Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Assault Guns : pros and cons

Discussion in 'The Tanks of World War 2' started by Ebar, Feb 8, 2005.

  1. Ebar

    Ebar New Member

    Joined:
    Apr 27, 2004
    Messages:
    2,006
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    On a space station in geosynchronous orbit above y
    via TanksinWW2
    Split from 'SPGs / assault gun / tank destroyers'

    The only assault guns I can think of were German or Russian did the western allies have anythings that would fit into this catagory?
     
  2. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    That depends on how you describe an assault gun. Does an SP infantry support gun count as an assault gun, like the Sturmgeschütz? If so, the M8 75mm howitzer (on Stuart carriage) counts as an assault gun.
     
  3. PanzerMeister

    PanzerMeister New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    For me, the original and real assault guns are StuGs and (I)SUs.
     
  4. shearwater

    shearwater New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 3, 2005
    Messages:
    120
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Right, so that's anything without a turret apart from TDs/panzerjaegers and ideally used for direct fire, infantry support? :-?
     
  5. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    No, not anything. SPGs like the M12 were often used in the direct fire support role as well, and the M18 was probably used more to provide fire support than as a tank destroyer.

    But the M8 was definitely an assault gun, although it doesn´t look much impressive next to an ISU-152.
     
  6. Christian Ankerstjerne

    Christian Ankerstjerne Member

    Joined:
    Jan 20, 2004
    Messages:
    2,801
    Likes Received:
    10
    Location:
    Denmark
    via TanksinWW2
    The British and Americans did have some experimental AFV's resembling the Sturmgeschütz, and especially the SU-100, but since they used tanks for infantry support already, it seems to me there would be little use for these...
     
  7. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    I think the SU100, with that huge unwieldly gun barrel, is probably the least useful as an assault gun of all the Russian turretless designs. It is definitely built to fight tanks at long ranges, not to support infantry attacks.

    Or am I getting this all wrong?
     
  8. PanzerMeister

    PanzerMeister New Member

    Joined:
    Dec 9, 2004
    Messages:
    565
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    I daresay that SU100 was the best assault gun of Russians and 100mm gun best of their arsenal.
     
  9. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    The best anti-tank gun, no doubt, but was it useful as an assault gun?
     
  10. Skua

    Skua New Member

    Joined:
    Aug 12, 2003
    Messages:
    2,889
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    I believe the Soviets called both the SU-85 and SU-100 assault guns, but both were in fact designed to counter the heavy German tanks. The SU-85 was equipped with the 85mm D5S tank gun later fitted to the T-34/85 and the SU-100 mounted the high velocity D10S gun. I´d say they both belong to the Tank Destroyer category.
     
  11. Markus Becker

    Markus Becker Member

    Joined:
    Jan 26, 2005
    Messages:
    503
    Likes Received:
    30
    via TanksinWW2
    Sometimes the difference between a TD and an AG is just the way you use it.

    battlefield.ru about the SU-152:


    Achtung Panzer about the Stug III:

     

Share This Page