seriously - It's a poor MSPaint job(guess they couldn't afford Photoshop). The B-17 was "lifted" from a fairly well know photo of a B-17 over England and what appears to be some "battle damage"(black splotch on the tail & tail gunner's position added for "dramatic effect."). They least they could have done was to change the markings to an aircraft that was actually in the same theater.
Easy big guy.....get a feel for the waters before you dive in I think you are right on the mark. High speed dive and release on pull out is the most resonable approach, and the only one that seems to fit the configuration of B-17s at the time.
The main allied heavy bomber used as a dive bomber was the B24 in its incarnation in the RAF Coastal Command. If a coastal command aircraft sighted a U Boat on the surface it were expected to attack with a stick of depth charges, ideally from a 5 O clock position. The attacks were performed as shallow dive bomb attack with the 20+ tonne aircraft starting at C 1,500 ft and pulling out at 300 ft. There were no dive bombing sights for for ther B24 and as far as I know bombing was by eye. Try it some time in the B24 in any computer flight simulator.
The history of the 617 squadron records then using Lancasters in dive attacks at night to correctly place flares, and from the description it was pretty scary. But that was from ace quality pilots and even then the role was taken over first by Mosquitos and finally by Mustangs (though I have a suspicion we are really talking about A36 not P51 here, one more item of ww2 trivia to research :i_surrender: ). Much depends on how steep a dive, the bomb release mechanisms of the heavy bombers are not likely to throw the bomb clean of the plane in a steep dive like a stuka or dauntless could do. Attacking in a shallow dive was used by many bombers to increase speed over the target to reduce exposure to AA fire (or the time for the sub to evade in the case of the B24).
"Glide Bombing" is the more appropriate term. General Kenny had his troops working on various low level tactics to attack shipping in Rabaul harbor during that period. B-25s in the 5th AF would later be famous for skip bombing attacks against shipping, but the tactic was actually being developed in August - September '42 using B-17s. Takao is correct - the B-17 in the photo belonged to the 8th AF, 91st BG, 322 BS and was named "The Careful Virgin". After being declared war weary, it was transfered to the Aphordite Project and launched against a V-1 site on 4 August 44.
