Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Iran's Qaher-313

Discussion in 'Military History' started by GRW, Feb 2, 2013.

  1. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,206
    Likes Received:
    3,284
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Should the West worry?
    "Iran unveiled its newest combat jet, a domestically manufactured fighter-bomber, that military officials claim can evade radar.

    President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad said in a ceremony today broadcast on state TV that building the Qaher-313, or Dominant-313, shows Iran's will to 'conquer scientific peaks'.
    The Qaher is one of several aircraft designs rolled out by the Iranian military since 2007.
    Tehran has repeatedly claimed to have developed advanced military technologies in recent years but its claims cannot be independently verified because the country does not release technical details of its arsenals.
    The Islamic republic launched a self-sufficiency military program in the 1980s to compensate for a Western weapons embargo that banned export of military technology and equipment to Iran.
    Since 1992, Iran has produced its own tanks, armoured personnel carriers, missiles, torpedoes, drones and fighter planes.
    Defence Minister Ahmad Vahidi said: ‘Qaher-313 is a fully indigenous aircraft designed and built by our aerospace experts.
    ‘This is a radar-evading plane that can fly at low altitude, carry weapons, engage enemy aircrafts and land at short airstrips.’ "
    Iran unveils homemade fighter jet which it claims can evade radar | Mail Online

     
  2. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,229
    Likes Received:
    1,183
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Avionics are an important part of any modern aircraft, and I'm not completely convinced that the Iranians have the infrastructure to make modern combat-capable systems themselves. The plane itself looks interesting -- the nose and cockpit have a resemblance to the F-35 (albeit much smaller), while the faceted fusalage have some similarities with the old F-117.

    All that being said, does that aircraft look small to anyone? I have a hard time seeing this in production - something seems rather 'toy-like' to me.

    As a side note, the Daily Mail really needs to brush up when it comes to captions. That second picture down is the F-22 (not the F/A-18), and the last one is the F/A-18 (not the F-5). Although if their source is Iranian state news, I wouldn't be surprised ;)

    EDIT: and another thing; what's up with those intakes? They're way too small to be practical for any decent-sized jet engine.
     
  3. TiredOldSoldier

    TiredOldSoldier Ace

    Joined:
    Sep 14, 2008
    Messages:
    3,223
    Likes Received:
    452
    I would like to see a pic of the thing in flight, it has a "static mock up" look to.

    IMO they have a chance to get it to work, while a modern combat aircraft programme is a hugely complex task there'se plenty of out of work top level aerospace talent available and they have money.
    Compared to western programmes they are less likely to suffer from the internal industrial politics that plague western companies, "rewards" for failure or silverlining, while not on a Stalin scale are likely to discourage that, if they can get hold of a few top class engineers, and, besides the ex USSR there'se a lot of frustrated technical talent in the accountant/politica nominee dominated western industry, they could get the job done.
    Same goes for specialized components where they lack the manufacturing know how, despite US export control efforts the starved for business high tech industry is not going to look too deep into where the orders for "dual use" stuff is going to. The real weakness of that procurrement model is that the chance for "stuxnet like" sabotage is high, it's hard to do QA on a tecnlology you don't control, but they have probably learned from that mistake.
     
  4. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,277
    Likes Received:
    3,482
    Possibly for domestic or border propaganda...then again, info has been leaking like a seive of late so who freak'n knows...That said, it looks like a poor mock up to me...you could have smaller engines, not having the same speed as a F-22...the signature looks small...but if you have sats you can look down...A an infiltrator aircraft it has its possibilities...? Smells like...looks like...i wonder what it must be...?
     
  5. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    The Iraninans have a bit of a reputation for creating mockups and claiming they are new functional systems.
     
  6. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    860
    The wing tips are bent downwards. Trying to think of any current fighters that have those tips...See them on airliners/commercial.. Would those tips not create a large reflection?
     
  7. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,277
    Likes Received:
    3,482
    Interestingly Pops...remember the Volksyaeger/Salamanda/162?
    The tips usually bring stability in the turn...try to think of the "winged keel" of a performance yacht...A sign of a compromised design for an aircraft. Its also associated with "high tech" in people's minds...so its more likely and affectation.
     
  8. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    860
    They should have photo shopped out...Or maybe they put them in. ..Has to be fake. What size engine would be realistic for load/speed capability- also : radar size compared to pilot?
     
  9. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,277
    Likes Received:
    3,482
    Yeah...there could be a bunch of Photo shopping...i wonder why they didnt shoot it with the Iranian colours on it...? The size of engine depends on what its designed for...Like the F-117 (which was a bomber not fighter) it could be to infiltrate - slow and low - toss a bomb at a specific "must hit" target. Many models have the stabilizers on their wings...could this be a model blown up in size a little? Hollywood are vets at it...
     
