Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Mau-Mau can sue Britain

Discussion in 'Military History' started by GRW, Jul 21, 2011.

  1. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,164
    Likes Received:
    3,272
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    "Four elderly Kenyans have won an important fight in their battle for compensation over horrific acts of torture.
    The group, all in their 80s, say they were assaulted in British-run detention camps during the country’s war of independence.
    They allege 'unspeakable acts of brutality' during the Mau Mau rebellion against colonial rule between 1952 and 1960."
    Mau Mau uprising: Kenyans to sue British Government 59 years after atrocities | Mail Online
    And what about the many unspeakable acts of brutality perpetrated by the Mau-Mau?
     
    sniper1946 likes this.
  2. Triple C

    Triple C Ace

    Joined:
    Oct 12, 2008
    Messages:
    1,599
    Likes Received:
    230
    You can take it as an objective observation or a wisecrack, but winners of wars don't sue.
     
  3. ULITHI

    ULITHI Ace

    Joined:
    Mar 9, 2010
    Messages:
    1,905
    Likes Received:
    431
    Location:
    Albuquerque, New Mexico
    I remember the controvercy when President Obama was elected and he sent Churchill's bust back to Great Britain that was on loan to the previous administration after 9-11. It was speculated that it might have been because his grandfather (Hussein Onyango Obama) was rumored to be tortured during the rebellion, and of course it was during Churchill's second premiership.
     
  4. Mehar

    Mehar Ace

    Joined:
    Jan 21, 2009
    Messages:
    1,366
    Likes Received:
    115
    The article doesn't mention whether they were fighting in the rebellion or not.
     
  5. brndirt1

    brndirt1 Saddle Tramp

    Joined:
    Jul 7, 2008
    Messages:
    9,713
    Likes Received:
    1,501
    Darren, I think somebody is "mis-remembering" something here. The bust of Sir Winston had been on loan to Bush from Tony Blair’s government, by way of the British Embassy, to show solidarity with the US post 9/11. And it didn’t go back to Britain either, but back to the Embassy from whence it came.

    It was removed before Obama’s inauguration as part of the normal changeover operations in the Oval office. It hadn’t been sent to him, but to Bush after all. Bush wasn’t there anymore, so it was replaced with a bust of another great man; the Republican A. Lincoln (Obama’s historical hero I’ve heard).
     

Share This Page