Welcome to the WWII Forums! Log in or Sign up to interact with the community.

Where is this pic from?

Discussion in 'World War 2' started by finnishsoilder, Jun 24, 2006.

  1. finnishsoilder

    finnishsoilder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    Where is this taken at?
    Are they Russians or Germans?
     
  2. FNG phpbb3

    FNG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    is that a ww2 photo?

    anyway, the mg looks like a vickers which rules out the germans.

    The russians used vickers i believe

    FNG
     
  3. finnishsoilder

    finnishsoilder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    ya its a ww2 pic im most certain

    but it was in a german picture section
    but the vicker mg was used by the russians but it coould be captured
     
  4. FNG phpbb3

    FNG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    why would the germans use it?

    MG34/42's were common as muck in the german army,
    in my opinion better than the vickers,
    and they had plenty of ammo for it as it took their standard rifle round.

    FNG
     
  5. finnishsoilder

    finnishsoilder New Member

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2006
    Messages:
    9
    Likes Received:
    0
    via TanksinWW2
    ya true
    so they are most likely russian

    but still where are they at?
     
  6. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    They are German troops guarding a fjord in Norway. I have seen that picture before ;)
     
  7. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Why would they use a Vickers, and more importantly, why would they use a water-cooled MG in those conditions?
     
  8. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I think I seen this picture to im not sure were but possibly at WWIIincolour.

    The Germans are known for using captured equipment. For example some units used the wz.38 machine gun during the invasion of Poland. Why they would be using it in those conditions? I donnno i think the gun could still operate in the winter if not they no one woulda used it during WWII.
     
  9. majorwoody10

    majorwoody10 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ca.usa
    via TanksinWW2
    water cooled guns are way more accurate...those guys got to cover a great expanse of water and the gun is staying right there ....air cooled guns are better if you have to hump them around the country side alot cause they weigh a lot less.
     
  10. Roel

    Roel New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 29, 2003
    Messages:
    12,678
    Likes Received:
    3
    Location:
    Netherlands
    via TanksinWW2
    Is that true? As far as I know, all machine guns by the end of WW2 were air-cooled. For the Germans this switch was accelerated when they found that their water-cooled MGs froze up in the Russian winter of 1941.
     
  11. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    Antifreeze
     
  12. canambridge

    canambridge Member

    Joined:
    Mar 15, 2004
    Messages:
    1,649
    Likes Received:
    7
    via TanksinWW2
    Anti-freeze. Second class German divisions, such as static coast defense and fortress units, frequently used captured equipment, including MGs.
     
  13. majorwoody10

    majorwoody10 New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 20, 2005
    Messages:
    1,898
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    ca.usa
    via TanksinWW2
    water cooled mgs were still in use in the us army when my dad went through ocs...as an ordinance officer he was against the phaseing out of water cooled guns..(i think it was the heavy water jacket that made them so much more accurate...also the barrel stays lots cooler and dosnt distort....mg sections in the us army were horse mobile into the late 30s...makes sense when you consider the heavy load....
     
  14. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    I think the USMC still used the water cooled gun during the war. Not too sure though.
     
  15. FNG phpbb3

    FNG phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 22, 2005
    Messages:
    1,359
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Manchester, UK
    via TanksinWW2
    the M2 .50 cal had a water cooled varient.

    I suppose with a bit of though and jury rigging any fixed MG could be water cooled though the MG 42/34 weren't

    FNG
     
  16. dave phpbb3

    dave phpbb3 New Member

    Joined:
    Feb 11, 2004
    Messages:
    1,626
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Bristol, England
    via TanksinWW2
    the M1917A1 Browning .30 was still used during the war for fire support but I believe it was replaced by the air cooled M1919 variants and saw little use.
     
  17. Gunter_Viezenz

    Gunter_Viezenz New Member

    Joined:
    Sep 26, 2005
    Messages:
    1,838
    Likes Received:
    1
    Location:
    Windsor, Ontario
    via TanksinWW2
    Yes it could have been captured or it could be the MG 08, which was almsot a direct copy of Maxim's watercooled mg.
     
  18. Man

    Man New Member

    Joined:
    Oct 30, 2004
    Messages:
    1,457
    Likes Received:
    0
    Location:
    Norway
    via TanksinWW2
    The picture is of Germans from Norway (Northern Norway, IIRC). I have seen it before in a book on the occupation. It could well have been a captured Norwegian MG.
     

Share This Page