  10. Poppy

    Poppy grasshopper

    Joined:
    Apr 9, 2008
    Messages:
    7,881
    Likes Received:
    860
    Shows how old I is...Phantom was last fighter can recall with bent tips...Have you got links? Need to update grey matter. Cheers.
     
  11. CAC

    CAC Ace of Spades

    Joined:
    Dec 1, 2010
    Messages:
    10,277
    Likes Received:
    3,482
    The F-4 has more a "saw-tooth" 2 stage wing...rather than stabilizers...for high speed stability...so it does a similar job.
     
  12. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,206
    Likes Received:
    3,284
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Here's some more-
    "Iran is hailing it as one of the most advanced fighter jets in the world, capable of evading radar, landing on short airstrips and controlling the skies with its deadly arsenal.

    The jet, known as the 'Qaher 313', was unveiled on Saturday at a ceremony involving Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other high-ranking officials.

    But aviation experts have expressed doubts about the aircraft based on an analysis of photos released by the Iranian government - not least of which is can it actually fly?
    David Cenciotti of the blog The Aviationist, pointed out what appear to be some serious design flaws.
    He wrote that the wiring of the cockpit's front panel appears too simple and it seems too small for a pilot to fit inside.
    'It looks like this pilot is in a miniature plane.
    'The shape is interesting with some innovative features but the Q-313 displayed on February 1, 2013, seems to be nothing more than a large mock up model (not properly sized to accommodate a real pilot…. ),' he wrote.
    'The cockpit seems to be basic (a bit too much for a modern plane – note the lack of wirings behind the front panel). And, above all, the aircraft is way too small.'
    Mr Cenciott's comments are backed up by the pictures at the unveiling ceremony where the plane appears to be made in miniature.
    He also notes the plane's air intakes are also quite small and the back engine contains no nozzle for afterburners, which would probably cause the minor setback of melting the entire jet."
    Dominant-313: Critics shoot down Iran's homemade stealth fighter that 'can't be detected by radar' | Mail Online

     
  13. GRW

    GRW Pillboxologist WW2|ORG Editor

    Joined:
    Oct 26, 2003
    Messages:
    21,206
    Likes Received:
    3,284
    Location:
    Stirling, Scotland
    Here's some more-
    "Iran is hailing it as one of the most advanced fighter jets in the world, capable of evading radar, landing on short airstrips and controlling the skies with its deadly arsenal.
    The jet, known as the 'Qaher 313', was unveiled on Saturday at a ceremony involving Iran's President Mahmoud Ahmadinejad and other high-ranking officials.
    But aviation experts have expressed doubts about the aircraft based on an analysis of photos released by the Iranian government - not least of which is can it actually fly?
    David Cenciotti of the blog The Aviationist, pointed out what appear to be some serious design flaws.
    He wrote that the wiring of the cockpit's front panel appears too simple and it seems too small for a pilot to fit inside.
    'It looks like this pilot is in a miniature plane.
    'The shape is interesting with some innovative features but the Q-313 displayed on February 1, 2013, seems to be nothing more than a large mock up model (not properly sized to accommodate a real pilot…. ),' he wrote.
    'The cockpit seems to be basic (a bit too much for a modern plane – note the lack of wirings behind the front panel). And, above all, the aircraft is way too small.'
    Mr Cenciott's comments are backed up by the pictures at the unveiling ceremony where the plane appears to be made in miniature.
    He also notes the plane's air intakes are also quite small and the back engine contains no nozzle for afterburners, which would probably cause the minor setback of melting the entire jet."
    Dominant-313: Critics shoot down Iran's homemade stealth fighter that 'can't be detected by radar' | Mail Online

     
  14. PzJgr

    PzJgr Drill Instructor

    Joined:
    Dec 19, 2000
    Messages:
    8,386
    Likes Received:
    890
    Location:
    Jefferson, OH
    I find it interesting that they are using English on some of their warning labels.
     
  15. lwd

    lwd Ace

    Joined:
    Jul 24, 2007
    Messages:
    12,322
    Likes Received:
    1,245
    Location:
    Michigan
    Here's a strategy page review of it:
    Murphy's Law: The Iranian Stealth Fighter Scam
     
  16. George Patton

    George Patton Canadian Refugee

    Joined:
    Aug 22, 2010
    Messages:
    3,229
    Likes Received:
    1,183
    Location:
    Ontario, Canada
    Yep. Essentially what I said a week ago. Someone just doesn't look right about it. If you look closely at the cockpit photo, I think you can see the fibreglass that its made out of (look to the side of the seat and you'll notice the odd texture). Also, its a bit difficult to fly a plane that doesn't have any type of lock to keep the canopy shut!

    Also in the news: An "in-flight" picture was published today. Too bad it was a horrendously poor photoshop job. Iran's 'fake' fighter jet spotted in the air (with a little help from Photoshop) | Mail Online
     

Share This Page