Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Which was the most famous tanks of WWII?

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by warpi, Jun 8, 2004.

  1. Revere

    Revere New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 25, 2005
    Messages:
    1,094
    Likes Received:
    2
    Location:
    Iowa, US
    via TanksinWW2
    Most famus the reds was the T-34/76 or T34/85 Brits was the churchill the americans well thats obiuos the m4a2 Sherman Germans Tiger Japs type 97 chi ha Italiens was the carro Armato M11/39
    Fastest-Sherman
    worst armour chiha or m11/39
    best armour Tiger or t34-85
    most reliable Sherman
    worst gun chiha or m11/39
     
  2. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    This specific type was apparently mostly shipped to the Soviet Union under Lend-Lease, the most common Western types being the M4, M4A1 and M4A3.
    The Panther was faster than the Sherman. So was the Panzer IV. Top speed, on road, that is; I doubt it's the same on cruise speed or off-road but I think the fastest medium tank of the war would have to be the Comet.
     
  3. Ricky

    Ricky Well-Known Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2004
    Messages:
    11,974
    Likes Received:
    105
    Location:
    Luton, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Are you sure?
    I think some of the earlier British cruisers were faster...
    I'll check!
     
  4. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Have you all forgotten the BT-series ? :)

    Road speed and cross country speed are two entirely different things btw. The M18 was a lot faster than a Sherman on the road ( faster than pretty much all other tanks actually ), but the Shermans used as replacements for M18s by the Tank Destroyer Battalions had no trouble keeping up with them off road.
     
  5. armyguy

    armyguy New Member

    Joined:
    May 10, 2005
    Messages:
    8
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    the bt series were fast but outgunned
     
  6. darkdemon333

    darkdemon333 New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    well, the US should have the M3A3 Lee, the Sherman, the Sherman 105 (remade version of the original sherman) and the Grant

    the Germans should have the Tiger tank, the panther, the King Tiger, the panzerwagen 1, thats about it

    the British should have the Cromwell, the Churchill, the mathilda and the Valentine and the Firefly

    the Japanese didnt really have any main battle tanks, but they did have Chi Ha which could be included

    the Soviets had T34s and T35s, those 2 were the most famous...
     
  7. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    The Grant was a British redesign of the Lee. I don't think the Americans ever used them.

    Might I ask why they should have both the Tiger and the King Tiger, but not the most common tank in their armoured forces, the PzKpfw IV?

    The T35 wasn't that famous, or that numerous, or that succesful, that I know of. If there are to be just two Soviet tanks, they should be the T34 and the KV1, in whatever version you prefer.
     
  8. darkdemon333

    darkdemon333 New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    12
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    most famous must be the tiger tank, the t34 tank and the sherman tank...
     
  9. M3A1 Stuart

    M3A1 Stuart New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vermont, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    Perhaps you would consider the following instead.

    M5 Stuart
    M4A3 Sherman
    M3 Grant
    M24 Chaffee
    M26 Pershing (Both the Pershing and Chaffee made it into combat toward the end of hostilities)
    M10 Wolverine (Tank Destroyer)
    M18 Hellcat (Tank Destroyer)
    M8 Greyhound (37mm equipped armored car)
    M3 Halftrack (T.D. 75mm equipped. Not well suited to the task)
    LVT(A)4 105 (Landing Vehicle Tracked equipped with 105 howitzer)

    As for anti-aircraft vehicles serving with US forces during the war years, two come to mind. The first is the M16 halftrack which has already been mentioned and is usually thought of because of it's four .50 cal. Browning machine guns. The other is the M15 halftrack. This had two .50 cal machine guns mounted on either side of a 37 mm cannon and was mounted in a rotating gun tub on the back of the vehicle.
     
  10. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    The Grant I (M3 medium with turret to British specifications (not design), no cupola, longer overhang, and pistol ports) was only used by the British.
    Grant II was the M3A5 medium, was used by British and US.
    Lee I was M3 medium (US turret)
    Lee II was M3A1 medium
    Lee III was M3A2 (none deliverd to the British)
    Lee IV was M3A3 with Continental engine;
    Lee V was diesel engiend M3A3
    Lee VI was the M3A4

    M3A1 Stuart:
    I don't think there was a LVT(A)4 with 105mm howitzer, other than perhaps as an experiment.
    LVT(A)1 had a 37mm gun (in an M3 turret)
    LVT(A)4 and LVT(A)5 had a 75mm howitzer (in the open M8 GMC turret)

    You might also want to consider the M36 90mm TD for your list as well.
     
  11. M3A1 Stuart

    M3A1 Stuart New Member

    Joined:
    May 14, 2005
    Messages:
    32
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Vermont, USA
    via TanksinWW2
    You are absolutely right. I was thinking one thing and typing another. Of course the LVT(A)4 had a 75mm gun. I completely forgot about the M36 as well.
     
  12. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    Let's see, that makes one right for me and, and, and ohmygawd that's awful lot wrong for me!
     
  13. E. Rommel phpbb3

    E. Rommel phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Charles City
    via TanksinWW2
    Jagdtiger was a TD
    I think all the Japs tanks should be called "light"
     
  14. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Erm, if you're going to have Japanese AFVs in there could I make a request to put France back in please.
    The Japanese tanks were relatively unknown to the general public (I still meet people that think they didn't have ANY).
    Char B1bis - 47 mm and a 75 in the hull. The 47 was good for the period and the 75 was capable of HE fire against infantry (not to mention a good hit with a 75mm round against Pzkpfw I/ II and similar wouldn't do much for the crews.)
    Other suggestions:
    Somua 35
    AMD 178 (armoured car)
    Renault G1R (just kidding - they didn't put it into service, but should have)
    H-39.
    I'd play French. Their biggest problem was not being used properly (and the fact that they were one-man turrets). But can you imagine a counter-attack in 1940 with a French "Panzer division" composed of B1s and S-25s? They had superb armour for that time.
    With a bit of thought the French could have done really well.
    Oli
     
  15. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    Just noticed on the post prior to mine.
    Valentine -attacks: inf.
    Surely that should be attacks: tank. No HE on 2pr guns.
    (FWIW, infantry tanks were a Brit designation for tanks to SUPPORT infantry, not ATTACK - grandma, here's the egg, here's what you do with it...)
    Oli
     
  16. E. Rommel phpbb3

    E. Rommel phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    May 5, 2005
    Messages:
    102
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Charles City
    via TanksinWW2
    Oli,
    The Japs actually had a chance to use their tanks while France didn't
    Keep France off you should
     
  17. Oli

    Oli New Member

    Joined:
    May 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,569
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Scunthorpe, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    What?! The French didn't use their tanks?? :lol: :lol: :lol:
    We must have different history books.
    Oli
     

Share This Page