The ugliest tank in WW II

now that we already talked about the best looking/beautifull tank, this time lets talk about the ugliest.

 

IMHO, the M3 Grant and the M4 Sherman were both really ugly tanks. I really don't have a reason why though.

 

I hate the look of the Churchill and Cromwell, personally, as well as the Grant. These things are all squares and unharmonious shapes, unlike the German and Russian tanks or, say, the Comet. Another really ugly thing about the Cromwell is IMHO the giant bolts that keep the applique armour attached to the turret. Yuech!

 

Yeah, the Churchill is quite ugly too. I never liked that small turret/big body combo.

 

Tiger, hands down.

 

The Tiger is a work of art!

 

The Tiger is a shoe box someone kicked 300 times into the general shape of a tank.

 

for my opinion : the grant or lee ,what ever you want to call it , followed by the sherman, and then the churchill

 

I think they are ALL beautifull!!

 

Well spoken !

I actually think they all look fascinating in their own way, from the smallest Japanese tankette to the German heavies.

 

Of course, and they are all just tanks designed for fighting and not for aesthetics. But still I think some are uglier than others. The Tiger I, for example, is horribly wide and square (except the turret). But a shoe box...

 

..kicked 300 times.

 

I dare you to try it! Kick a shoe box, 8 meters long and 3 meters high, until it looks like a Tiger, and I will agree with you. But you can only kick three hundred times!

 

I'm tempted to actualy try the next time I go out and buy new shoes.

 

come on guys, sanity must provail, every body have different poins of view, so respect each other please!!!!
still I do not agree with the shoe box.....

 

my opinion would be the 1st panzer

 

Isn't she just cute?

 

awwwwwwww *melts to the floor*

on topic, the KV-2 was pretty damn ugly, but not even close to the M3 Grant/Lee

 

ph33r

 

Is that a infantry assualt tankette with mortars?